RESUMEN

The Quality Indicators for Physiotherapy Management of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis (QUIPA) is the only patient-reported outcome measure to assess the quality indicators of physiotherapy management of hip/knee osteoarthritis (OA). It consists of 3 subscales and a total of 18 questions. The purpose of this research was to translate and adapt the QUIPA into the Turkish language using a cross-cultural approach as well as test its validity and reliability for Turkish-speaking patients with hip/knee OA. Ninety-two patients with hip/knee OA were enrolled in the research. The cross-cultural adaptation of the QUIPA was performed according to guidelines defined by Beaton et al. Participants completed the QUIPA tool twice at an interval of 7 days. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were determined by interpreting the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha coefficient, respectively. Construct validity was tested via exploratory factor analysis. For the first, second, and third subscales and total score of QUIPA, ICC was found to be 0.895, 0.947, 0.665, and 0.925, respectively. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.682, 0.797, 0.593, and 0.812. The Exploratory Factor Analysis demonstrated that the QUIPA tool is based on 3 factors. These results indicate that the Turkish version of the QUIPA has excellent test-retest reliability and good internal consistency. Therefore, the Turkish version of the QUIPA seems to be a valid and reliable tool to assess the quality indicators of physiotherapy management of hip/knee OA in Turkish-speaking patients. It is intended to be used in clinical settings and research works.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Splinting how the hand can be used in daily life. Therefore, earlier splint removal is thought to improve functional recovery. The aim of our study was to assess the outcomes of patients who removed their splint and started using their hand earlier and compare them to patients who received routine care. Patients with tendon repairs were divided into two groups: Group 1 (Early) started daily use of their hand at the 5th postoperative week and Group 2 (Later) at the 6th week. Patients received regular therapy consisting of an early motion protocol. Assessments were performed at three consecutive time points. Grip and pinch strength was measured and Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) was performed. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) were filled out. Both within-group and between-group analyses were performed. A total of 58 patients with flexor or extensor tendon repairs were analyzed. All parameters improved significantly over time within both groups (P<0.05). When the time effect was ignored, kinesiophobia, disability and functional results - except grip strength - were statistically better in Group 2 group than in Group 1 (P<0.05). Our results showed that, despite the clinically observed recovery, earlier splint removal and start of daily hand use did not truly improve the functional results. To us, this means that the remarkable advances in surgical techniques do not accelerate the physiological healing process. Therefore, clinical recommendations should always be supported with evidence-based data.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Rheumatic diseases cause deformities in the hands and affect daily living activities. Therefore, assessment of hand disabilities is important in rheumatic disease. The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the A Score For Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatic Affections of the Hands (SACRAH). A translation and back-translation of the SACRAH were performed, according to the Beaton guidelines. Patients who were between 18-65 years old, who were literate in Turkish, who had rheumatic disease diagnosis and whose hands were affected, were included in the study. Patients who were using a splint during daytime were excluded from the study. They completed the Turkish version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH-T) once and the final version of the SACRAH Questionnaire twice with a 7 days' interval. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and reliability (test-retest reliability) of the questionnaire were assessed. Besides, correlations between SACRAH and DASH-T scores were analyzed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. One hundred and twenty patients participated in the study. The Turkish version of the SACRAH met set criteria of reliability and validity. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's α=0.88) and test-retest reliability were very good (r=0.73). SACRAH showed a positive and statistically significant correlation with DASH-T scores (r=0.83, p<0.001). Our results show that the Turkish version of the SACRAH has excellent test-retest reliability and validity. As a result of this study we determined that SACRAH is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing functional status and subjective manual function in Turkish-speaking patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

After tendon injuries, it has been observed clinically that patient-reported disability is more severe than the patient's actual performance. This is thought to result from a fear of movement (kinesiophobia) after surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of kinesiophobia in this patient population and its effects on the clinical outcomes. Patients (n=118) with tendon repairs were included. All the participants received early passive mobilization and were assessed at the end of the 8th week. Grip and pinch strengths were measured and the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) was conducted. Patients also filled out the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Patients were divided according to their kinesiophobia: Group 1 with low kinesiophobia (TSK<37) and Group 2 with high kinesiophobia (TSK≥37). The groups were compared on the assessed parameters. Fifty-nine percent of the patients had a high kinesiophobia level. The performance-based test results were similar between the groups (P>0.05). Patient-reported MHOQ and TSK scores were significantly lower in the high kinesiophobic group (P=0.001 and P=0.000, respectively). Patients with tendon repairs often develop kinesiophobia, which may contribute to difficulty when starting to re-use their hand in daily life. None of the objective results were affected by this fear of movement-only patient-reported disability. Clinicians should be aware that clinical outcomes may be affected by the patient's kinesiophobic thinking and must be cautious during treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often results in impairments in upper extremities, especially in the small joints of hand. Involvement of hand brings limitations in activities of daily living. However, it is commonly observed that patient-reported functional status of hand does not always corresponds to their actual physical performance in the clinical setting. The aim of this pilot study is to investigate the relationship between patient self-reported and objectively measured hand functions in patients with RA. Twenty-six patients (51±13 years) with RA diagnosis participated in the study. Hand grip and pinch (lateral, bipod, tripod) strengths were measured and Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT) was performed for objective functional performance. Duruöz Hand Index and Beck Depression Inventory - Turkish version were completed by patients. Grip and all three-pinch strength results significantly correlated with Duruöz Hand Index scores (p<0.05). JHFT results except the sentence writing also correlated with the Duruöz scores (p<0.05). Our results showed that self-reported outcome scales might be used for determining functional level of hand in patients with RA in rheumatology practice. Objective quantitative functional tests are the best methods in evaluating functional level of hand, but require valid and reliable equipment with accurate calibration. Therefore, in case of unavailability of objective assessment tools, patient-reported scales may also reflect the real status of hand functions.

Asunto(s)