Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anesteziol Reanimatol ; (4): 34-8, 2008.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18819393

RESUMEN

Feasibility of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) as an efficient and safe adjunct to the standardized treatment protocol and its possible immunomodulatory impact were assessed in the prospective and controlled study of 44 patients with diagnosed acute pancreatitis (AP). The course of the disease was accompanied by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (AIRS) in all the patients on admission. The impact of AP and HBO on homeostasis, the number of performed operations, mortality rates, the levels of two cytokines, intraabdominal pressure, and side effects caused by HBO were evaluated. A treatment group consisted of 22 patients receiving HBO therapy for 3 days (twice a day) using a monoplace chamber under pressures of 1.7-1.9 ATA. Patients (n = 22) in the control group were managed in accordance with the standardized treatment protocol. The authors found more stable homeostasis, decreased mortality rate, and the number of operations in the HBO group. This type of additional therapy, possibly contributed to the decrease of intraabdominal pressure within the first six days after admission. The findings suggest HBO can affect an inflammatory response, by decreasing the levels pro-inflammatory cytokines and increasing those of anti-inflammatory ones.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Pancreatitis , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Interleucina-6/sangre , Cinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/inmunología , Pancreatitis/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores Tipo II del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/sangre , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/etiología , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/inmunología , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Colorectal Dis ; 9(5): 423-9, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17504339

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the early postoperative results and late patient-related postoperative results by a Short-Form 36 quality of life survey after conventional haemorrhoidectomy and PPH procedure with additional surgical intervention in noncomplicated, complicated and delayed cases of the disease. METHOD: The comparison was made between comparable patient groups after conventional haemorrhoidectomy (n = 168) and after PPH with additional surgical intervention (n = 142). The early and late postoperative results and quality of life analysis according to SF-36 questionnaire were compared. RESULTS: The length of procedure was significantly shorter after the PPH procedure (37.4 vs 49.4 min). The amount of postoperative nonopiate analgesics was similar, but consumption of opiates was more in the conventional group. The rate of early postoperative complications was similar. In the PPH group significant improvement in all quality of life parameters was ascertained 6 months after operation, but 6 weeks after surgery several parameters in this group were lower. In the conventional group improvement was ascertained only for several parameters. The significant improvement of quality of life after PPH operations was ascertained especially at a mean period of 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: The PPH procedure performed in complex cases of the disease and combined with other surgical intervention because of the anorectal comorbidity assures better early postoperative results and better postoperative quality of life in a 6-month follow up in comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. The continuation of quality of life studies with a longer follow up is required concerning Longo operation.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Hemorroides/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio , Recto/cirugía , Suturas
3.
Zentralbl Chir ; 128(10): 858-61, 2003 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14628236

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Minimally invasive surgery is a new and promising treatment modality in the management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Aim of our study was the evaluation of our first experiences with laparoscopic surgery in the management of patients with SAP. METHODS: A total of 65 patients complied with Atlanta recommendations for SAP and were included into this retrospective study. Indications for laparoscopic surgery were SAP presented with intraabdominal or retroperitoneal exudates and detected by ultrasound (US) and/or contrast enhanced computer tomography (CT) scan, and the presence of acute calculous cholecystitis when 3 to 5 days of conservative treatment did not show clinical improvement and surgical treatment was considered. Patients with improvement after initial therapy received conservative therapy only. Bacteriological cultures were done for abdominal exudates and necrotic tissue obtained during surgery. RESULTS: Totally, 39 patients were operated and 26 were treated conservatively only. Laparoscopic surgery was started in 31 patients and completed in 26 patients. The overall conversion rate was 16.1 %. Laparoscopic drainage of the intraabdominal exudate was done in 26 patients including drainage of the lesser sac in five of them. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 25 cases and laparoscopically assisted jejunostomy in 6 cases were performed as a part of the procedure. Conventional surgery was the primary procedure in 8 patients. Peripancreatic abscess formation was observed in one case one month after laparoscopic procedure and was cured with conventional surgical drainage. Bile leakage from the cystic stump was successfully treated with endoscopic papillotomy in one case. All patients survived after laparoscopic procedures. Overall complication rate was 7.7 % and mortality reached 3.1 %. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic drainage of the abdominal cavity, drainage of the lesser sac and revision of the retroperitoneal compartment can be safely carried out as an alternative to the conventional surgical approach. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and/or jejunostomy may be additionally performed if indicated.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Drenaje , Femenino , Humanos , Yeyunostomía , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seguridad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA