Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Thromb Haemost ; 8(4): 722-9, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20088937

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Idraparinux is an inhibitor of activated factor X (FXa) with a long half-life allowing once-weekly dosing. Idrabiotaparinux is a biotinylated version of idraparinux; its activity can be reversed with avidin. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the tolerability, safety and pharmacodynamics of avidin in healthy subjects and patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) receiving idrabiotaparinux. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind Phase I study, 41 healthy males received subcutaneous idrabiotaparinux before being randomized to a 30-min intravenous avidin infusion or placebo. Idrabiotaparinux plus avidin were re-administered 10-14 months later in eight subjects. In addition, in a prospective substudy of the Phase III EQUINOX trial, 55 patients who received weekly idrabiotaparinux for 6 months were randomized to receive either 100 mg avidin (n = 33) or placebo (n = 22). The primary activity outcome was anti-FXa activity calculated immediately before and after avidin infusion. Adverse events were recorded to assess safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Avidin rapidly reversed the anti-FXa activity of idrabiotaparinux, ranging from 66.1 to 90.3% in healthy subjects and from 67 to 97% (mean 78%) in DVT patients. Avidin was well tolerated, with a similar nature and frequency of adverse events to placebo. No venous thromboembolism recurrence occurred in the 3-month post-avidin infusion. CONCLUSION: A 30-min intravenous infusion of avidin 100 mg is well tolerated, safe, and offers immediate and specific reversibility both after single and repeated doses of idrabiotaparinux in healthy subjects, and in DVT patients following a 6-month treatment period.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Avidina/administración & dosificación , Biotina/análogos & derivados , Coagulantes/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Oligosacáridos/administración & dosificación , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Avidina/efectos adversos , Biotina/administración & dosificación , Coagulantes/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Prevención Secundaria , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/sangre , Adulto Joven
2.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 57(12): 1137-41, 2000 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10911512

RESUMEN

The potential interaction between zaleplon and ibuprofen was studied. Healthy adult volunteers were given a dose of zaleplon 10 mg alone, a dose of ibuprofen 600 mg alone, or a dose of zaleplon 10 mg and a dose of ibuprofen 600 mg concomitantly in an open-label, randomized, three-period crossover study. There was a seven-day washout period between treatments. Venous blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis at various intervals up to 14 hours after drug administration. A total of 17 subjects (11 men and 6 women) completed the study. There were no significant differences between zaleplon monotherapy and combination therapy in mean +/- SD, of zaleplon clearance (CL) (2.80 +/- 0.72 versus 2.72 +/- 0.89 L/hr/kg, respectively), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) (37.1 +/- 17.9 versus 39.8 +/- 20.0 ng/mL), or area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) (56.7 +/- 22.8 versus 59.2 +/- 22.0 ng.hr/mL). There were no significant differences between ibuprofen monotherapy and combination therapy in ibuprofen CL (71.6 +/- 17.0 versus 71.7 +/- 14.9 L/hr/kg), Cmax (40.8 +/- 10.2 versus 40.4 +/- 10.0 micrograms/mL), or AUC (127.6 +/- 29.6 versus 126.4 +/- 29.7 micrograms.hr/mL). Three subjects had one or more adverse effects with zaleplon alone, one subject had one or more with ibuprofen alone, and one subject had one or more with combination therapy. The adverse effects were mild and resolved without intervention. There was no evidence of a significant interaction between zaleplon and ibuprofen.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/farmacocinética , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacocinética , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Ibuprofeno/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Acetamidas/sangre , Administración Oral , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/sangre , Anticonvulsivantes/sangre , Área Bajo la Curva , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Estudios Cruzados , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Semivida , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/sangre , Masculino , Pirimidinas/sangre
3.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 57(24): 2267-70, 2000 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11146970

RESUMEN

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of digoxin alone and digoxin plus zaleplon were studied. Healthy, nonsmoking men between 18 and 45 years of age were given a single oral dose of digoxin 0.375 mg daily on days 1 through 9. On days 10 through 14, the subjects received digoxin 0.375 mg plus oral zaleplon 10 mg daily. Blood samples were obtained on days 3, 5, 8, 9, and 14, and serum digoxin concentration data were analyzed by model-independent pharmacokinetic methods. Blood pressure, heart rate, PR interval, and QTc interval were recorded to determine the effect of zaleplon on digoxin pharmacodynamics. A total of 20 men completed the study. Maximum serum digoxin concentration and area under the serum digoxin concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 24 hours met bioequivalence test criteria. There were no significant differences in QTc or PR interval between days 9 (digoxin alone) and 14 (digoxin plus zaleplon), and there were no clinically important changes from baseline to the study's end in vital signs, physical examination findings, or ECG results for individual subjects. Eighteen percent of the subjects who received digoxin alone and 35% of those who received digoxin plus zaleplon reported one or more adverse effects; all were mild and resolved quickly. Zaleplon had no significant effects on selected pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of digoxin.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/farmacocinética , Cardiotónicos/farmacocinética , Digoxina/farmacocinética , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Cardiotónicos/sangre , Intervalos de Confianza , Digoxina/sangre , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 48(3): 367-74, 1999 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10510148

RESUMEN

AIMS: To compare the duration of the residual hypnotic and sedative effects of zaleplon with those of zolpidem and placebo following nocturnal administration at various times before morning awakening. METHODS: Zaleplon 10 mg, zolpidem 10 mg, or placebo was administered double-blind to 36 healthy subjects under standardized conditions in a six-period, incomplete-block, crossover study. Subjects were gently awakened and given medication at predetermined times 5, 4, 3, or 2 h before morning awakening, which occurred 8 h after bedtime. When the subjects awoke in the morning, a battery of subjective and objective assessments of residual effects of hypnotics was administered. RESULTS: No residual effects were demonstrated after zaleplon 10 mg, when administered as little as 2 h before waking, on either subjective or objective assessments, whereas zolpidem 10 mg showed significant residual effects on DSST and memory (immediate and delayed free recall) after administration up to 5 h before waking and choice reaction time, critical flicker fusion threshold and Sternberg memory scanning after administration up to 4 h before waking. Residual effects of zolpidem were apparent in all objective and subjective measurements when the drug was administered later in the night. CONCLUSIONS: The present results demonstrate that zaleplon at the dose of 10 mg is free of residual hypnotic or sedative effects when administered nocturnally as little as 2 h before waking in normal subjects. In contrast, residual effects of zolpidem are still apparent on objective assessments up to 5 h after nocturnal administration, longer than has been reported from studies involving daytime administration.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Acetamidas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Memoria/efectos de los fármacos , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Zolpidem
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA