RESUMEN
Objectives:To evaluate human-like intravenous doses of fosfomycin (8g/Q8h) and amikacin (15mg/kg/Q24h) efficacy in monotherapy and in combination against six fosfomycin-heteroresistant Escherichia coli isolates using a hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM).Materials and methods:Six fosfomycin-heteroresistant E. coli isolates (4 with strong mutator phenotype) and the control strain E. coli ATCC 25922 were used. Mutant frequencies for rifampin (100mg/L), fosfomycin (50 and 200mg/L) and amikacin (32mg/L) were determined. Fosfomycin and amikacin MICs were assessed by agar dilution (AD), gradient strip (GSA) and broth microdilution (BMD) assays. Fosfomycin and amikacin synergies were studied by checkerboard and time-kill assays at different concentrations. Fosfomycin (8g/Q8h) and amikacin (15mg/kg/Q24h) efficacy alone and in combination were assessed using a HFIM.Results:Five isolates were resistant to fosfomycin by AD and BMD, but all susceptible by GSA. All isolates were considered susceptible to amikacin. Antibiotic combinations were synergistic in two isolates and no antagonism was detected. In time-kill assays, all isolates survived under fosfomycin at 64mg/L, although, at 307mg/L, only the normomutators and two hypermutators survived. Four isolates survived under 16mg/L amikacin and none at 45mg/L. No growth was detected under combination conditions. In HFIM, fosfomycin and amikacin monotherapies failed to sterilise bacterial cultures, however, fosfomycin and amikacin combination showed a rapid eradication.Conclusions.There may be a risk of treatment failure of fosfomycin-heteroresistant E. coli isolates using either amikacin or fosfomycin in monotherapy. These results support that the combination amikacin-fosfomycin can rapidly decrease bacterial burden and prevent the emergence of resistant subpopulations against fosfomycin-heteroresistant strains.
RESUMEN
The objectives of this study were to characterize the role of the uhpT, glpT, and fosA genes in fosfomycin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae and evaluate the use of sodium phosphonoformate (PPF) in combination with fosfomycin. Seven clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae and the reference strain (ATCC 700721) were used, and their genomes were sequenced. ΔuhpT, ΔglpT, and ΔfosA mutants were constructed from two isolates and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700721. Fosfomycin susceptibility testing was done by the gradient strip method. Synergy between fosfomycin and PPF was studied by checkerboard assay and analyzed using SynergyFinder. Spontaneous fosfomycin mutant frequencies at 64 and 512 mg/liter, in vitro activity using growth curves with fosfomycin gradient concentrations (0 to 256mg/liter), and time-kill assays at 64 and 307 mg/liter were evaluated with and without PPF (0.623 mM). The MICs of fosfomycin against the clinical isolates ranged from 16 to ≥1,024 mg/liter. The addition of 0.623 mM PPF reduced fosfomycin MIC between 2- and 8-fold. Deletion of fosA led to a 32-fold decrease. Synergistic activities were observed with the combination of fosfomycin and PPF (most synergistic area at 0.623 mM). The lowest fosfomycin-resistant mutant frequencies were found in ΔfosA mutants, with decreases in frequency from 1.69 × 10-1 to 1.60 × 10-5 for 64 mg/liter of fosfomycin. In the final growth monitoring and time-kill assays, fosfomycin showed a bactericidal effect only with the deletion of fosA and not with the addition of PPF. We conclude that fosA gene inactivation leads to a decrease in fosfomycin resistance in K. pneumoniae The pharmacological approach using PPF did not achieve enough activity, and the effect decreased with the presence of fosfomycin-resistant mutations.
Asunto(s)
Fosfomicina , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Foscarnet , Fosfomicina/farmacología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , beta-LactamasasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tolerance (including persistence) and resistance result in increased survival under antibiotic pressure. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the interplay between resistance and tolerance to ciprofloxacin under therapeutic and killing conditions to determine the contribution of low-level quinolone resistance (LLQR) mechanisms to tolerance. We also determined how the interaction between resistance (LLQR phenotypes) and tolerance was modified under SOS response suppression. METHODS: Twelve isogenic Escherichia coli strains harbouring quinolone resistance mechanisms combined with SOS response deficiency and six clinical E. coli isolates (LLQR or non-LLQR) were evaluated. Survival (tolerance or persistence) assays were used to measure surviving bacteria after a short period (up to 4 h) of bactericidal antibiotic treatment under therapeutic and killing concentrations of ciprofloxacin [1 mg/L, EUCAST/CLSI breakpoint for resistance; and 2.5 mg/L, peak serum concentration (Cmax) of this drug]. RESULTS: QRDR substitutions (S83L in GyrA alone or combined with S80R in ParC) significantly increased the fraction of tolerant bacteria (2-4 log10 cfu/mL) after exposure to ciprofloxacin at clinically relevant concentrations. The impact on tolerant bacteria due to SOS response suppression (including persistence mediated by the tisB gene) was reversed by LLQR mechanisms at therapeutic concentrations. Furthermore, no reduction in the fraction of tolerant bacteria due to SOS response suppression was observed when S83L in GyrA plus S80R in ParC were combined. CONCLUSIONS: Tolerance and quinolone resistance mutations interact synergistically, giving LLQR mechanisms an additional role in allowing bacterial survival and evasion of therapeutic antimicrobial conditions by a combination of the two strategies. At clinically relevant concentrations, LLQR mechanisms reverse further impact of SOS response suppression in reducing bacterial tolerance.