RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pharmacy students with substantial educational debt are at risk for excessive workloads, burnout, and clinical errors. During the COVID-19 pandemic, policies addressing economic hardships for all student debt borrowers included temporary suspension of monthly payments and 0% interest during the pause. This study aimed to understand student-level factors regarding student debt from the lived experiences of current pharmacy students and aimed to understand how current pharmacy students view temporary loan relief. METHODS: We used semi-structured interviews of pharmacy students across 4 years of progression in their pharmacy program to better understand student experiences with debt, different factors that may influence the impact of student debt on short-term and long-term outcomes for students, and student perspectives on debt relief policies and potential solutions. Our thematic analysis was grounded in existing evidence and a conceptual framework, while also allowing codes to emerge directly from the data. RESULTS: A total of 20 pharmacy students were interviewed with a median student debt of $77,000, with debt amounts ranging from $0 to $209,000. Students described what mediating factors influenced their experiences, the influence of student debt on clinician burnout, and other outcomes impacted by student debt. Six overarching themes emerged relevant to current students: student debt influences education and career decisions, debt is risky given the saturated pharmacy market, debt is an accepted burden, debt will inhibit starting a life, the COVID-19 loan relief is revealing, and early financial education is needed. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy students burdened with debt described a variety of different experiences and attitudes toward that debt and provided their perspectives on how student debt influences short-term education and career decisions. While students accept the trade-off of debt for their education as an inevitable burden, reported coping mechanisms and strategies shared suggest some solutions may be available to ameliorate this burden.
Asunto(s)
Educación en Farmacia , Estudiantes de Farmacia , Humanos , Pandemias , Apoyo a la Formación Profesional , Selección de Profesión , Agotamiento PsicológicoRESUMEN
The association between perinatal depression and infant cognitive development has been well documented in research based in high-income contexts, but the literature regarding the same relationship in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is less developed. The aim of this study is to systematically review what is known in this area in order to inform priorities for early intervention and future research in LMICs. The review protocol was pre-registered on Prospero (CRD42018108589) and relevant electronic databases were searched using a consistent set of keywords and 1473 articles were screened against the eligibility criteria. Sixteen articles were included in the review, seven focusing on the antenatal period, eight on the postnatal period, and one which included both. Five out of eight studies found a significant association between antenatal depression (d = .21-.93) and infant cognitive development, while four out of nine studies found a significant association with postnatal depression (d = .17-.47). Although the evidence suggests that LMICs should prioritise antenatal mental health care, many of the studies did not adequately isolate the effects of depression in each period. Furthermore, very few studies explored more complex interactions that may exist between perinatal depression and other relevant factors. More high-quality studies are needed in LMIC settings, driven by current theory, that test main effects and examine moderating or mediating pathways to cognitive development.
Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil , Cognición , Depresión Posparto , Adulto , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , EmbarazoRESUMEN
Studies in western cultures have proposed mechanisms by which adverse childhood experiences can affect mental health, including mediating variables such as social support and resilience. However, research replicating these findings in perinatal populations are sparse in Asia. This study assessed the association between lifetime trauma and postpartum depressive symptoms. Additionally, the study examined the mediating role that resilience and social support can play in this association. This study was conducted on 458 women participating in the PRAMMS cohort in urban Bangalore. Information on lifetime trauma was collected through a culturally appropriate trauma interview and postpartum depressive symptoms (8 weeks) were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Resilience was assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 and social support was assessed through the Zimet's Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. A linear model was used to measure the association between lifetime trauma and postpartum depression and mediation analysis was used to assess the role of resilience and social support in the primary association. All analyses were conducted using SPSS. In this cohort, 254 women reported at least one trauma and 204 reported no trauma. A higher number of lifetime traumatic events was associated with higher EPDS scores (ß = 0.487, 95%CI: 0.267-0.707). Social support was found to have a negative association between the predictor and the outcome; however, resilience was not a statistically significant mediator. Lifetime trauma was associated with postpartum depressive symptoms in our study and social support negatively mediated the association between lifetime trauma and postpartum depressive symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto , Depresión , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico , Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are few published studies evaluating the impact of perinatal residence change on infant outcomes and whether these associations differ by socioeconomic status. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using Washington State birth certificate data from 2007 to 2014 to assess whether women who moved during the first trimester of pregnancy (n=28 011) had a higher risk of low birth weight, preterm birth and small for gestational age than women who did not move during the first trimester (n=112 367). 'Non-first-trimester movers' were frequency matched 4:1 to movers by year. We used generalised linear models to calculate risk ratios and risk differences adjusted for maternal age, race, marital status, parity, education, smoking, income and insurance payer for the birth. We also stratified analyses by variables related to socioeconomic status to see whether associations differed across socioeconomic strata. RESULTS: Moving in the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of low birth weight (6.4% vs 4.5%, adjusted risk ratio 1.37 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.45)) and preterm birth (9.1% vs 6.4%, adjusted risk ratio 1.42 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.49)) and a slight increased risk of small for gestational age (9.8% vs 8.7%, adjusted risk ratio 1.09 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.09)). Residence change was associated with low birth weight and preterm birth in all socioeconomic strata. CONCLUSION: Moving during the first trimester of pregnancy may be a risk factor for adverse birth outcomes in US women. Healthcare providers may want to consider screening for plans to move and offering support.