Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 42(2): 326-36, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22288514

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ara h 2 and Ara h 6, co-purified together in a 13-25 kD fraction (Ara h 2/6; 20 kD fraction) on gel filtration chromatography, account for the majority of effector activity in a crude peanut extract (CPE) when assayed with RBL SX-38 cells sensitized with IgE from human peanut allergic sera. OBJECTIVES: To determine if Ara h 2/6 are the primary peanut allergens responsible for allergic reactions in vivo and to determine if Ara h 2/6 would be sufficient to prevent allergic reactions to a complete CPE. METHODS: An oral sensitization mouse model of peanut allergy was used to assess the activity of Ara h 2/6 (20 kD) and CPE without the 20 kD fraction (CPE w/o 20 kD) for allergic provocation challenge and immunotherapy. The activity of these preparations was also tested in an assay of histamine release from human basophils in whole blood. RESULTS: Compared with mice challenged with control CPE, mice challenged with CPE w/o 20 kD experienced reduced symptoms (P < 0.05) and a smaller decrease in body temperature (P < 0.01). Results with the basophil histamine release assay corroborated these findings (P < 0.01). The mouse model was also used to administer Ara h 2/6 (20 kD) in an immunotherapy protocol, in which peanut-allergic mice treated with the 20 kD fraction experienced significantly reduced symptoms, changes in body temperature, and mast cell protease (MMCP-1) release compared with placebo (P < 0.01 for all parameters). Importantly, immunotherapy with the 20 kD fraction was just as effective as treatment with CPE, whereas CPE w/o 20 kD was significantly less effective for higher dose peanut challenges. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ara h 2/6 are the most potent peanut allergens in vivo and can be used to desensitize peanut-allergic mice. These results have potential implications for clinical research in the areas of diagnosis and immunotherapy for peanut allergy.


Asunto(s)
Albuminas 2S de Plantas , Anafilaxia/terapia , Antígenos de Plantas , Arachis/efectos adversos , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Glicoproteínas , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/terapia , Albuminas 2S de Plantas/inmunología , Albuminas 2S de Plantas/farmacología , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Animales , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Antígenos de Plantas/farmacología , Arachis/inmunología , Basófilos/inmunología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Glicoproteínas/inmunología , Glicoproteínas/farmacología , Histamina/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/inmunología , Triptasas/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA