RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection is characterised by a viral phase and a severe pro-inflammatory phase. The inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway limits the pro-inflammatory state in moderate to severe COVID-19. METHODOLOGY: We analysed the data obtained by an observational cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with ruxolitinib in 22 hospitals of Mexico. The applied dose was determined based on physician's criteria. The benefit of ruxolitinib was evaluated using the 8-points ordinal scale developed by the NIH in the ACTT1 trial. Duration of hospital stay, changes in pro-inflammatory laboratory values, mortality, and toxicity were also measured. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients were reported at 22 sites in Mexico from March to June 2020; 80.8% received ruxolitinib 5 mg BID and 19.16% received ruxolitinib 10 mg BID plus standard of care. At beginning of treatment, 223 patients were on oxygen support and 59 on invasive ventilation. The percentage of patients on invasive ventilation was 53% in the 10 mg and 13% in the 5 mg cohort. A statistically significant improvement measured as a reduction by 2 points on the 8-point ordinal scale was described (baseline 5.39 ± 0.93, final 3.67± 2.98, p = 0.0001). There were 74 deaths. Serious adverse events were presented in 6.9% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib appears to be safe in COVID-19 patients, with clinical benefits observed in terms of decrease in the 8-point ordinal scale and pro-inflammatory state. Further studies must be done to ensure efficacy against mortality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: Venetoclax combinations are a new standard for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these combinations in a period of accelerated approval in Latin-America.Methods: This observational study evaluated adults with acute myeloid leukemia who received venetoclax-based therapy in 11 public or private centers in Mexico and Peru for both newly diagnosed or relapsed and refractory AML.Results: Fifty patients were included; 28 with newly diagnosed (ND) AML and 22 with relapsed/refractory (RR) disease. ND patients were older (64 vs. 40 years; p < 0.001) with a lower functional capacity (ECOG ≥2 64.3% vs 9%; p < 0.001). Venetoclax was frequently combined with azacytidine (60%) and prophylactic azoles (82%) with a median maximum dose of 200 mg (range, 100-600 mg). Hematologic toxicities were common. Complete response rates including patients with incomplete hematopoietic recovery were 78.6% in ND and 45.5% in RR patients, with a median overall survival of 9.6 (95% CI 3.7-15.5) and 8 months (95% CI 4.8-11.2).Discussion: Our study showed a preferred use of venetoclax plus azacytidine over cyatrabine. Patients in the first-line setting were similar to those in the landmark studies, while most patients with relapsed disease had received prior intensive therapies. Responses were favorable, with a median survival in agreement to other reports, albeit shorter than that observed in the randomized phase-3 trials.Conclusion: Venetoclax-based therapy in AML was effective despite dose reductions and prophylactic antifungals in two middle-income countries outside of a clinical trial setting.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era, the blast phase of chronic myeloid leukaemia (BP-CML) renders an uncommon presentation and has a poor prognosis with an estimated overall survival below 20%. Mixed-phenotype blast phase is even more infrequent, presenting in 3.3% of these patients. Blast phase manifests along haematological sarcomas, with extramedullary activity in lymph nodes, skin and bone. We report the case of a patient with an ovarian sarcoma as an extramedullary presentation of mixed-phenotype BP-CML refractory to conventional treatment which responded to immunotherapy against CD33 and CD19.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Resumen En la actual pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) se ha observado que las principales complicaciones se presentan como resultado de la liberación de múltiples citocinas como interleucina (IL) 1, IL-6, factor de necrosis tumoral alfa e interferones de tipo 1 que generan un estado proinflamatorio caracterizado por lesión tisular pulmonar y subsecuentemente falla orgánica múltiple. En el campo de la hematología se cuenta con experiencia en el uso de diversos fármacos diseñados para limitar estas citocinas los cuales se han utilizado ya en pacientes con COVID-19 entre los que se encuentran los inhibidores de la IL-6 como el tocilizumab, el sarilumab y el siltuximab, el inhibidor de IL-1 anakinra y los inhibidores de la janus cinasa ruxolitinib y baricitinib. Al conocer la base fisiopatológica de la COVID-19, la utilidad de este tipo de fármacos muestra resultados alentadores para los cuadros moderados a graves de la enfermedad y extender su uso en ensayos clínicos mayores.

Abstract In the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it has been observed that the main complications arise as a result of the release of multiple cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and type 1 interferons that generate a proinflammatory state characterized by lung tissue injury and subsequently multiple organ failure. In the hematology field, there is experience in the use of various drugs designed to limit these cytokines which have already been used in patients with COVID-19 including IL-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab, sarilumab, and siltuximab; the IL-1 inhibitor anakinra; and the janus kinase inhibitors ruxolitinib and baricitinib. Knowing the pathophysiological basis of COVID-19, the usefulness of this type of drugs show encouraging results for moderate to severe symptoms of the disease and encourages its use in larger clinical trials.

RESUMEN

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common type of cancer in children worldwide, has one of the highest incidence rates in Mexico. It is a multifactorial disease and different cytokine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), have been associated with ALL expression. Few studies have been published analyzing IFNG +874 T/A and IL2 -330 G/T in this type of leukemia. These SNPs are involved in high or low expression, and are central to cellular immunity, influencing greatly tumor growth. The purpose of this work was to explore the association of IFNG +874 A/T (rs2430561) and IL2 -330 G/T (rs2069762) SNPs with ALL susceptibility and/or protection in 488 Mexican Mestizos patients, as compared to 950 Mexican Mestizo healthy controls. The results demonstrated that IFNG +874 T allele (pc = 0.00004, OR = 0.673) and the TT genotype (pc = 0.00015, OR = 0.349), protect against ALL expression with no specific gender association; however, the TT homozygote genotype (vs. TA+AA) seems more protective in males (pc = 0.00683). IL2 -330 G/T does not contribute to the development of ALL. In healthy Mexicans, the most common genotypes for IL2 and IFNG, are the low cytokine producers, suggesting that the genetic background in this ethnic group, may be partly responsible for the high incidence of ALL. These results show for the first time in Mexicans, the relevant role that IFNG SNP has in the genetic etiology of ALL. Thus, a large group of patients belonging to different ethnicities will be very helpful to study in order to demonstrate if these SNPs contribute to the genetic etiology of ALL, as shown here in Mexican Mestizos.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objetivo. Evaluar si el interferón-alfa humano recombinante (IFN), combinado con quimioterapia, suprime la clona portadora del cromosoma Filadelfia en pacientes con leucemia mieloide crónica (LMC). Material y métodos. Se estudiaron 53 pacientes con LMC en fase crónica de novo. Los pacientes recibieron uno de tres esquemas de tratamiento: a) inducción a la remisión con daunorrubicina, vincristina, arabinósido de citosina y prednisona (DOAP) y mantenimiento con IFN (n = 12); b) inducción con busulfán (BUS) o hidroxiurea (HIDX) siguiendo el mantenimiento con IFN (n = 26); c) inducción con DOAP y mantenimiento con BUS (n = 15). Resultados. La remisión hematológica se observó dos a seis meses después del inicio de tratamiento: 10 tuvieron remisión completa, seis parcial, 14 menor y 23 nula. Los 16 con respuesta completa o parcial recibieron IFN. Ninguno de los 15 casos mantenidos con BUS tuvo respuesta parcial o completa. La proporción de casos con respuesta citogenética completa (3/12) fue ligeramante menor en los tratados con quimioterapia intensiva (DOAP/IFN) que en aquéllos (7/26) de quimioterapia convencional (BUS/HIDX/IFN). Conclusiones. Nuestros resultados muestran que: a) el IFN en combinación con quimioterapia contribuyó a lograr respuesta citogenética parcial o completa en 30 por ciento de los casos; y b) la quimioterapia (DOAP) combinada con IFN no fue superior, en términos de respuesta citogenética, al tratamiento combinado de monodrogas (Bus/Hidx) con IFN

Asunto(s)