RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the last 10 years, the rate of femur fractures treated within 48 h from trauma has been introduced as a performance index for hospital management in Italy. Literature showed a significant indirect correlation between early treatment and mortality/comorbidity. The aims of early treatment are pain management and reduction of time to ambulation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether early treatment has reduced time to ambulation in femur fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients admitted to two level I trauma centers with proximal femoral fracture between 1/1/2017 and 31/12/2017 were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were patient age younger than 65 years, death before surgery, and nonsurgical treatment. The following data were collected: age, gender, date and time of admission to emergency department, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), type and side of fracture, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, date and time of surgery, surgical time, length of hospitalization, death during hospitalization, time from surgery to physiotherapy start, and time from surgery to first walking day. RESULTS: The study sample resulted in 660 patients. Mean age was 82 years, 64 % were female, mean BMI was 24 kg/m2, mean ASA score was 2.7, and 42 % were medial fractures. Mean time from admission to surgery was 95 h; 49.8 % were treated within the first 48 h. Mean time from surgery to physiotherapy start was 2 days, 21 % were not able to walk during hospitalization, time from surgery to first walking day was 5 days, and mean hospitalization time was 15 days. Early surgery was significantly (p = 0.008) associated with the probability of ambulation recovery during hospitalization. No association (p = 0.513) was found between early surgery and time in bed without walking. CONCLUSIONS: Early surgery in femur fracture became a priority in the health system. However, according to our data, although 51 % of patients were treated within the first 48 h, time from surgery to physiotherapy start (2 days) was still too long. Furthermore, time from surgery to first walking day was 6 days, longer than in most published papers. These data suggest that the performance index (rate of femur fractures treated within 48 h) may be improved by changing it to rate of femur fractures surgically treated with return to walking in 96 h. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 (retrospective study).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ᅟ.

RESUMEN

The indications for Open Abdomen (OA) are generally all those situations in which is ongoing the development an intra-abdominal hypertension condition (IAH), in order to prevent the development of abdominal compartmental syndrome (ACS). In fact all those involved in care of a critically ill patient should in the first instance think how to prevent IAH and ACS. In case of ACS goal directed therapy to achieve early opening and early closure is the key: paradigm of closure shifts to combination of therapies including negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic closure, in order to reduce complications and avoid incisional hernia. There have been huge studies and progress in survival of critically ill trauma and septic surgical patients: this in part has been through the great work of pioneers, scientific societies and their guidelines; however future studies and continued innovation are needed to better understand optimal treatment strategies and to define more clearly the indications, because OA by itself is still a morbid procedure.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of an endoscopic docking site surgery during the use of a classic bone transport technique for dealing with bone loss. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Nine patients treated with endoscopic docking site surgery (group 1) were compared with 18 patients treated with standard open grafting of the docking site (group 2). All 27 bone transports with distraction osteogenesis were performed for the treatment of segmental tibial bone defects. INTERVENTION: In group 1, 6 tibial and 3 tibiotalar docking sites were endoscopically treated. Anteromedial (instrumentation) and anterolateral (visualization) portals were used without a tourniquet, using a 30-degree arthroscope and a motorized 5-mm shaver/abrader. Fibrous tissue was removed, bone ends abraded, and the bone canal cleaned with bone grafting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical and radiographic. RESULTS: Bone transport lengthening was 9.7 and 9.1 cm in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Consolidation at the docking site occurred in 8 patients (89%) in group 1. The docking site consolidation time and index lengthening were lower in group 1 (18 vs. 20 weeks for group 2 and 1.59 vs. 1.82 mo/cm in group 1 vs. group 2). Time in the external fixator was similar between the 2 groups (461 vs. 466 days in group 1 vs. group 2). Normal alignment was observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that minimally invasive endoscopic docking site treatment during bone transport is a safe and viable technique using a common arthroscopic instrumentation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An antimicrobial dressing containing ionic silver was found effective in reducing surgical-site infection in a preliminary study of colorectal cancer elective surgery. We decided to test this finding in a randomized, double-blind trial. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery at two university-affiliated hospitals were randomly assigned to have the surgical incision dressed with Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber dressing or a common dressing. To blind the patient and the nursing and medical staff to the nature of the dressing used, scrub nurses covered Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber with a common wound dressing in the experimental arm, whereas a double common dressing was applied to patients of control group. The primary end-point of the study was the occurrence of any surgical-site infection within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients (58 in the experimental arm and 54 in the control group) qualified for primary end-point analysis. The characteristics of the patient population and their surgical procedures were similar. The overall rate of surgical-site infection was lower in the experimental group (11.1% center 1, 17.5% center 2; overall 15.5%) than in controls (14.3% center 1, 24.2% center 2, overall 20.4%), but the observed difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.451), even with respect to surgical-site infection grade 1 (superficial) versus grades 2 and 3, or grade 1 and 2 versus grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial did not confirm a statistically significant superiority of Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber dressing in reducing surgical-site infection after elective colorectal cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00981110.

Asunto(s)