RESUMEN
With the emergence of endovascular surgery, there is a perception that open aortic procedures for aneurysmal and occlusive disease have become more difficult. To test this hypothesis, two consecutive groups of patients undergoing open aortic surgery for aneurysmal (AAA) and occlusive (AIOD) disease before and after the establishment of an endovascular program (EP) were analyzed. The pre-EP patient group (January 1996 through December 1997) consisted of 112 patients (52 with AAA, 60 with AIOD) and the post-EP patient group (January 2000 through December 2001) consisted of 142 patients (72 with AAA, 70 with AIOD). The pre-EP AAA group was compared with the post-EP AAA group and the pre-EP AIOD group was compared with the post-EP AIOD group. Factors analyzed included patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative outcomes. Statistical comparisons were carried out using Fisher's exact test for proportions and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for medians. There were no statistical differences in patient demographics between the pre-EP and post-EP groups, regardless of procedure. When considering AAA repair, there was a higher rate of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia in the pre-EP group and a higher number of total comorbidities per patient in the post-EP group. There was also an increased incidence of perioperative blood transfusion in the post-EP group. When considering open procedures for AIOD, there was an increased rate of hypertension and history of previous abdominal operation in the post-EP group. There also was an increased incidence of perioperative blood transfusion. Other than these factors, there were no statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-EP groups with regard to mortality, complication rate, length of procedure, blood loss, length of ICU stay, or length of hospital stay for either the aneurysmal patients or the occlusive disease patients. With only minor exception, endovascular surgery has not appreciably increased the complexity of open aortic operations performed for either AAA or AIOD.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/patología , Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/epidemiología , Comorbilidad/tendencias , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiología , Hipercolesterolemia/cirugía , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/cirugía , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendenciasRESUMEN
While elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has been shown to be safe in selected octogenarians, very little is known about the role of endovascular AAA exclusion in this high-risk cohort. A retrospective review of our vascular surgical registry from January 1996 to December 2001 revealed 51 octogenarians that underwent infrarenal AAA repair. Since 1999 all octogenarians who presented for AAA repair were evaluated for preferential endovascular stent graft placement. Over the 6-year period, 35 patients underwent standard open repair while 16 patients were found to be anatomic candidates for and were treated with an endovascular stent graft. Hospital and office charts were reviewed to compare the endovascular cohort to the standard open cohort. Factors considered included patient comorbidities, perioperative data, and operative outcomes. Statistical analysis was done using Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test. The median age for the entire group was 83 years. There were 11 females in the open group and 1 female in the endovascular group. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative patient comorbidities between groups. Total mortality for the entire series was 11.8 per cent but this included 5 ruptured AAAs, all of which patients died, and 11 additional AAAs that were symptomatic, of which 1 patient died. Total nonruptured mortality for the entire series was 2.2 per cent (0% for the endo-group and 3.3% for the open group). There were statistically significant differences between the endovascular versus the open groups when comparing aneurysm diameter (5.6 cm vs. 6.2 cm; P = 0.016), estimated blood loss (225 cc vs. 2100 cc; P < 0.001), ICU days (0 vs. 3; P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (2 days vs. 12 days; P < 0.001), and patients with blood transfusions (1 vs. 27; P < 0.001). When comparing postoperative morbidities, 4 of the endovascular patients (25%) and 25 of the open patients (68.6%) had a complication (P = 0.006). In conclusion, endovascular stent graft treatment of nonruptured infrarenal AAAs in octogenarians led to significantly better outcomes and should probably be considered the preferred treatment whenever anatomically appropriate. Endovascular exclusion of ruptured AAAs may potentially improve future outcomes in this high-risk group.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has complicated management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. While LC is routine, laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is not, and an algorithm to manage suspected choledocholithiasis has not been uniformly accepted. We evaluated current management of choledocholithiasis. Patients suspected of having CBD stones over a 2-year period were evaluated, and 42 studies in the literature were reviewed. Thirty-two patients were identified. Fourteen patients (44%) had LC with intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) with no preoperative studies. IOC revealed CBD stones in nine (64%). Seven had CBD exploration (CBDE) at cholecystectomy, and two had postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). CBDE was successful in five cases, and ERCP was successful in one. Eighteen patients (56%) underwent preoperative ERCP. Five (28%) had no CBD stones. ERCP removed stones in nine patients, and four had open CBDE after failed ERCP. Current literature supports LC with IOC without any preoperative studies. Laparoscopic CBDE is highly successful but depends on surgeon experience. Removing CBD stones with ERCP is also very successful but is associated with increased cost, hospital stay, and complications. We conclude that LC with IOC should be performed without preoperative ERCP when choledocholithiasis is suspected. If found, stones should be removed laparoscopically if possible.