RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two different cavity disinfection procedures (chlorhexidine gluconate-based cavity disinfectant and Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation) on the bond strength of two different types of adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond 2 [SB] and Clearfil SE Bond [SE]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty human third molars were ground flat to expose midcoronal dentin. After the dentin surfaces were polished with 600-grit silicon carbide paper, the teeth were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 5) according to the cavity disinfection procedure and the adhesive resin: Group I, etch and rinse adhesive (SB); Group II, self-etch adhesive (SE); Group III, cavity disinfectant application (cavity cleanser) + SB; Group IV, cavity disinfectant application + SE; Group V, laser irradiation (Er,Cr:YSGG laser, 20 Hz; 0.75 W; 15% water, 15% air) + SB; Group VI, laser irradiation + SE. For each group, the composite crown was incrementally fabricated with a composite resin. Following storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, the bonded specimens were serially sectioned into rectangular beams (n = 32). Bond strengths were determined using a microtensile tester at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were performed using post hoc Duncan's test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Cavity disinfectant application and laser irradiation produced significantly higher bond strength values compared to the control group for SB. For SE, only laser irradiation improved the bond strength values compared to the control. There was a statistically significant decrease in the bond strength values of the specimens that were subjected to cavity disinfectant before SE application. The failure mode was mainly adhesive in all groups. CONCLUSION: Cavity disinfectant application and laser irradiation may influence bond strength, depending on the adhesive system used. As a cavity-disinfecting procedure, laser irradiation might enhance the bond strength of etch and rinse and self-etch adhesive systems.
Asunto(s)
Cicloheximida/farmacología , Preparación de la Cavidad Dental/métodos , Cementos Dentales/efectos de la radiación , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Rayos Láser , Desinfección/métodos , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Resistencia a la Tracción/efectos de los fármacos , Resistencia a la Tracción/efectos de la radiaciónRESUMEN
AIM: The purpose of this case report is to describe the re-attachment of an anterior tooth fragment using a self-etching adhesive. BACKGROUND: Fracture of anterior teeth by trauma is a common problem in children and teenagers due to their active lifestyle. Restoration of these teeth often presents a challenge because of the large pulp in young teeth and open apical foramen depending on the age of the child. New dental adhesive materials offer an alternative solution for the treatment of some anterior tooth fractures. REPORT: A 17-year-old female patient presented for treatment of a fractured maxillary left central incisor. The clinical examination revealed the exposure of dentin, but there was no exposure of the pulp. The patient saved the tooth fragment making it available for re-attachment to the remaining tooth structure. Under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation the tooth fragment was re-attached using a self-etching adhesive and a microhybrid composite. SUMMARY: The re-attached tooth fragment was assessed clinically, radiographically, and using photographs at one, six, 12, 24, and 36 month intervals. The tooth remained vital, and there was no change in the color of the tooth at the three-year recall.
Asunto(s)
Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo/métodos , Incisivo/lesiones , Corona del Diente/lesiones , Fracturas de los Dientes/terapia , Grabado Ácido Dental/métodos , Resinas Acrílicas/uso terapéutico , Adhesivos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Resinas Compuestas/uso terapéutico , Recubrimientos Dentinarios/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Incisivo/diagnóstico por imagen , Poliuretanos/uso terapéutico , Radiografía , Corona del Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de los Dientes/diagnóstico por imagen , Reimplante Dental/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets after acid etching, laser ablation, self-etching primer application, and combined treatments. METHODS: One hundred defect-free premolars were randomly assigned to five groups. The teeth received the following treatments: group 1: phosphoric acid + Transbond XT primer; group 2: Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer (TPSEP); group 3: Er:YAG laser ablation + Transbond XT primer; group 4: Er:YAG laser ablation + phosphoric acid + Transbond XT primer; and group 5: Er:YAG laser ablation + TPSEP. Transbond XT Adhesive Paste was used in all groups for bracket bonding. Samples were stored in deionized water at 37 degrees C for 24 h. The shear debonding test was performed at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Failed brackets were examined by a stereomicroscope at 16 x magnification to determine the bond failure interface using a modified adhesive remnant index (ARI). SBS values were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for ARI scores and pairwise comparisons were done using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Mean SBS values (MPa) and standard deviations for the groups were: group 1, 13.18 +/- 3.45; group 2, 13.52 +/- 4.38; group 3, 10.33 +/- 4.74; group 4, 13.00 +/- 3.47; and group 5, 12.46 +/- 6.31. No significant differences were observed in the SBS of all the groups evaluated, but there was a significant difference in ARI scores, with group 3 showing higher ARI scores than groups 1 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Er:YAG laser ablation and self-etching primer application showed similar SBS values as conventional acidetching for bonding brackets.