RESUMEN
The aim of the study was to compare conventional tracheostomy with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients with inhalation burn injury. A total of 37 patients with severe burn injuries and associated inhalation injury, underwent percutaneous tracheostomy in our burn unit and were retrospectively compared with 22 patients who underwent conventional surgical tracheostomy. In the first group, 25 of 37 patients and in the second group 17 of 22 patients presented with partial or full-thickness burn injuries (or both) in the neck region. The cost of the procedure, operating time, complications, and incidence of pulmonary infection were recorded. There were no significant perioperative complications in the percutaneous tracheostomy group, and no patient required surgical revision or conversion to surgical tracheostomy. In the conventional tracheostomy group, 2 patients developed tracheal stenosis, 1 had a tracheoesophageal fistula, and 10 had stomal infections. The average procedure time in the first group was 9 minutes, and in the second group it was 22 minutes. The cost of the bedside percutaneous tracheostomy was one-fifth the cost of a conventional tracheostomy. The incidence of pulmonary sepsis was 45% after percutaneous tracheostomy compared to 68% after conventional tracheostomy. With the percutaneous technique, spontaneous closure of the stoma occurred within 1 to 3 days after removal of the tracheostomy tube, whereas with the conventional technique it was within 5 to 7 days. Percutaneous tracheostomy is associated with a lower complication rate and can be safely performed at the bedside. Moreover, it is faster and can be done at a lower cost than conventional open tracheostomy.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras por Inhalación/cirugía , Traqueostomía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Quemaduras/mortalidad , Quemaduras/patología , Quemaduras/terapia , Quemaduras por Inhalación/mortalidad , Quemaduras por Inhalación/patología , Dilatación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Traumatismos del Cuello/mortalidad , Traumatismos del Cuello/patología , Traumatismos del Cuello/terapia , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traqueostomía/efectos adversos , Traqueostomía/economíaRESUMEN
Penis resurfacing is a challenging procedure, and should simultaneously ensure erectile function, tactile sensibility, sexual satisfaction, and aesthetic integrity. This article presents three cases with penile skin defects treated by means of a pedicled fascia lata attached either to the tensor fascia lata (one case) or an anterolateral thigh flap (two cases). The cause of the wounds included electrical burn, Fournier's gangrene, and self-mutilation. The size of flaps ranged from 10-13 cm in width and 15-30 cm in length. All flaps included vascularized fascia lata, which covered part or the circumference of the penis. All flaps survived completely. The lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh was included in the designed flaps in all instances, and normal protective sensation was recorded postoperatively. The patients reported normal erectile function and ability to perform intercourse. The flaps, though relatively bulky and hairy, had a good color and texture match with the penis and suprapubic region. Based on our limited experience, we believe that the anterolateral thigh flap has greater dimensions with a longer pedicle, and allows for greater flexibility in flap design compared to the tensor fascia lata flap. An anterolateral thigh flap can be safely thinned in a second stage, and it is our flap of choice for penis resurfacing.