RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To systematically review (1) biomechanical properties of augmented elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair compared with reconstruction and (2) clinical efficacy and complication rates of UCL repair with and without augmentation. METHODS: A systematic review was completed August 15, 2023, identifying articles that (1) biomechanically compared suture augmented UCL repair and reconstruction and (2) clinically evaluated medial elbow UCL repairs. Search terms included: "UCL repair" OR "internal brace" OR "suture augmentation" AND "UCL reconstruction." For inclusion, biomechanical studies compared augmented repair with reconstruction; clinical studies required clinical outcomes with minimum 6-month follow-up. Biomechanical data included torsional stiffness, gap formation, peak torque, and failure torque. Clinical data included return to previous level of play, time to return, functional outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: In total, 8 biomechanical and 9 clinical studies were included (5 with and 4 without augmentation). In most biomechanical studies, augmented repairs demonstrated less gap formation, with equivalent torsional stiffness, failure load, and peak torque compared with reconstruction. Clinical outcomes in 104 patients without augmentation demonstrated return to previous level of 50% to 94% for nonprofessional athletes and 29% for professional baseball pitchers. Suture augmented repairs in 554 patients demonstrated return to previous level from 92% to 96%, at 3.8 to 7.4 months, with Kerlan Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic scores of 86 to 95. The overall complication rate for augmented UCL repair was 8.7%; most commonly ulnar neuropraxia (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanically, UCL repair with augmentation provided less gapping with equivalent torsional stiffness and failure compared with reconstruction. Clinically, augmented UCL repair demonstrated excellent return to previous level of play and Kerlan Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic scores with modest complications and time to return. Augmented UCL repair is biomechanically equivalent to reconstruction and may be a viable alternative to reconstruction in indicated athletes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: UCL repair with suture augmentation is biomechanically equivalent to reconstruction and clinically demonstrates excellent outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Béisbol , Ligamento Colateral Cubital , Ligamentos Colaterales , Articulación del Codo , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Colateral Cubital , Humanos , Codo/cirugía , Ligamento Colateral Cubital/cirugía , Cúbito/cirugía , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Suturas , Ligamentos Colaterales/cirugíaRESUMEN
Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screw fixation is an emerging technique for treatment of degenerative spine disease which requires either intraoperative fluoroscopy or intraoperative CT guidance (iCT). To date, there has been no direct comparison of these two navigation modalities; here we compare fluoroscopic versus iCT navigation for CBT pedicle screw fixation. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent CBT screw fixation with either fluoroscopic or iCT guidance for lumbar degenerative disease by the senior author. Trajectory-related complications such as medial or lateral breach were compared on postoperative CT, in addition to the incidence of trajectory-related dural tear. We also compared general surgical complications such as postoperative infection and decompression related durotomies. Thirty-eight patients (19 fluoroscopic, 19 CT-guided) who underwent placement of 182 cortical screws (88 fluoroscopic, 94 CT-guided) were identified. In terms of trajectory-related complications, the iCT cohort had fewer medial breaches (1/94) compared to the fluoroscopic cohort (6/88) (p = 0.05). Each group had one lateral breach (p = 0.73). There was one case of CSF leak from screw placement in the fluoroscopic cohort, but none in the iCT cohort (p = 0.48). Overall, there were eight trajectory-related complications in the fluoroscopic cohort versus two in the iCT cohort (p = 0.04). Our data suggests statistically significant decreased trajectory-related complications with iCT-guided CBT screw fixation as compared to fluoroscopically guided. In terms of general surgical complications, while we observed increased postoperative infections in our fluoroscopic cohort, there was no statistically significant difference.
Asunto(s)
Fluoroscopía/métodos , Tornillos Pediculares/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Hueso Cortical/cirugía , Fluoroscopía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients are known to have a high rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and additional neuromuscular blockade or barbiturate coma therapy has the theoretical risk of exacerbating baseline hemostasis and elevating the incidence of thromboembolic events. We conducted a single-institution retrospective review of patients surviving severe TBI, as determined by need for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, who further required paralytics or barbiturate therapy to maintain ICP control. Patients were administered VTE prophylaxis as clinically appropriate. Predictors for VTE were subsequently determined with univariate and logistic multivariate regression analyses. The main cohort includes 144 patients, 34 of whom received pharmaceutical immobilization for ICP control. Mean ISS and GCS at intake were 31.9 and 5.2, respectively. Among those receiving vs not-receiving paralytics and/or barbiturate therapy, there was a statistical difference of 12/34 (35.3%) vs 18/110 (16.4%, p = 0.0280) in VTE events, at a mean time greater than two weeks from the time of trauma. Multivariate logistics regression indicated 3.2 times increased odds of developing a VTE (log odds = 1.17, p = 0.023). No pediatric patients were positive for an event (0/12 vs 7/22, p = 0.0356), and infections were only documented among those with VTE (0/22 vs 4/12, p = 0.0107). Overall, paralytics and barbiturate therapy were correlated with a higher incidence of VTE among TBI patients. Although the need for ICP control will outweigh an increase in thromboembolic risk, there is value for increased surveillance and screening during the prolonged inpatient stay of these patients.