RESUMEN
Achondroplasia, the most common form of disproportionate short stature, is caused by a variant in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene. Advances in drug treatment for achondroplasia have underscored the need to better understand the natural history of this condition. This article provides a critical review and discussion of the natural history of achondroplasia based on current literature evidence and the perspectives of clinicians with extensive knowledge and practical experience in managing individuals with this diagnosis. This review draws evidence from recent and ongoing longitudinal natural history studies, supplemented with relevant cross-sectional studies where longitudinal research is lacking, to summarize the current knowledge on the nature, incidence, chronology, and interrelationships of achondroplasia-related comorbidities across the lifespan. When possible, data related to adults are presented separately from data specific to children and adolescents. Gaps in knowledge regarding clinical care are identified and areas for future research are recommended and discussed.
Asunto(s)
Acondroplasia , Foramen Magno , Acondroplasia/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Estudios LongitudinalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pragmatic use of the anti-fibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the United States (US) has not been studied and may be different from international settings due to structural differences between health care systems. This study examined the relationship between patient- and site-level characteristics and anti-fibrotic (a) use and (b) selection. METHODS: Data from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry was used to perform univariable and multivariable regressions with generalized linear mixed models. A random effects model examined registry site variation. RESULTS: 703 of 1218 (57.7%) patients were taking a single anti-fibrotic of which 312 (44.4%) were taking nintedanib and 391 (55.6%) were taking pirfenidone. Up to 25% of patients using an anti-fibrotic may have been excluded from clinical trial participation due to having too severe disease as measured by diffusion limitation for carbon monoxide. Age (OR = 0.974, p = 0.0086) and diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (per 10% increase in percent-predicted; OR = 0.896, p = 0.0007) was negatively associated with anti-fibrotic use while time (in log of days) since diagnosis (OR = 1.138, p < 0.0001), recent patient clinical trial participation (OR = 1.569, p = 0.0433) and oxygen use (OR = 1.604, p = 0.0027) was positively associated with anti-fibrotic use. Time (log of days) since diagnosis (OR = 1.075, p = 0.0477), history of coronary artery disease (OR = 1.796, p = 0.0030), presence of pulmonary hypertension (OR = 2.139, p = 0.0376), patient clinical trial participation in the prior 12 months (OR = 2.485, p = 0.0002), diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (per 10% increase in percent-predicted; OR = 1.138, p = 0.0184), anticoagulant use (OR = 2.507, p = 0.0028), and enrollment at a registry site in the Midwest region (OR = 1.600, p = 0.0446) were associated with pirfenidone use. Anti-fibrotic use varied by registry site. Rates of discontinuation were modest and nearly identical for the two medications with side effects being the most common reason given for discontinuation. Twenty-three percent (23%, 274) of persons with IPF were using or had recently used an immunomodulatory agent. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides a detailed characterization of IPF treatment patterns in the US; many users of anti-fibrotic medications may not have qualified for inclusion in clinical trials. More research is needed to understand variations in medical decision-making for use and selection of anti-fibrotic medication.
Asunto(s)
Fundaciones/tendencias , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/epidemiología , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente/tendencias , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
A multidimensional approach involving consideration of available resources, individual patient characteristics, patient preferences, and cost of treatment is often required to optimize clinical decision making in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). In order to bring together varying perspectives on effective tactics and to formulate innovative strategies to improve the management of AF, a think tank consortium of advisors was assembled from across the spectrum of health care stakeholders. Focus groups were conducted and facilitated by a moderator and a notetaker. Participants were asked to comment on preliminary data for the increased prevalence of AF, patterns of treatment, impact of adherence with anticoagulants on clinical and economic outcomes, and opportunities for optimizing treatment.Several recommendations to reach short- and long-term goals in improving AF management emerged from the focus group discussions. These recommendations specifically targeted 3 stakeholder groups--patients/caregivers, physicians, and payers--and addressed the need for better understanding of determinants of undertreatment and nonadherence for those on anticoagulation therapy. Recommendations included the use of real-world data studies to understand regional and demographic patterns of treatment and outcomes, the development of an enhanced national quality standard for anticoagulation, and engaging patients in shared decision making to optimize satisfaction with treatment. Actionable strategies were presented to address gaps related to anticoagulation management. Balancing new anticoagulants' higher prescription costs and safety concerns with their superior effectiveness and convenience of administration for at-risk individuals would require a concerted effort involving patients and their caregivers, physicians, and payers.