Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Screen ; 29(1): 38-43, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34266324

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare abnormal call rates (ACR), cancer detection rates (CDR), positive predictive values (PPVs), and annual return to screen recommendations after switching from digital mammography (DM) to digital breast tomosynthesis plus DM (DBT + DM) for breast cancer screening. SETTING: The Alberta Breast Cancer Screening Program collects screening data from clinics throughout the province of Alberta, Canada. METHODS: This study retrospectively collected data, between 2015 and 2018, on women aged 40+ who underwent breast cancer screening at two large volume multisite radiology groups to compare metrics one year prior and one year after DBT + DM implementation. Comparisons between modalities were carried out within age groups, within breast density categories, and for initial vs. subsequent screens. RESULTS: A total of 125,432 DM and 128,912 DBT + DM screening exams were performed. For women aged 50-74, the DBT + DM group had a higher ACR (p < 0.01) but lower annual return to screens (p < 0.01). CDR was higher post-DBT + DM implementation for women with scattered (6.0 per 1000 vs. 4.4 per 1000; p = 0.001) or heterogeneously dense breasts (6.5 per 1000 vs. 4.2 per 1000; p < 0.001). PPV was higher with DBT + DM for all age groups, with women 50-74 having a PPV of 8.3% using DBT + DM vs. 7.1% with DM (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: All metrics improved or stayed the same after switching to DBT + DM except for ACR. However, the increase in ACR could be attributed to a trend already occurring prior to the switch. Longer term monitoring is needed to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Alberta/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Tamizaje Masivo , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 18(48): 7341-7, 2012 Dec 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23326143

RESUMEN

AIM: To compare early use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with endoscopic treatment (ET) for the prophylaxis of recurrent variceal bleeding. METHODS: In-patient data were collected from 190 patients between January 2007 and June 2010 who suffured from variceal bleeding. Patients who were older than 75 years; previously received surgical treatment or endoscopic therapy for variceal bleeding; and complicated with hepatic encephalopathy or hepatic cancer, were excluded from this research. Thirty-five cases lost to follow-up were also excluded. Retrospective analysis was done in 126 eligible cases. Among them, 64 patients received TIPS (TIPS group) while 62 patients received endoscopic therapy (ET group). The relevant data were collected by patient review or telephone calls. The occurrence of rebleeding, hepatic encephalopathy or other complications, survival rate and cost of treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 and 18.7 mo in TIPS and ET groups, respectively), rebleeding from any source occurred in 11 patients in the TIPS group as compared with 31 patients in the ET group (Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test, P = 0.000). Rebleeding rates at any time point (6 wk, 1 year and 2 year) in the TIPS group were lower than in the ET group (Bonferroni correction α' = α/3). Eight patients in the TIPS group and 16 in the ET group died with the cumulative survival rates of 80.6% and 64.9% (Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test χ(2) = 4.864, P = 0.02), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to 6-wk survival rates (Bonferroni correction α' = α/3). However, significant differences were observed between the two groups in the 1-year survival rates (92% and 79%) and the 2-year survival rates (89% and 64.9%) (Bonferroni correction α' = α/3). No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups in the occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy (12 patients in TIPS group and 5 in ET group, Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test, χ(2) = 3.103, P = 0.08). The average total cost for the TIPS group was higher than for ET group (Wilcxon-Mann Whitney test, 52 678 RMB vs 38,844 RMB, P < 0.05), but hospitalization frequency and hospital stay during follow-up period were lower (Wilcxon-Mann Whitney test, 0.4 d vs 1.3 d, P = 0.01; 5 d vs 19 d, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Early use of TIPS is more effective than endoscopic treatment in preventing variceal rebleeding and improving survival rate, and does not increase occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/métodos , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/cirugía , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Cianoacrilatos/química , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipertensión Portal , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Recurrencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA