RESUMEN
Right-sided hemothorax is a rare presentation of ruptured penetrating aortic ulcers. A 72-year-old female presented to the hospital with a penetrating aortic ulcer of the mid-thoracic aorta and a right-sided hemothorax. The patient was taken for thoracic endovascular aortic repair and right-sided tube thoracostomy. The diagnosis was complicated by the patient's history of pacemaker placement causing prominent venous collaterals in the mediastinum. The postoperative course was complicated by lower extremity weakness, requiring lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drain placement. The patient regained full function of her lower extremities. This case illustrates that patients with ruptured acute aortic syndromes may present with right hemothorax, so index of suspicion should remain high in this population.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Diaphragmatic rupture (DR) is an uncommon, potentially serious complication following blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma. Even with a high index of suspicion, the diagnosis of DR can easily be missed for a long period post injury. Delayed or missed diagnosis [delayed diagnosis of diaphragmatic rupture (DDDR)] and delayed diaphragmatic rupture (DDR) are possible explanations in cases where the initial operative exploration fails to show the diaphragmatic damage. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present a patient with suspected DR that was not seen on initial open abdominal exploration, but was suggested by subsequent serial imaging. This injury was ultimately identified on laparoscopic exploration. The procedure was converted to open (celiotomy) due to poor tolerance of the pneumoperitoneum required for laparoscopy, and the laceration was primarily repaired. We propose that DDR and DDDR be considered as a differential diagnosis in patients with a previous thoraco-abdominal trauma when presenting with radiologic/clinical signs suspicious for DR, even when the immediate post traumatic exploration failed to demonstrate a DR. CONCLUSIONS: A high index of suspicion is essential for early detection of DDR and DDDR. Patients with high impact injuries or surrounding organ damage should be followed with serial clinical examinations, follow-up radiologic assessments, and even re-exploration in situations highly suspicious for diaphragmatic injuries.
RESUMEN
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease is becoming a major health problem in Western societies as the population continues to age. In addition to risk of limb loss, the complexity of the disease is magnified by its intimate association with medical comorbidity, especially cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Risk factor modification and antiplatelet therapy are essential to improve long-term survival. Surgical intervention is indicated for intermittent claudication when a patient's quality of life remains unacceptable after a trial of conservative therapy. Open reconstruction and endovascular revascularization are cornerstone for limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia. Recent advances in catheter-based technology have made endovascular intervention the preferred treatment approach for infrainguinal disease in many cases. Nevertheless, lower extremity bypass remains an important treatment strategy, especially for reasonable risk patients with a suitable bypass conduit. In this review, we present a summary of current knowledge about peripheral arterial disease followed by a review of current, evidence-based medical and surgical therapy for infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.