Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 38(4): 343-7, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26208401

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether sparing neck-level IB in target delineation of node-positive (N+) oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) can improve xerostomia outcomes without compromising locoregional control (LRC). METHODS: A total of 125 N+ OPC patients with a median age of 57 years underwent chemoradiation between May 2010 and December 2011. A total of 74% of patients had T1-T2 disease, 26% T3-T4, 16% N1, 8% N2A, 48% N2B, 28% N2C; 53% base of tongue, 41% tonsil, and 6% other. Patients were divided into those who had target delineation sparing of bilateral level IB (the spared cohort) versus no sparing (the treated cohort). Sparing of contralateral high-level II nodes was also performed more consistently in the spared cohort. A prospective xerostomia questionnaire (patient reported) was given at each patient follow-up visit to this cohort of patients to assess late xerostomia. Clinical assessment (observer rated) at each patient follow-up visit was also recorded. RESULTS: The 2-year LRC for the spared and treated cohorts was 97.5% and 93.8%, respectively (median follow-up, 23.2 mo). No locoregional failures occurred outside of treatment fields. The spared cohort experienced significant benefits in patient-reported xerostomia summary scores (P=0.021) and observer-rated xerostomia scores (P=0.006). In addition, there were significant reductions in mean doses to the ipsilateral submandibular gland (63.9 vs. 70.5 Gy; P<0.001), contralateral submandibular gland (45.0 vs. 56.2 Gy; P<0.001), oral cavity (35.9 vs. 45.2 Gy; P<0.001), and contralateral parotid gland (20.0 vs. 24.4 Gy; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Target delineation sparing of bilateral level IB nodes in N+ OPC reduced mean doses to salivary organs without compromising LRC. Patients with reduced target volumes had better patient-reported xerostomia outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Órganos en Riesgo , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Glándulas Salivales , Xerostomía/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Glándula Parótida , Dosis de Radiación , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Glándula Submandibular , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA