Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
2.
Resuscitation ; 96: 180-5, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26307453

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recommended for decades, the therapeutic value of adrenaline (epinephrine) in the resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is controversial. PURPOSE: To investigate the possible time-dependent outcomes associated with adrenaline administration by Emergency Medical Services personnel (EMS). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a near statewide cardiac resuscitation database between 1 January 2005 and 30 November 2013. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of the time interval between EMS dispatch and the initial dose of adrenaline on survival. The primary endpoints were survival to hospital discharge and favourable neurologic outcome. RESULTS: Data from 3469 patients with witnessed OHCA were analyzed. Their mean age was 66.3 years and 69% were male. An initially shockable rhythm was present in 41.8% of patients. Based on a multivariable logistic regression model with initial adrenaline administration time interval (AATI) from EMS dispatch as the covariate, survival was greatest when adrenaline was administered very early but decreased rapidly with increasing (AATI); odds ratio 0.94 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.92-0.97). The AATI had no significant effect on good neurological outcome (OR=0.96, 95% CI=0.90-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with OHCA, survival to hospital discharge was greater in those treated early with adrenaline by EMS especially in the subset of patients with a shockable rhythm. However survival rapidly decreased with increasing adrenaline administration time intervals (AATI).


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arizona/epidemiología , Niño , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Simpatomiméticos/administración & dosificación , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20948884

RESUMEN

Objective. To analyze the effect of basic resuscitation efforts on gasping and of gasping on survival. Methods. This is secondary analysis of a previously reported study comparing continuous chest compressions (CCC CPR) versus chest compressions plus ventilation (30:2 CPR) on survival. 64 swine were randomized to 1 of these 2 basic CPR approaches after either short (3 or 4 minutes) or long (5 or 6 minutes) durations of untreated VF. At 12 minutes of VF, all received the same Guidelines 2005 Advanced Cardiac Life Support. Neurologically status was evaluated at 24 hours. A score of 1 is normal, 2 is abnormal, such as not eating or drinking normally, unsteady gait, or slight resistance to restraint, 3 severely abnormal, where the animal is recumbent and unable to stand, 4 is comatose, and 5 is dead. For this analysis a neurological outcome score of 1 or 2 was classified as "good", and a score of 3, 4, or 5 was classified as "poor." Results. Gasping was more likely to continue or if absent, to resume in the animals with short durations of untreated VF before basic resuscitation efforts. With long durations of untreated VF, the frequency of gasping and survival was better in swine receiving CCC CPR. In the absence of frequent gasping, intact survival was rare in the long duration of untreated VF group. Conclusions. Gasping is an important phenomenon during basic resuscitation efforts for VF arrest and in this model was more frequent with CCC-CPR.

6.
Circulation ; 122(18 Suppl 3): S729-67, 2010 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20956224

RESUMEN

The goal of therapy for bradycardia or tachycardia is to rapidly identify and treat patients who are hemodynamically unstable or symptomatic due to the arrhythmia. Drugs or, when appropriate, pacing may be used to control unstable or symptomatic bradycardia. Cardioversion or drugs or both may be used to control unstable or symptomatic tachycardia. ACLS providers should closely monitor stable patients pending expert consultation and should be prepared to aggressively treat those with evidence of decompensation.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , American Heart Association , Cardiología/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/normas , Factores de Edad , Cardiología/normas , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Estados Unidos
7.
Circulation ; 122(18 Suppl 3): S720-8, 2010 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20956223

RESUMEN

A variety of CPR techniques and devices may improve hemodynamics or short-term survival when used by well-trained providers in selected patients. All of these techniques and devices have the potential to delay chest compressions and defibrillation. In order to prevent delays and maximize efficiency, initial training, ongoing monitoring, and retraining programs should be offered to providers on a frequent and ongoing basis. To date, no adjunct has consistently been shown to be superior to standard conventional (manual) CPR for out-of-hospital basic life support, and no device other than a defibrillator has consistently improved long-term survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.


Asunto(s)
American Heart Association , Cardiología/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Cardiología/instrumentación , Cardiología/normas , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Estados Unidos , Ventiladores Mecánicos/normas
8.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 10: 36, 2010 Aug 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20691123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Continued breathing following ventricular fibrillation has here-to-fore not been described. METHODS: We analyzed the spontaneous ventilatory activity during the first several minutes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in our isoflurane anesthesized swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The frequency and type of ventilatory activity was monitored by pneumotachometer and main stream infrared capnometer and analyzed in 61 swine during the first 3 to 6 minutes of untreated VF. RESULTS: During the first minute of VF, the air flow pattern in all 61 swine was similar to those recorded during regular spontaneous breathing during anesthesia and was clearly different from the patterns of gasping. The average rate of continued breathing during the first minute of untreated VF was 10 breaths per minute. During the second minute of untreated VF, spontaneous breathing activity either stopped or became typical of gasping. During minutes 2 to 5 of untreated VF, most animals exhibited very slow spontaneous ventilatory activity with a pattern typical of gasping; and the pattern of gasping was crescendo-decrescendo, as has been previously reported. In the absence of therapy, all ventilatory activity stopped 6 minutes after VF cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: In our swine model of VF cardiac arrest, we documented that normal breathing continued for the first minute following cardiac arrest.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Ventricular/fisiopatología , Animales , Apnea , Pruebas Respiratorias , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Capacidad Inspiratoria , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico , Respiración , Porcinos , Factores de Tiempo , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico
9.
Resuscitation ; 81(5): 585-90, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20172642

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare 24-h survival rates and neurological function of swine in cardiac arrest treated with one of three forms of simulated basic life support CPR. METHODS: Thirty swine were randomized equally among three experimental groups to receive either 30:2 CPR with an unobstructed endotracheal tube (ET) or continuous chest compression (CCC) CPR with an unobstructed ET or CCC CPR with a collapsable rubber sleeve on the ET allowing air outflow but completely restricting air inflow. The swine were anesthetized but not paralyzed. Two min of untreated VF was followed by 9 min of simulated single rescuer bystander CPR. In the 30:2 CPR group, each set of 30 chest compressions was followed by a 15-s pause to simulate the realistic duration of interrupted chest compressions required for a single rescuer to deliver 2 mouth-to-mouth ventilations. The other two groups were provided continuous chest compressions (CCC) without assisted ventilations. At 11 min post-arrest a biphasic defibrillation shock (150 J) was administered followed by a period of advanced cardiac life support. RESULTS: In the 30:2 group, 8 of 10 animals had good neurological function at 24-h post-resuscitation. In the CCC open airway group, 10 of 10, and in the CCC inspiratory obstructed group, 9 of 10. The number of shocks (P<0.05) and epinephrine doses (P<0.05) required for ROSC was greater in the 30:2 CPR group than in the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in 24-h survival with good neurological function among these three different CPR protocols.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Intubación Intratraqueal , Respiración Artificial , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/complicaciones , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/métodos , Masculino , Neurología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Porcinos , Simpatomiméticos/uso terapéutico
10.
Circulation ; 116(22): 2525-30, 2007 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17998457

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 2005 Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care changed the previous ventilations-to-chest-compression algorithm for bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from 2 ventilations before each 15 chest compressions (2:15 CPR) to 30 chest compressions before 2 ventilations (30:2 CPR). It was acknowledged in the guidelines that the change was based on a consensus rather than clear evidence. This study was designed to compare 24-hour neurologically normal survival between the initial applications of continuous chest compressions without assisted ventilations with 30:2 CPR in a swine model of witnessed out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-four animals underwent 12 minutes of ventricular fibrillation before defibrillation attempts. They were divided into 4 groups, each with increasing durations (3, 4, 5, and 6 minutes, respectively) of untreated ventricular fibrillation before the initiation of bystander resuscitation consisting of either continuous chest compression or 30:2 CPR. After the various untreated ventricular durations plus bystander resuscitation durations, all animals were given the first defibrillation attempt 12 minutes after the induction of ventricular fibrillation, followed by the 2005 guideline-recommended advanced cardiac life support. Neurologically normal survival at 24 hours after resuscitation was observed in 23 of 33 (70%) of the animals in the continuous chest compression groups but in only 13 of 31 (42%) of the 30:2 CPR groups (P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In a realistic model of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest, initial bystander administration of continuous chest compressions without assisted ventilations resulted in significantly better 24-hour postresuscitation neurologically normal survival than did the initial bystander administration of 2005 guideline-recommended 30:2 CPR.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Masaje Cardíaco/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Animales , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Paro Cardíaco/complicaciones , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Masaje Cardíaco/normas , Modelos Animales , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Porcinos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fibrilación Ventricular/complicaciones , Fibrilación Ventricular/mortalidad , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
11.
Resuscitation ; 74(2): 357-65, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17379381

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The deleterious effects of positive pressure ventilation may be prevented by substituting passive oxygen insufflation during advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: We compared 24-h neurologically normal survival among three different ventilation scenarios for ACLS in a realistic swine model of out-of-hospital prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest. No bystander CPR was provided during the first 8 min of untreated VF before the simulated arrival of an emergency medical system (EMS). Thirty-six swine were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups. Group I (standard ventilation) was mechanically ventilated at 10 respirations per minute (RPM) at a tidal volume (TV) of 10 ml/kg with 100% oxygen. Group II (hyperventilation) was ventilated at 35 RPM at a TV of 20 ml/kg with 100% oxygen. In Group III (insufflation) animals, a nasal cannula was placed in the oropharynx to administer oxygen continuously at 10 l/min. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the 24h neurologically normal survival among groups (standard: 2/12, hyperventilation: 2/12, insufflation: 4/12; p=.53). CONCLUSIONS: Passive insufflation may be an acceptable alternative to the currently recommended positive pressure ventilation during resuscitation efforts for out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest. Potential advantages of this technique include: (1) easier to teach, (2) easier to administer, (3) prevention of the adverse effects of positive pressure ventilation and (4) allows EMS personnel to concentrate upon other critically important duties.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Animales , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Curva ROC , Distribución Aleatoria , Tasa de Supervivencia , Porcinos , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Fibrilación Ventricular/fisiopatología
12.
Am J Med ; 119(1): 6-9, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16431175

RESUMEN

Survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest continue to be low despite periodic updates in the Guidelines for Emergency Medical Services and periodic improvements such as the addition of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs). The low incidence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), substantial time without chest compressions throughout the resuscitation effort, and a lack of response to initial defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation contribute to these unacceptably poor results. Resuscitation guidelines are only revised every 5 to 7 years and can be difficult to change because of the lack of randomized controlled trials in humans. Such trials are rare because of a number of logistical difficulties, including the problem of obtaining informed consent. An alternative approach to advancing resuscitation science is for evidence-based demonstration projects in areas that have adequate records, so that one may determine whether the new approach improves survival. This is reasonable because the current guidelines make provisions for deviations under certain local circumstances or as directed by the emergency medical services medical director. A wealth of experimental evidence indicates that interruption of chest compressions for any reason in patients with cardiac arrest is deleterious. Accordingly, a new approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest called cardiocerebral resuscitation (CCR) was developed that places more emphasis on chest compressions for witnessed cardiac arrest in adults and de-emphasizes ventilation. There is also emphasis on chest compressions before defibrillation in circulatory phase of cardiac arrest. CCR was initiated in Tucson, Arizona, in November 2003, and in two rural Wisconsin counties in early 2004.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Masaje Cardíaco/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Auxiliares de Urgencia , Humanos , Respiración , Fibrilación Ventricular/complicaciones , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
13.
Circulation ; 112(9): 1259-65, 2005 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16116053

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Survival after nontraumatic out-of-hospital (OOH) cardiac arrest in Tucson, Arizona, has been flat at 6% (121/2177) for the decade 1992 to 2001. We hypothesized that interruptions of chest compressions occur commonly and for substantial periods during treatment of OOH cardiac arrest and could be contributing to the lack of improvement in resuscitation outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-one adult OOH cardiac arrest patients treated by automated external defibrillator (AED)-equipped Tucson Fire Department first responders from November 2001 through November 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Reviews were performed according to the code arrest record and verified with the AED printout. Validation of the methodology for determining the performance of chest compressions was done post hoc. The median time from "9-1-1" call receipt to arrival at the patient's side was 6 minutes, 27 seconds (interquartile range [IQR, 25% to 75%], 5 minutes, 24 seconds, to 7 minutes, 34 seconds). An additional 54 seconds (IQR, 38 to 74 seconds) was noted between arrival and the first defibrillation attempt. Initial defibrillation shocks never restored a perfusing rhythm (0/21). Chest compressions were performed only 43% of the time during the resuscitation effort. Although attempting to follow the 2000 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, chest compressions were delayed or interrupted repeatedly throughout the resuscitation effort. Survival to hospital discharge was 7%, not different from that of our historical control (4/61 versus 121/2177; P=0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent interruption of chest compressions results in no circulatory support during more than half of resuscitation efforts. Such interruptions could be a major contributing factor to the continued poor outcome seen with OOH cardiac arrest.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Desfibriladores , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
14.
Resuscitation ; 64(3): 261-8, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15733752

RESUMEN

Stagnant survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remain a great impetus for advancing resuscitation science. International resuscitation guidelines, with all their advantages for standardizing resuscitation therapeutic protocols, can be difficult to change. A formalized evidence-based process has been adopted by the International Liason Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in formulating such guidelines. Currently, randomized clinical trials are considered optimal evidence, and very few major changes in the Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care are made without such. An alternative approach is to allow externally controlled clinical trials more weight in Guideline formulation and resuscitation protocol adoption. In Tucson, Arizona (USA), the Fire Department cardiac arrest database has revealed a number of resuscitation issues. These include a poor bystander CPR rate, a lack of response to initial defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation, and substantial time without chest compressions during the resuscitation effort. A local change in our previous resuscitation protocols had been instituted based upon this historical database information.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
15.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 9(3): 211-7, 2003 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12771672

RESUMEN

Advancements in electronic data acquisition have translated into improved monitoring of victims of cardiac arrest, but initial techniques remain direct observation of pulses and respirations. The most essential monitor continues to be the electrocardiogram. However, monitoring diastolic blood pressure, myocardial perfusion pressure, and end-tidal carbon dioxide are extremely useful. Most of the current research on monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation focuses on methods for analyzing ventricular fibrillation waveforms. By analyzing the waveform, defibrillation shocks may be delivered at the time when the chance of success is optimal. Low-amplitude and low-frequency fibrillation waveforms are associated with increased rates of asystole and pulseless electrical activity after defibrillation. Methods of analyzing the ventricular fibrillation waveform include measuring the amplitude and frequency and combining the contributions of amplitude and frequency by various methods to improve discrimination. Other types of monitoring being studied for their usefulness during cardiac arrests include sonography, Bispectral Index monitoring, tissue carbon dioxide monitors, and pupil observation. The test of these monitoring techniques is ultimately their ability to improve patient survival to hospital discharge, which is a major challenge for resuscitation researchers.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Animales , Dióxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Circulación Coronaria/fisiología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/metabolismo , Paro Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Pupila/fisiología , Porcinos , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA