Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Phlebology ; 35(5): 325-336, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31510866

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of sclerotherapy is to induce fibrosclerosis of superficial veins. We postulated that inadvertent entry of sclerosants into deep veins can result in sclerotic occlusion, deep vein sclerosis, a non-thrombotic process distinct from spontaneous deep vein thrombosis. The aim of this study was to assess the role of d-dimer in differentiating between deep vein sclerosis and deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: Proximal trunks of great and small saphenous veins were treated with endovenous laser ablation. Venous tributaries and perforators were treated with foam ultrasound guided sclerotherapy. Ultrasound studies of lower limb deep veins were performed before and one week after the procedures, to detect deep vein occlusions (DVOs). d-dimer levels were measured for DVOs and long-term ultrasound studies monitored the recanalisation rates. RESULTS: In a six-year period, 9143 procedures were performed in 1325 patients for bilateral varicose veins. This included 1124 endovenous laser ablation and 8019 foam ultrasound guided sclerotherapy procedures. A total of 259 DVOs (2.83%) were identified on ultrasound which included 251 deep vein sclerosis (2.74%), seven deep vein thrombosis (0.07%) and one endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT, 0.08%). d-dimer values <0.5 µg/mL excluded deep vein thrombosis s, 0.5-1.0 µg/mL were more likely to be associated with deep vein sclerosis and >1.0 µg/mL were a more likely to be associated with deep vein thrombosis. Lower sclerosant concentrations and higher foam volumes were associated with increased risk of DVO (p < .0001). No significant relationship was found between DVO and gender or thrombophilia. Deep vein thrombosis and EHIT cases but not deep vein sclerosis patients were anticoagulated. None had thromboembolic complications. Patients were followed up for a median of 299 days (37-1994 days). Recanalisation rates were 71.1% for deep vein sclerosis (92.3% competent) and 71.4% for deep vein thrombosis (60.0% competent). CONCLUSIONS: Deep vein sclerosis is a relatively benign clinical entity distinct from deep vein thrombosis and does not require anticoagulation. Majority of affected veins on long-term follow-up regain patency and competence. d-dimer can be used to assist in differentiating deep vein sclerosis from deep vein thrombosis.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Vena Safena/cirugía , Soluciones Esclerosantes/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Humanos , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Soluciones Esclerosantes/administración & dosificación , Esclerosis , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/sangre , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Venas/lesiones , Venas/patología , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/sangre , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA