RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bone destruction is the most frequent disease-defining clinical feature of multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in skeletal-related events such as back pain, pathological fractures, or neurologic compromise including epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC). Up to 24% of patients with MM will be affected by ESCC. Radiation therapy has been proven to be highly effective in pain relief in patients with MM. However, a critical knowledge gap remains with regard to neurologic outcomes in patients with high-grade ESCC treated with radiation. METHODS: We retrospectively included 162 patients with MM and high-grade ESCC (grade 2 or 3) who underwent radiation therapy of the spine between January 2010 and July 2021. The primary outcome was the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score after 12 to 24 months, or the last known ASIA score if the patient had had a repeat treatment or died. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with poor neurologic outcomes after radiation, defined as neurologic deterioration or lack of improvement. RESULTS: After radiation therapy, 34 patients (21%) had no improvement in their impaired neurologic function and 27 (17%) deteriorated neurologically. Thirty-six patients (22%) underwent either surgery or repeat irradiation after the initial radiation therapy. There were 100 patients who were neurologically intact at baseline (ASIA score of E), of whom 16 (16%) had neurologic deterioration. Four variables were independently associated with poor neurologic outcomes: baseline ASIA (odds ratio [OR] = 6.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.70 to 17.38; p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (OR = 6.19; 95% CI = 1.49 to 29.49; p = 0.015), number of levels affected by ESCC (OR = 4.02; 95% CI = 1.19 to 14.18; p = 0.026), and receiving steroids prior to radiation (OR = 4.42; 95% CI = 1.41 to 16.10; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that 38% of patients deteriorated or did not improve neurologically after radiation therapy for high-grade ESCC. The results highlight the need for multidisciplinary input and efforts in the treatment of high-grade ESCC in patients with MM. Future studies will help to improve patient selection for specific and standardized treatments and to clearly delineate which patients are likely to benefit from radiation therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Compresión de la Médula Espinal , Traumatismos Vertebrales , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/radioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This phase I trial evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of investigational oral TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 plus paclitaxel, with/without trastuzumab, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients received TAK-228 6-40 mg via three dosing schedules; once daily for 3 days (QDx3d QW) or 5 days per week (QDx5d QW), and once weekly (QW) plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (dose-escalation phase, n = 47) and with/without trastuzumab 2 mg/kg (expansion phase, n = 20). Doses were escalated using a modified 3 + 3 design, based upon dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1. RESULTS: TAK-228 pharmacokinetics exhibited dose-dependent increase in exposure when dosed with paclitaxel and no apparent differences when administered with or 24 h after paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, stomatitis, fatigue, rash, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and nausea. The maximum tolerated dose of TAK-228 was determined as 10-mg QDx3d QW; the expansion phase proceeded with 8-mg QDx3d QW. Overall, the most common grade ≥3 drug-related toxicities were neutropenia (21%), diarrhea (12%), and hyperglycemia (12%). Of 54 response-evaluable patients, eight achieved partial response and six had stable disease lasting ≥6 months. CONCLUSION: TAK-228 demonstrated a safety profile consistent with other TORC inhibitors and promising preliminary antitumor activity in a range of tumor types; no meaningful difference was noted in the pharmacokinetics of TAK-228 when administered with or 24 h after paclitaxel. These findings support further investigation of TAK-228 in combination with other agents including paclitaxel, with/without trastuzumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01351350.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Benzoxazoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Benzoxazoles/efectos adversos , Benzoxazoles/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Diana Mecanicista del Complejo 1 de la Rapamicina , Diana Mecanicista del Complejo 2 de la Rapamicina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complejos Multiproteicos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions of the potent, selective, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, saxagliptin, in combination with metformin, glyburide or pioglitazone. METHODS: To assess the effect of co-administration of saxagliptin with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of saxagliptin, 5-hydroxy saxagliptin, metformin, glyburide, pioglitazone and hydroxy-pioglitazone, analyses of variance were performed on maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration (C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) [saxagliptin + metformin (study 1) and saxagliptin + glyburide (study 2)] and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to time t (AUC) [saxagliptin + pioglitazone (study 3)] for each analyte in the respective studies. Studies 1 and 2 were open-label, randomized, three-period, three-treatment, crossover studies, and study 3 was an open-label, non-randomized, sequential study in healthy subjects. RESULTS: Co-administration of saxagliptin with metformin, glyburide or pioglitazone did not result in clinically meaningful alterations in the pharmacokinetics of saxagliptin or its metabolite, 5-hydroxy saxagliptin. Following co-administration of saxagliptin, there were no clinically meaningful alterations in the pharmacokinetics of metformin, glyburide, pioglitazone or hydroxy-pioglitazone. Saxagliptin was generally safe and well tolerated when administered alone or in combination with metformin, glyburide or pioglitazone. CONCLUSIONS: Saxagliptin can be co-administered with metformin, glyburide or pioglitazone without a need for dose adjustment of either saxagliptin or these OADs.
Asunto(s)
Adamantano/análogos & derivados , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Dipéptidos/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/farmacología , Gliburida/farmacocinética , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacocinética , Metformina/farmacocinética , Tiazolidinedionas/farmacocinética , Adamantano/administración & dosificación , Adamantano/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Dipéptidos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/administración & dosificación , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Gliburida/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pioglitazona , Tiazolidinedionas/administración & dosificación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Possible effects of the atypical antipsychotic aripiprazole on the pharmacokinetics of standard antidepressant therapies (ADTs) were assessed in two open-label, non-randomised studies in healthy subjects (Studies 1 and 2) and two placebo-controlled studies in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) (Studies 3 and 4). Healthy subjects received venlafaxine 75 mg/day (Study 1; N = 38) or escitalopram 10 mg/ day (Study 2; N = 25) with the addition of aripiprazole 10-20 mg/day (10 mg/day fixed dose in Study 2) for 14 days. Patients with MDD (N = 498; Studies 3 and 4) received escitalopram (10-20 mg/day), fluoxetine (20-40 mg/day), paroxetine controlled-release (37.5-50 mg/day), sertraline (100-150 mg/day) or venlafaxine extended-release (150-225 mg/day) for 8 weeks plus placebo. Incomplete responders were randomised (1:1) to placebo or adjunctive aripiprazole 2-20 mg/day. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis of ADTs. Plasma concentration-time data from Studies 3 and 4 were combined for statistical analysis. In healthy subjects, point estimates [90% CI] for the ratios of geometric means of C( max) (venlafaxine 1.148 [1.083-1.217]; escitalopram 1.04 [0.99-1.09]) and AUC(TAU) (venlafaxine 1.183 [1.130-1.238]; escitalopram 1.07 [1.04-1.11]) indicated no meaningful increase in ADT exposure in the presence of aripiprazole. In patients, point estimates for mean plasma concentration ratios indicated no substantial effect of aripiprazole on any ADT escitalopram 0.970 [0.911-1.033], fluoxetine 1.177 [1.049-1.321], paroxetine 0.730 [0.598-0.892], sertraline 0.958 [0.887-1.035] or venlafaxine 0.966 [0.887-1.051]. Aripiprazole had no meaningful effects on the pharmacokinetics of standard ADTs in either healthy subjects or patients with MDD.