RESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of press-fabricated lithium disilicate crowns with that of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) lithium disilicate crowns to determine if the fabrication method has an influence on marginal fit. The marginal fit of 25 pressed and 25 CAD/CAM crowns was measured using the replica technique. The sites measured were the mesial, distal, facial, and lingual margins. A microscope at 10× magnification was used to obtain the measurements. Each site was measured 4 times, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess measurement errors. An unpaired t test was used to evaluate the differences between the 2 groups. Mean marginal gap measurements were greater for CAD/CAM crowns than for pressed crowns at all sites. Only the difference in mean gap at the facial margin was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Press-fabricated lithium disilicate crowns provided a better marginal fit than those fabricated by CAD/CAM, but both fabrication methods provided crowns with a clinically acceptable marginal fit.