Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Urol ; 36(5): 699-704, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29275507

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: PSA screening has been rehabilitated. PSA is not specific and can be elevated by benign reasons. Additionally, a subgroup of patients with prostate hyperplasia may harbor prostate cancer (PCa). During monitoring, the clinician aims to detect significant tumors in time, submitting patients to minimal psychological and physical burden, especially in men with high serum PSA and repeat biopsies. We aimed to determine long-term outcomes with respect to ANNA/C-TRUS ability to detect PCa with six targeted biopsies. METHODS: A subset of 71 patients were enrolled. During monitoring, they were subjected to primary, secondary, or even multiple prostate biopsies when needed. Protocol monitoring included PSA measurements, digital rectal examination (DRE) and imaging. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12 years. Forty-one patients had a history of negative systematic random biopsies (1-3 sessions). Their age ranges 62-85 years, PSA 0.5-47.3 ng/ml, and the median prostate volume 11-255 cc. During monitoring, 15 patients were diagnosed with PCa. Only two harbored aggressive tumors. The median time to diagnosis was 6 years. All PCa patients are free from biochemical relapse. From the remaining 56 patients, 11 did not have any biopsies, 12 had one, 13 had two, and 20 had three or more biopsy sessions. CONCLUSIONS: ANNA/C-TRUS is a useful method monitoring patients with a risk of PCa. 50-75% of the usually performed biopsy cores could be spared and, after 12 years, 97% of the patients were either without evidence of a PCa or were diagnosed with a good prognosis tumor.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tacto Rectal/métodos , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Masculino , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Pronóstico , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análisis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo/métodos
2.
World J Urol ; 29(5): 573-9, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21691722

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To improve prostate cancer diagnostic imaging, a computer-based analysis of the transrectal ultrasound signal (C-TRUS) was developed. Until recently, the C-TRUS existed only as a stand-alone device. Now, C-TRUS was developed into a network-compatible module (C-TRUS-MS). This new technology allows users to transmit C-TRUS images from any internet platform to C-TRUS-MS investigation. After analysis, the cancer-suspicious marked images are then retransmitted via internet. Targeted biopsies can then be taken at the urologists' office remotely. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study investigates whether the rates of prostate cancer detection with C-TRUS-MS "multicenter online" are comparable with those achieved by the stand-alone unit. In addition to patients with a history of multiple systematic random biopsies, a group of patients who had not undergone systematic random biopsies were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1,545 digital images (2-23 per patient, median 6) from 57 urologists were transmitted to the analysis center. After analysis, the color-coded images were sent back electronically and utilized for a maximum of six targeted biopsies. C-TRUS-MS was able to detect prostate cancer in 91 patients. In addition, we evaluated 75 patients without any previous random biopsies. In this group, C-TRUS-MS was able to detect prostate cancer in 31 out of 75 patients (41%). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that C-TRUS-MS "online" achieves similar results as the stand-alone system, independent of the user even with little experience in the method. Furthermore, C-TRUS-MS for the first time is able to detect carcinomas in patients without prior biopsies in a high number by taking only six targeted biopsies.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Computador , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía
3.
World J Urol ; 25(4): 361-6, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17701043

RESUMEN

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) of the prostate is a specific urological examination. This morphological imaging technique is often capable of identifying the cause for raised values of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or of clarifying hard tissue regions found during rectal palpation. Particulary in view of constantly increasing number of patients undergoing PSA tests, there is a rising need for further prostate diagnostics in otherwise asymptomatic men. Especially in the gray zone between 4 and 10 ng/ml the tissue marker PSA is frequently influenced by benign alterations, so that it is not possible--on the basis of the PSA value alone--to differentiate between benign and malignant causes. Only a clearly increased serum PSA value (>20 ng/ml) indicates the presence of a prostate carcinoma at a very high probability. However, it is necessary that all patients whose PSA is elevated, undergo a bioptical tissue sample procedure in order to try to diagnose prostate cancer. Today, we regard the technique of TRUS-based transrectal prostate biopsy, carried out with a semi-automatic coil spring device and an 18-gauge needle, as the gold standard. The core problem of visual TRUS assessment lies in its lack of specificity, especially if the examiner has only limited experience. There can be low-echo, cancer-suspicious areas that may be histologically either benign or malignant. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), vessels, centers of prostatitis as well as shadows and artefacts can often also be low in echo-density. Only adequate application of this technology and experience with this method can lead to satisfying biopsy and diagnostic results.


Asunto(s)
Endosonografía/métodos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endosonografía/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Masculino , Recto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA