RESUMEN
Introducción: La acidosis tubular renal (ATR) incluye una clínica diversa que depende del sitio anatómico en el que se encuentre la alteración tubular, diferenciándose cuatro tipos de ATR. La acidosis tubular renal distal (ATRd) o Tipo I es una condición clínica poco frecuente (1:100.000 niños) que es debida a causas primarias o genéticas; en los niños con frecuencia se han encontrado alterados los genes ATP6V0A4 y ATP6V1B1 en forma homocigota, lo que causa una disfunción de la bomba ATPasa de H+ de las membranas apicales en el túbulo distal generando una inadecuada secreción de hidrogeniones traduciéndose en acidosis metabólica hiperclorémica persistente, con trastornos hidroelectrolíticos que pueden generar alteraciones en el metabolismo óseo, alteraciones renales, gastrointestinales y falla para crecer. Conclusión: El diagnóstico oportuno, seguimiento y tratamiento adecuados pueden evitar las complicaciones y permitir un adecuado crecimiento durante la infancia. (provisto por Infomedic International)
Introduction: Renal tubular acidosis (RTA) includes a diverse clinic that depends on the anatomical site where the tubular alteration is located, with four types of RTA being differentiated. Distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) or Type I is a rare clinical condition (1:100,000 children) that is due to the presence of a tubular disorder. It is due to primary or genetic causes; In children, the ATP6V0A4 and ATP6V1B1 genes have frequently been found to be homozygously altered, which causes dysfunction of the H+ ATPase pump of the apical membranes in the distal tubule generating an inadequate secretion of hydrogenions resulting in persistent hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, with hydroelectrolytic disorders that can generate alterations in bone metabolism, renal and gastrointestinal alterations, and failure to grow. Conclusion: Timely diagnosis, adequate follow-up and treatment can avoid complications and allow adequate growth during childhood. (provided by Infomedic International)
RESUMEN
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains one of the most prevalent pathologies in the world and is among the leading causes of mortality and morbidity, partially due to underdiagnosis. The use of clinical questionnaires to identify high-risk individuals to take them to further diagnostic procedures has emerged as a strategy to address this problem. Objective: To compare the performance of the COULD IT BE COPD, CDQ, COPD-PS, LFQ, and PUMA questionnaires for COPD diagnosis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on subjects who underwent spirometry in the third-level center. Data were collected between January 2015 and March 2020. Bivariate analysis was performed between the study variables and the presence of COPD. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) for each questionnaire were calculated. The AUC-ROCs were compared with the DeLong test, considering a p value <0.05 statistically significant. Results: 681 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were taken to the final analysis. The prevalence of COPD was 27.5% (187/681). The mean age of the subjects was 65.9 years (SD ± 11.79); 46.3% (315/681) were female, and 83.6% (569/681) reported respiratory symptoms. Statistically significant relationship was found for COPD diagnosis with male sex, older age, respiratory symptoms, and exposure to wood smoke (p value <0.05). The AUC-ROCs of the questionnaires were between 0.581 and 0.681. The COULD IT BE COPD questionnaire had a lower discriminatory capacity AUC-ROC of 0.581, concerning the other scores (DeLong test, p = 0.0002). Conclusion: The CDQ, COPD-PS, LFQ, PUMA, and COULD IT BE COPD questionnaires have acceptable performance for the diagnosis of COPD together with low sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, its use must be complemented with other diagnostic tests or techniques such as pulmonary function tests.