RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We investigated donors with brain death on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, a clinically challenging situation due to hemodynamic instability frequently encountered in these donors, which may threaten organ function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We described our experience with 15 utilized brain death donors on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, consecutively admit-ted in our intensive care unit (which is a referral center for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) from 2018 to 2023. We investigated whether utilization rate for brain death donors on extracor-poreal membrane oxygenation was affected by the introduction of a monitoring hemodynamic schedule during the 6-hour observation period. RESULTS: The utilization rate was 78% in period 1 and 88% in period 2. No statistically significant differences were observed for age, sex, and the incidence of cardiovascular risk factors between period 1 and period 2. The cause of death was postanoxic encephalopathy in all but 1 donor, who was on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory respiratory failure and developed cerebral hemorrhage. Number of organs per donor was 2 in all the population with no significant differences between period 1 and period 2. In the overall population, 15 livers were transplanted, 11 kidneys, 1 heart, and 1 pancreas. In our population, left ventricular ejection fraction severe dysfunction was observed in all donors except in the donor on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; the organ from this donor was deemed unsuitable for transplant. No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic data between the 2 subgroups. All donors were on 2 vasoactive drugs (norepinephrine and vasopressin) to maintain adequate perfusion (mean arterial pressure >60 mm Hg). Three donors were oligoanuric (due to postarrest acute renal failure). CONCLUISONS: In our series of 15 consecutive brain death donors on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a strict monitoring regimen during the 6-hour obser-vation period was associated with a higher utilization rate.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Encefálica , Selección de Donante , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemodinámica , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Causas de Muerte , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Management of potential organ donors is crucial in the donation process, considering that hemodynamic instability is quite common. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the this single-center retrospective observational study, we analyzed 87 utilized brain death donors consecutively admitted to our intensive care unit from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022. We assessed the achievement of donor management goals during the observation period, and we also evaluated whether the achieve-ment of donor goals differed between younger and older donors (arbitrary age cutoff of 65 years). RESULTS: In our series, mean age of donors was 67 ± 18 y, and organ-per-donor ratio was 2.3. The number of donor goals significantly increased during the 6-hour observation period (P < .001) and all donor goals were achieved in most donors (84/87) at the end of the observation period with no changes in the use and dose of vasoactive drugs. With respect to age, the number of donor goals was significantly higher in older donors at first evaluation, but goals significantly increased in both age subgroups of donors at the end of the 6-hour observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Our data strongly suggested that a strict hemodynamic monitoring schedule allows the achievement of donor goals both in older and in younger brain death donors. We confirmed our previous findings that hemodynamic management in brain death donors is influenced by age. A strict hemodynamic monitoring schedule of brain death donors is useful to consistently achieve donor goals.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Encefálica , Hemodinámica , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Anciano , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Edad , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Selección de Donante , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In brain death donors (BDDs), donor management is the key in the complex donation process. Donor management goals, which are standards of care or clinical parameters, have been considered an acceptable barometer of successful donor management. AIM: To test the hypothesis that aetiology of brain death could influence haemody namic management in BDDs. METHODS: Haemodynamic data (blood pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, lactate, urine output, and vasoactive drugs) of BDDs were recorded on intensive care unit (ICU) admission and during the 6-h observation period (Time 1 at the beginning; Time 2 at the end). RESULTS: The study population was divided into three groups according to the aetiology of brain death: Stroke (n = 71), traumatic brain injury (n = 48), and postanoxic encephalopathy (n = 19). On ICU admission, BDDs with postanoxic encephalopathy showed the lowest values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure associated with higher values of heart rate and lactate and a higher need of norepinephrine and other vasoactive drugs. At the beginning of the 6-h period (Time 1), BDDs with postanoxic encephalopathy showed higher values of heart rate, lactate, and central venous pressure together with a higher need of other vasoactive drugs. CONCLUSION: According to our data, haemodynamic management of BDDs is affected by the aetiology of brain death. BDDs with postanoxic encephalopathy have higher requirements for norepinephrine and other vasoactive drugs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this 2-arm, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was to assess the effects of a preoperative single dose steroid on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain, and vocal function after thyroidectomy for benign disease. METHODS: We randomized 102 patients into 2 groups from January to December 2009: (1) treatment with 8 mg/2 mL of dexamethasone and (2) treatment with 2 mL NaCl 0.9%, both administered intravenously before anesthesia. RESULTS: The severity of nausea and the need for antiemetic drugs were reduced in patients receiving dexamethasone (p = .0001). Dexamethasone patients reported significantly less pain (p = .008); the need for analgesic drugs was lower in the dexamethasone group (p = .048). No differences were noted with regard to subjective voice analysis (p = .693). CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone (8 mg IV) is a safe and effective method to reduce PONV and pain after thyroid resection and should be used routinely.
Asunto(s)
Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & control , Tiroidectomía/métodos , Trastornos de la Voz/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/epidemiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/patología , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/cirugía , Tiroidectomía/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trastornos de la Voz/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are significantly altered in critically ill septic patients and the risk of prolonged periods with concentrations below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and of low area under the serum concentration-time curve/MIC (AUC/MIC) ratios is of concern. We compared the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile of linezolid administered by intermittent or continuous infusion in critically ill septic patients. Patients were divided into two groups: intermittent infusion (Group I) (600mg/12h); or continuous infusion (Group C) (300mg intravenous loading dose +900mg continuous infusion on Day 1, followed by 1200mg/daily from Day 2). Linezolid serum levels were monitored for 72h and microbiological data were collected. The clinical outcome was monitored. Sixteen patients completed the study. MICs of susceptible pathogens were 2mg/L for 80% of the isolates. In Group I, linezolid trough serum levels (C(min)) varied widely and were below the susceptibility breakpoint (4mg/L) during the study period; in 50% of patients C(min) was <1mg/L. In Group C, mean linezolid serum levels were more stable and, starting from 6h, were significantly higher than C(min) levels observed in Group I and were always above the susceptibility breakpoint. Time that the free drug concentration was above the MIC (T(free)>MIC) of>85% was more frequent in Group C than in Group I (P<0.05). Finally, with continuous infusion it was possible to achieve AUC/MIC values of 80-120 more frequently than with intermittent infusion (P<0.05). According to PK/PD parameters, continuous infusion has theoretical advantages over intermittent infusion in this population of patients.