Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(1): 127-133, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-840809

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objectives To study the usefulness of MRI in preoperative evaluation of PFUDD. Can MRI provide additional information on urethral distraction defect (UDD) and cause of erectile dysfunction (ED)? Materials and Methods In this prospective study, consecutive male patients presenting with PFUDD were included from Feb 2011 till Dec 2012. Those with traumatic spinal cord injury and pre-existing ED were excluded. Patients were assessed using IIEF questionnaire, retrograde urethrogram and micturating cystourethrogram (RGU+MCU) and MRI pelvis. Primary end point was erectile function and secondary end point was surgical outcome. Results Twenty patients were included in this study. Fourteen patients (70%) were ≤40years; fifteen patients (75%) had ED, seven patients (35%) had severe ED. MRI findings associated with ED were longer median UDD (23mm vs. 15mm, p=0.07), cavernosal injury (100%, p=0.53), rectal injury (100%, p=0.53), retropubic scarring (60%, p=0.62) and prostatic displacement (60%, p=0.99). Twelve patients (60%) had a good surgical outcome, five (25%) had an acceptable outcome, three (15%) had a poor outcome. Poor surgical outcome was associated with rectal injury (66.7%, p=0.08), cavernosal injury (25%, p=0.19), retropubic scarring (18.1%, p=0.99) and prostatic displacement (16.7%, p=0.99). Five patients with normal erections had good surgical outcome. Three patients with ED had poor outcome (20%, p=0.20). Conclusions MRI did not offer significant advantage over MCU in the subgroup of men with normal erections. Cavernosal injury noted on MRI strongly correlated with ED. Role of MRI may be limited to the subgroup with ED or an inconclusive MCU.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Pelvis/lesiones , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Uretra/lesiones , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Uretrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Próstata/fisiopatología , Enfermedades de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Uretra/cirugía , Uretra/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Uretrales/cirugía , Enfermedades Uretrales/fisiopatología , Micción/fisiología , Radiografía , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Periodo Preoperatorio , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Disfunción Eréctil/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Int Braz J Urol ; 43(1): 127-133, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28124535

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study the usefulness of MRI in preoperative evaluation of PFUDD. Can MRI provide additional information on urethral distraction defect (UDD) and cause of erectile dysfunction (ED)? MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, consecutive male patients presenting with PFUDD were included from Feb 2011 till Dec 2012. Those with traumatic spinal cord injury and pre-existing ED were excluded. Patients were assessed using IIEF questionnaire, retrograde urethrogram and micturating cystourethrogram (RGU+MCU) and MRI pelvis. Primary end point was erectile function and secondary end point was surgical outcome. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included in this study. Fourteen patients (70%) were ≤40years; fifteen patients (75%) had ED, seven patients (35%) had severe ED. MRI findings associated with ED were longer median UDD (23mm vs. 15mm, p=0.07), cavernosal injury (100%, p=0.53), rectal injury (100%, p=0.53), retropubic scarring (60%, p=0.62) and prostatic displacement (60%, p=0.99). Twelve patients (60%) had a good surgical outcome, five (25%) had an acceptable outcome, three (15%) had a poor outcome. Poor surgical outcome was associated with rectal injury (66.7%, p=0.08), cavernosal injury (25%, p=0.19), retropubic scarring (18.1%, p=0.99) and prostatic displacement (16.7%, p=0.99). Five patients with normal erections had good surgical outcome. Three patients with ED had poor outcome (20%, p=0.20). CONCLUSIONS: MRI did not offer significant advantage over MCU in the subgroup of men with normal erections. Cavernosal injury noted on MRI strongly correlated with ED. Role of MRI may be limited to the subgroup with ED or an inconclusive MCU.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis/lesiones , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagen , Uretra/lesiones , Enfermedades Uretrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Disfunción Eréctil/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pelvis/cirugía , Proyectos Piloto , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Próstata/fisiopatología , Radiografía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uretra/fisiopatología , Uretra/cirugía , Enfermedades Uretrales/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Uretrales/cirugía , Micción/fisiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA