Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(17)2024 Aug 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39273323

RESUMEN

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by its poor prognosis. The current challenge remains the absence of predictive biomarkers. Cytokines are crucial factors in the pathogenesis and prognosis of PDAC. Furthermore, there is growing interest in differentiating between molecular subtypes of PDAC. The aim of our study is to evaluate the association between the analyzed cytokines and the molecular subtypes of PDAC and to determine their prognostic value. Cytokine levels were measured in 73 patients, and molecular subtypes were analyzed in 34 of these patients. Transforming Growth Factor Beta 2 (TGF-ß2) levels were independently associated with the basal-like and null subtypes. In patients with locally advanced and metastatic PDAC, elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, and IL-15 were associated with a higher risk of progression during first-line treatment, and increased levels of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, and IL-15 were related to increased mortality. Furthermore, a significant association was observed between higher percentiles of IL-6 and IL-8 and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) during first-line treatment, and between higher percentiles of IL-8 and shorter overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, only elevated levels of IL-8 were independently associated with a higher risk of progression during first-line treatment and mortality. In conclusion, the results of our study suggest that cytokine expression varies according to the molecular subtype of PDAC and that cytokines also play a relevant role in patient prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Citocinas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Citocinas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto
2.
Br J Cancer ; 130(10): 1670-1678, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38486123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium established four Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) in colorectal cancer: CMS1 (microsatellite-instability [MSI], Immune), CMS2 (Canonical, epithelial), CMS3 (Metabolic), and CMS4 (Mesenchymal). However, only MSI tumour patients have seen a change in their disease management in clinical practice. This study aims to characterise the proteome of colon cancer CMS and broaden CMS's clinical utility. METHODS: One-hundred fifty-eight paraffin samples from stage II-III colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were analysed through DIA-based mass-spectrometry proteomics. RESULTS: CMS1 exhibited overexpression of immune-related proteins, specifically related to neutrophils, phagocytosis, antimicrobial response, and a glycolytic profile. These findings suggested potential therapeutic strategies involving immunotherapy and glycolytic inhibitors. CMS3 showed overexpression of metabolic proteins. CMS2 displayed a heterogeneous protein profile. Notably, two proteomics subtypes within CMS2, with different protein characteristics and prognoses, were identified. CMS4 emerged as the most distinct group, featuring overexpression of proteins related to angiogenesis, extracellular matrix, focal adhesion, and complement activation. CMS4 showed a high metastatic profile and suggested possible chemoresistance that may explain its worse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: DIA proteomics revealed new features for each colon cancer CMS subtype. These findings provide valuable insights into potential therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer subtypes in the future.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Proteómica , Humanos , Proteómica/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/genética , Neoplasias del Colon/metabolismo , Femenino , Masculino , Pronóstico , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética
3.
Gastric Cancer ; 27(1): 131-145, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37964032

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in young adults (GCYA) counts for 10-15% of diagnoses. Previous studies have mainly focused on surgical outcomes in patients with resectable tumors; however, systemic therapy for advanced GCYA remains under-evaluated. This study aims to assess the efficacy-related outcomes and safety of first-line chemotherapy (CT) in younger versus older patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry treated with first-line polychemotherapy between January 2008 and October 2022 were included. We compared clinicopathological features, therapies received, efficacy-related outcomes, and toxicity between individuals aged < and ≥ 45 years. RESULTS: Out of 3386 patients, 263 (7.8%) were < 45 years. Young patients exhibited a higher proportion of females affected, lower ECOG-PS ≥ 2, fewer comorbidities, and more aggressive disease-related features, such as higher proportion of diffuse subtype, signet-ring cells, plastic linitis, grade 3, peritoneal metastases and metastatic disease at diagnosis. They received more triple-agent combinations and underwent more surgeries in metastatic setting. No significant differences were observed between groups in overall response rate (53.1% vs. 52.3% in < and ≥ 45 years, respectively, p = 0.579), progression-free survival (6.1 vs. 6.83 months, p = 0.158) and overall survival (11.07 vs. 10.81 months, p = 0.82), even after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Grade 3-4 adverse events were comparable in both groups, although toxicity leading to treatment discontinuation was more frequent in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, younger patients with GCYA exhibited more aggressive clinicopathological features, and despite receiving more aggressive treatments, similar efficacy outcomes and toxicity profiles were achieved compared to their older counterparts. In the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, GEAC in < 45 years showed more aggressive clinicopathological features and, although treated with more intense first-line CT regimens, similar efficacy outcomes and toxicity were achieved compared to older patients.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Anciano , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Sistema de Registros
4.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(12): 3519-3526, dec. 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-227296

RESUMEN

Background Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumours. Several drugs and combinations have been used in clinical practice as second-line (2L) and third-line (3L) treatment. The growth modulation index (GMI) has previously been used as an exploratory efficacy endpoint of drug activity and represents an intra-patient comparison. Methods We performed a real-world retrospective study including all patients with advanced STS who had received at least 2 different lines of treatment for advanced disease between 2010 and 2020 at a single institution. The objective was to study the efficacy of both 2L and 3L treatments, analysing the time to progression (TTP) and the GMI (defined as the ratio of TTP between 2 consecutive lines of therapy). Results Eighty-one patients were included. The median TTP after 2L and 3L treatment was 3.16 and 3.06 months, and the median GMI was 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. The regimens most frequently used in both treatments were trabectedin, gemcitabine-dacarbazine, gemcitabine-docetaxel, pazopanib and ifosfamide. The median TTP by each of these regimens was 2.80, 2.23, 2.83, 4.10, and 5.00 months, and the median GMI was 0.78, 0.73, 0.67, 1.08, and 0.94, respectively. In terms of histotype, we highlight the activity (GMI > 1.33) of gemcitabine-dacarbazine in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and in leiomyosarcoma, pazopanib in UPS, and ifosfamide in synovial sarcoma. Conclusions In our cohort, regimens commonly used after first-line STS treatment showed only slight differences in efficacy, although we found significant activity of specific regimens by histotype (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , /uso terapéutico , Ifosfamida/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 25(12): 3519-3526, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37329429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumours. Several drugs and combinations have been used in clinical practice as second-line (2L) and third-line (3L) treatment. The growth modulation index (GMI) has previously been used as an exploratory efficacy endpoint of drug activity and represents an intra-patient comparison. METHODS: We performed a real-world retrospective study including all patients with advanced STS who had received at least 2 different lines of treatment for advanced disease between 2010 and 2020 at a single institution. The objective was to study the efficacy of both 2L and 3L treatments, analysing the time to progression (TTP) and the GMI (defined as the ratio of TTP between 2 consecutive lines of therapy). RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included. The median TTP after 2L and 3L treatment was 3.16 and 3.06 months, and the median GMI was 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. The regimens most frequently used in both treatments were trabectedin, gemcitabine-dacarbazine, gemcitabine-docetaxel, pazopanib and ifosfamide. The median TTP by each of these regimens was 2.80, 2.23, 2.83, 4.10, and 5.00 months, and the median GMI was 0.78, 0.73, 0.67, 1.08, and 0.94, respectively. In terms of histotype, we highlight the activity (GMI > 1.33) of gemcitabine-dacarbazine in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and in leiomyosarcoma, pazopanib in UPS, and ifosfamide in synovial sarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, regimens commonly used after first-line STS treatment showed only slight differences in efficacy, although we found significant activity of specific regimens by histotype.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Ifosfamida/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/patología , Gemcitabina , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA