Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 6(1): A02, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19080008

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In 2002, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute partnered with the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA's) Bureau of Primary Health Care and Office of Rural Health Policy to address cardiovascular health in the US-Mexico border region. From 2003 through 2005, the 2 agencies agreed to conduct an intervention program using Salud para su Corazón with promotores de salud (community health workers) in high-risk Hispanic communities served by community health centers (CHCs) in the border region to reduce risk factors and improve health behaviors. METHODS: Promotores de salud from each CHC delivered lessons from the curriculum Your Heart, Your Life. Four centers implemented a 1-group pretest-posttest study design. Educational sessions were delivered for 2 to 3 months. To test Salud para su Corazón-HRSA health objectives, the CHCs conducted the program and assessed behavioral and clinical outcomes at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the intervention. A 2-sample paired t test and analyses of variance were used to evaluate differences from baseline to postintervention. RESULTS: Changes in heart-healthy behaviors were observed, as they have been in previous Salud para su Corazón studies, lending credibility to the effectiveness of a promotores de salud program in a clinical setting. Positive changes were also observed in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, triglyceride level, waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure, weight, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that integrating promotores de salud into clinical practices is a promising strategy for culturally competent and effective service delivery. Promotores de salud build coalitions and partnerships in the community. The Salud para su Corazón-HRSA initiative was successful in helping to develop an infrastructure to support a promotores de salud workforce in the US-Mexico border region.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Presión Sanguínea , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Educación en Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Desarrollo de Programa , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Ethn Dis ; 16(2): 452-9, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17682248

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to evaluate the effect of family cohesiveness, acculturation, socioeconomic position, and cardiovascular risk factors on severity of diabetes among Mexican Americans. DESIGN AND STUDY POPULATION: The cross-sectional study involved a consecutive sample of 275 Mexican Americans under treatment for type 2 diabetes recruited from two medical clinics on the north side of Fort Worth, Texas. Recruitment and data collection took place during a span of 24 months from December 2001 to December 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hemoglobin A1C levels, available from medical charts, were used to indicate diabetes severity. Cases were defined as individuals with poorly controlled or severe diabetes based upon abnormally high hemoglobin A1C (> or = 7.0). Controls were defined as individuals with well-controlled or mild-moderate diabetes as reflected in a normal hemoglobin A1C (< 7.0). A face-to-face questionnaire was administered to study participants to collect data on protective factors related to family cohesiveness and acculturation, demographic and socioeconomic variables, and cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: The results suggest that several variables were associated with severity of diabetes, including, receipt of food stamps, having spent childhood in Mexico, and current smoking status. Other variables representing acculturation and family cohesiveness, separately or combined, approached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Even though acculturation and family cohesiveness as schemas were not statistically significant because of small sample size, they highlight the importance of building more sophisticated models for testing their association with severity of diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Aculturación , Diabetes Mellitus/fisiopatología , Relaciones Familiares/etnología , Americanos Mexicanos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , México/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Texas
4.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 2(3): A09, 2005 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15963311

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In 2001, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute partnered with the National Council of La Raza to conduct a pilot test of its community-based outreach program Salud Para Su Corazón (Health for Your Heart), which aims to reduce the burden of morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular disease among Latinos. METHODS: The effectiveness of promotores de salud (community health workers) in improving heart-healthy behaviors among Latino families participating in the pilot program at seven sites was evaluated. Data on the characteristics of the promotores in the Salud Para Su Corazón program were compiled. Promotores collected data on family risk factors, health habits, referrals and screenings, information sharing, and program satisfaction from 223 participating Latino families (320 individual family members) through questionnaires. Paired t tests and chi-square tests were used to measure pretest-posttest differences among program participants. RESULTS: Results demonstrated the effectiveness of the promotora model in improving heart-healthy behaviors, promoting community referrals and screenings, enhancing information sharing beyond families, and satisfying participants' expectations of the program. The main outcome of interest was the change in heart-healthy behaviors among families. CONCLUSION: The community outreach model worked well in the seven pilot programs because of the successes of the promotores and the support of the community-based organizations. Successes stemmed in part from the train-the-trainer approach. Promotoria, as implemented in this program, has the potential to be integrated with a medical model of patient care for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etnología , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Promoción de la Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Educación en Salud/métodos , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Actividad Motora , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA