RESUMEN
PURPOSE: COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure frequently require prolonged ventilatory support that would typically warrant early tracheostomy. There has been significant debate on timing, outcomes, and safety of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiological, hospital, and post-discharge outcomes of this cohort, based on early (ET) versus late (LT) tracheostomy. METHODS: Retrospective review (March 2020-January 2021) in a 5-hospital system of ventilated patients who underwent tracheostomy. Demographics, hospital/ICU length of stay (LOS), procedural characteristics, APACHE II scores at ICU admission, stabilization markers, and discharge outcomes were analyzed. Long-term decannulation rates were obtained from long-term acute care facility (LTAC) data. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients underwent tracheostomy (mean 61 years, 62% male, 64% Hispanic). Despite ET being frequently performed during active COVID infection (85% vs. 64%), there were no differences in complication types or rates versus LT. APACHE II scores at ICU admission were comparable for both groups; however, > 50% of LT patients met PEEP stability at tracheostomy. ET was associated with significantly shorter ICU and hospital LOS, ventilator days, and higher decannulation rates. Of the cohort discharged to an LTAC, 59% were ultimately decannulated, 36% were discharged home, and 41% were discharged to a skilled nursing facility. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first comprehensive analysis of ET and LT that includes LTAC outcomes and stabilization markers in relation to the tracheostomy. ET was associated with improved clinical outcomes and a short LOS, specifically on days of pre-tracheostomy ventilation and in-hospital decannulation rates.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del Paciente , Respiración Artificial , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Traqueostomía , Humanos , Traqueostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , APACHE , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There has been increasing use of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), but most literature demonstrate outcomes of single centers during the index hospitalization. We sought to analyze statewide patterns and longer-term outcomes after SSRF. METHODS: Adult patients with >1 rib fracture in the 2016-2018 California Office of Statewide Health Planning Database were identified. SSRF and non-operatively managed (NO) patients were matched on clinical and demographic variables. Patterns and outcomes of SSRF were assessed with multivariate modeling. RESULTS: 599 SSRF patients were matched to 1191 NO patients. Readmission and readmission complication rates were similar between the groups. In a competing risks regression, admission to a high-volume SSRF center (SHR 4.6, CI95 4.0-5.4, p = 0.01) was the primary predictor of SSRF. 30-day mortality adjusted risk was lower for the SSRF vs. NO group (HR 0.47, CI 0.25-0.88, p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Statewide utilization of SSRF varied widely and appears to be driven by center or surgeon characteristics rather than clinical factors. Efforts to expand access to SSRF based on clinical factors may be warranted.
Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente , Fracturas de las Costillas , Adulto , Fijación de Fractura , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de las Costillas/complicaciones , CostillasRESUMEN
Traumatic thoracic or chest wall hernias are relatively uncommon but highly challenging injuries that can be seen after a variety of injury mechanisms. Despite their description throughout history there remains scant literature on this topic that is primarily limited to case reports or series. Until recently, there also has been no effort to create a reliable grading system that can assess severity, predict outcomes, and guide the choice of surgical repair. The purpose of this article is to review the reported literature on this topic and to analyze the history, common injury mechanisms, likely presentations, and optimal management strategies to guide clinicians who are faced with these challenging cases. We also report a modified and updated version of our previously developed grading system for traumatic chest wall hernias that can be utilized to guide surgical management techniques and approaches.