RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis-related fractures represent a major health problem. Although spine and hip bone densitometry is the gold standard to assess bone density, this test is not always accesible. The purpose of this study was to describe two options to assess the risk of fracture due to osteoporosis in post-menopausal women assigned to a primary care unit where bone densitometry is not available. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 332 post-menopausal women without diagnosis or treatment for osteoporosis, attending regularly to a primary care unit. A heel bone peripheral densitometry, physical exam and medical history were performed. The assessment of fracture risk was carried out using the FRAX™ method. RESULTS: Mean age was 60 ± 8.7 years and body mass index was 28.68 ± 4.24. According to the heel bone peripheral densitometry, 19 (5.7 %) women had osteoporosis (T-score less than or equal to -2.5), 171 (51.8 %) had osteopenia (T-score between -2.5 and less than or equal to -1) and 141 (42.5 %) had normal bone mineral density. According to the FRAX method, 13 (3.9 %) had an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture in a 10-year period and 40 (12 %) of hip fracture. CONCLUSIONS: There was low concordance in the 10-year risk for major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture assessed with both the FRAX™ and the peripheral bone densitometry methods.
INTRODUCCIÓN: las fracturas relacionadas con la osteoporosis son un problema de salud. Aunque la densitometría ósea de columna y cadera es el estándar para evaluar la densidad ósea, no siempre es accesible. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir dos alternativas a la densitometría ósea para evaluar el riesgo de fractura por osteoporosis en mujeres posmenopáusicas. MÉTODOS: estudio transversal de 332 mujeres posmenopáusicas sin diagnóstico o tratamiento de osteoporosis, que asistían regularmente a una unidad de primer nivel. Se realizó densitometría periférica de talón, examen físico e historia médica. La evaluación del riesgo de fractura se llevó a cabo mediante FRAXTM. RESULTADOS: la edad media fue de 60 ± 8.7 años y el índice de masa corporal de 28.68 ± 4.24. Según la densitometría periférica de talón, mujeres 19 (5.7 %) tenían osteoporosis (T-score menor de 2.5), 171 (51.8 %) osteopenia (T-score entre 2.5 y menos de 1) y 141 (42.5 %) densidad mineral ósea normal. Según el método FRAX, 13 (3.9 %) tenían riesgo aumentado de fractura osteoporótica en un periodo de 10 años y 40 (12 %) de fractura de cadera. CONCLUSIONES: la prevalencia de riesgo para osteoporosis es diferente de acuerdo con el método que se utilice para medirlo. La concordancia entre los dos métodos fue baja.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Indicadores de Salud , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/diagnóstico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Anciano , Densidad Ósea , Estudios Transversales , Densitometría , Femenino , Humanos , Anamnesis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/complicaciones , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Examen Físico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of death secondary to malignancy in women. It ranks third in mortality in women in reproductive age, produced by non-modifiable (genetic and hormonal) and modifiable factors. Our objective was to describe and analyze the epidemiological characteristics of deaths from BC in the State of Mexico. RESULTS: of 273 verbal autopsies, the most common age (23.07 %) was between 40 and 49 years. The educational level of schooling were complete elementary school (20.51 %), incomplete elementary school (19.04 %) and complete high school (13.91 %). the institution with the highest number of patients was the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social with 139 (50.91 %). The towns with a higher frequency were Malinalco, Ayapango, Atizapán, Zacualpan and Apaxco. The Mortality was higher in Valle de Bravo, Coatepec Harinas and Toluca. CONCLUSIONS: the increase in BC has permitted the emergence of a new hypothesis known as endocrine disruption, according to this premise, this results from exposure to chemicals introduced into the environment by human activity capable of altering the hormonal balance.