RESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: This study aimed to evaluate if there is a difference between outcomes when retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery is performed at the time of colpocleisis. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of the retropubic midurethral sling (RP-MUS) versus the transobturator midurethral sling (TO-MUS) in women who underwent concomitant colpocleisis, specifically 2-year MUS failure and 1-year lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs). A secondary aim was to identify factors associated with these surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: All cases of concomitant MUS and colpocleisis within a closed, integrated health care delivery system were reviewed between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2020. Postoperative MUS failure was defined as (1) postoperative stress urinary incontinence symptoms and/or (2) additional anti-incontinence surgery. Postoperative LUTSs were defined as (1) MUS lysis and/or (2) overactive bladder requiring management with a new treatment. RESULTS: Of the 558 women included, 454 (81%) received RP-MUS and 104 (19%) received TO-MUS. Cohort demographics were similar. Neither MUS failure (7% RP-MUS and 9% TO-MUS, P = 0.450) nor LUTSs (7% RP-MUS and 12% TO-MUS, P = 0.171) were significantly different between RP-MUS and TO-MUS. In multivariable analysis, age was found to be significantly associated with LUTSs (odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.93, P = 0.038 among 70-74-year-olds; odds ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.83, P = 0.022 among 75-79-year-olds). CONCLUSIONS: At the time of colpocleisis, both RP-MUS and TO-MUS were highly successful and associated with a low incidence of LUTSs, including MUS lysis. The findings of this large study support RP-MUS and TO-MUS as similarly effective anti-incontinence options at time of colpocleisis.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: : The objective of the study was to determine if vaginal pessaries improve symptoms of prolapse and body image in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Our hypothesis was that pessary use would improve prolapse-related symptoms and body image up to 1 year. METHODS: : Women presenting for pessary insertion completed questionnaires regarding pelvic floor-related symptoms and body image with successful pessary insertion and after 6 to 12 months of continued pessary use. Scores were compared with a paired t test. RESULTS: : Forty-three subjects had complete data for analysis. Scores on both prolapse-related and body image questionnaires showed improvements at 6 months (P < 0.001) and 12 months (P < 0.010). Younger women and those with prior prolapse surgery were less likely to continue to use a pessary past 3 to 6 months. Stage of prolapse, body mass index, and scores on symptom questionnaires did not correlate with likelihood of continued pessary use versus surgery. CONCLUSIONS: : The use of a pessary for more than 12 months improves symptoms of prolapse and self perception of body image.