Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 4(4): e004733, 2014 Apr 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24722200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The UK has the highest rate of teenage pregnancies in Western Europe, a fifth are repeat pregnancies. Unintended conceptions can result in emotional, psychological and educational harm to teenage girls, often with enduring implications for their life chances. Babies of teenage mothers have increased mortality in their first year and increased risk of poverty, educational underachievement and unemployment later in life, with associated societal costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a streamed, mixed-methods systematic review to find and evaluate interventions designed to reduce repeat unintended teen pregnancies. OUR AIMS ARE TO IDENTIFY:  Who is at greater risk of repeat unintended pregnancies? Which interventions are effective, cost-effective, how they work, in what setting and for whom? What are the barriers and facilitators to intervention uptake? Traditional electronic database searches will be augmented by targeted searches for evidence 'clusters' and guided by an advisory group of experts and stakeholders. To address the topic's inherent complexities, we will use a highly structured, innovative and iterative approach combining methodological techniques tailored to each stream of evidence. Quantitative data will be synthesised with reference to Cochrane guidelines for public health interventions. Qualitative evidence addressing facilitators and barriers to the uptake of interventions, experience and acceptability of interventions will be synthesised thematically. We will apply the principles of realist synthesis to uncover theories and mechanisms underpinning interventions. We will conduct an integration and overarching narrative of findings authenticated by client group feedback. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We will publish the complete review in 'Health Technology Assessment' and sections in specialist peer-reviewed journals. We will present at national and international conferences in the fields of public health, reproductive medicine and review methodology. Findings will be fed back to service users and practitioners via workshops run by the partner collaborators. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42012003168. COCHRANE REGISTRATION NUMBER: i=fertility/0068.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Embarazo en Adolescencia , Embarazo no Planeado , Adolescente , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Política de Salud/economía , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Reino Unido
2.
Br J Cancer ; 107(2): 243-54, 2012 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22699825

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A new protocol for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing within the UK cervical screening programme commenced in April 2011, creating new patient experiences. This is the first review to synthesise a substantial body of international evidence of women's information needs, views and preferences regarding HPV testing. We aimed to inform the development of educational materials to promote informed choice, reduce anxiety and improve disease control. METHODS: We searched 12 bibliographic databases. Two reviewers independently screened papers and assessed study quality; disagreements were resolved by discussion. Results were extracted verbatim and authors' findings treated as primary data. Studies were synthesised collaboratively using framework methods. RESULTS: We synthesised findings from 17 studies. Women had overwhelmingly negative concerns; an HPV diagnosis was daunting, had associated problems of disclosure of a sexually transmitted infection (STI), impacted on relationships and provoked fear of stigmatisation. Nevertheless, many thought HPV testing could be a preferable alternative to repeat cytology. Knowledge was poor; women struggled to interpret limited information in the context of existing knowledge about STIs and cervical cancer. CONCLUSION: Women are likely to be poorly informed, have limited understanding and many unanswered questions. This could increase anxiety and reduce ability to make informed choices, presenting a substantial challenge for those who design and provide information.


Asunto(s)
Cuello del Útero/virología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Papillomaviridae/química , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Ansiedad/psicología , Inglaterra , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Estereotipo , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA