RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Salt sensitivity is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk, but the gold standard method (diet cycles) requires 24-h urine samples and has poor patient compliance. OBJECTIVES: Test the hypothesis that oral fludrocortisone (0.4 mg per day for 7 days) is a good alternative in identifying salt-sensitive patients. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a randomized crossover study with 30 hypertensive individuals comprising the following steps: (1) washout; (2) phase A (low- and high-sodium diet cycles); (3) washout 2; (4) phase B (fludrocortisone test). Phase A and B steps were performed in a random way. Consistent with the literature, we found that 53.3% were salt-sensitive according to the reference test. Using the ROC curve, the fludrocortisone test defined salt sensitivity by a median blood pressure increase of ≥3 mmHg. A good accuracy of fludrocortisone in detecting salt sensitivity was observed (AUC: 0.732±0.065; p<0.001), with 80% sensitivity and 53% specificity. CONCLUSION: The fludrocortisone test is a good option for screening salt sensitivity in hypertensive patients. However, the low specificity prevents this test from being an ideal substitute to the labor-intensive diet cycles exam in the definition of salt sensitivity. This clinical trial is registered with NCT01453959.

RESUMEN

To evaluate whether captopril (3×50 mg/day) potentiates post-resistance exercise hypotension (PREH) in hypertensives (HT), 12 HT men received captopril and placebo for 4 weeks each in a double-blinded, randomized-crossover design. On each therapy, subjects underwent 2 sessions: Control (C - rest) and Resistance Exercise (RE - 7 exercises, 3 sets to moderate fatigue, 50% of 1 RM -repetition maximum). Measurements were taken before and after 30-60 min (Post1) and 7 h (Post2), and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) was monitored for 24 h. There were no differences in PREH characteristics and mechanisms between the placebo and captopril periods. At Post1, systolic/diastolic BP decreased significantly and similarly after RE with both therapies (Placebo=-13±2/-9±1 mmHg vs. Captopril=-12±2/-10±1 mmHg, P<0.05). RE reduced cardiac output in some subjects and systemic vascular resistance in others. Heart rate and cardiac sympathetic modulation increased, while stroke volume and baroreflex sensitivity decreased after RE (Placebo: +13±2 bpm, +21±5 nu, -11±5 ml, -4±2 ms/mmHg; Captopril: +13±2 bpm, +35±4 nu, 17±5 ml, -3±1 ms/mmHg, P<0.05). At Post2, all variables returned to pre-intervention values. Ambulatory BP was similar between the sessions. Thus, captopril did not potentiate the magnitude and duration of PREH in HT men, and it did not influence PREH mechanisms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUÇÃO: O exercício aeróbio é recomendado para o tratamento da hipertensão. Sua intensidade pode ser prescrita com base na porcentagem da frequência cardíaca máxima (%FCmáx) ou no consumo pico de oxigênio (%VO2pico) em que os limiares ventilatórios (LV) são alcançados. Entretanto, alguns hipertensos que iniciam o treinamento podem estar tomando betabloqueadores, o que pode influenciar esses parâmetros. OBJETIVO: verificar os efeitos do atenolol sobre os LV de hipertensos sedentários. MÉTODOS: Nove voluntários realizaram dois testes ergoespirométricos máximos após quatro semanas de tratamento com atenolol (25 mg administrado por via oral duas vezes por dia) e com placebo, administrados em ordem fixa e de forma cega. Durante os testes, a frequência cardíaca (FC), a pressão arterial (PA) e o VO2 no repouso, limiar anaeróbio (LA), ponto de compensação respiratória (PCR) e pico do esforço foram analisados. RESULTADOS: O VO2 aumentou progressivamente no exercício e seus valores foram semelhantes nos dois tratamentos. A PA sistólica e a FC também aumentaram no exercício, mas seus valores absolutos foram significativamente menores com o atenolol. Porém, o aumento da PA sistólica e da FC no exercício foi semelhante com os dois tratamentos. Assim, o percentual da FCmáx e o percentual do VO2pico em que LA e PCR foram alcançados não diferiram entre o placebo e o atenolol. CONCLUSÃO: O atenolol na dosagem de 50 mg/dia não afetou o percentual do VO2pico e da FCmáx em que os LV são atingidos, o que confirma que a prescrição de intensidade de treinamento com base nessas porcentagens pode ser mantida em hipertensos que recebem betabloqueadores.

INTRODUCTION: Aerobic exercise is recommended for the treatment of hypertension. Its intensity can be prescribed based on the percentage of maximum heart rate (% MHR) or peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak%) in which the ventilatory thresholds (VT) are achieved. However, some hypertensive patients who begin aerobic training may be receiving beta-blockers, which can influence these parameters. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of atenolol on VT of sedentary hypertensive patients. METHODS: Nine volunteers performed two cardiopulmonary exercise tests until exhaustion after 4 weeks of treatment with atenolol (25 mg orally twice daily) and with placebo, administered in a fixed order and in a blinded manner. During the tests, heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), VO2 at rest, anaerobic threshold (AT), respiratory compensation point (RCP) and peak effort were analyzed. RESULTS: VO2 increased progressively throughout the exercise and the values were similar for both treatments. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate also increased progressively during the exercise, but their absolute values were significantly lower with atenolol. However, the increase in systolic BP and HR during exercise was similar in both treatments. Thus, the % of MHR and %VO2peak at which LA and PCR were achieved were not different between placebo and atenolol. CONCLUSION: Atenolol, at a dosage of 50mg/day, did not affect the % of VO2peak and % of MHR corresponding to the VTs, which confirms that prescription of training intensity based on these percentages is adequate to hypertensive patients receiving beta-blockers.

RESUMEN

FUNDAMENTO: A felipressina foi adicionada ao anestésico local para aumentar a duração do efeito anestésico e reduzir a toxicidade nos procedimentos dentários. No entanto, o efeito sobre a pressão arterial é incerta, e isso pode ser altamente relevante no tratamento dentário de pacientes hipertensos. OBJETIVO: Investigar o efeito da felipressina sobre a pressão arterial em pacientes hipertensos com pressão arterial controlada. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 71 indivíduos com essas características e com necessidade de tratamento periodontal. Após 10 minutos de repouso, a anestesia local (prilocaína) foi infiltrada com e sem adição de felipressina. Em seguida, uma raspagem subgengival profunda foi realizada. A pressão arterial foi medida por um equipamento oscilométrico automático (DIXTAL DX2010). Dez minutos após a administração do anestésico, o pico de ação anestésica foi gravado. O Inventário de Ansiedade Traço-Estado (IDATE) foi utilizado para avaliar o traço de ansiedade nos pacientes. RESULTADOS: A pressão arterial sistólica aumentou após a anestesia, independentemente da associação com felipressina, durante todo o procedimento dentário (p < 0,05), e essa resposta pode ser explicada, pelo menos em parte, pelos níveis de traço de ansiedade dos indivíduos. No entanto, um aumento adicional na pressão arterial diastólica foi observado quando a prilocaína foi associada a felipressina (p < 0,05), mas essa resposta não se alterou com os níveis de traço de ansiedade. CONCLUSÃO: A felipressina aumentou a pressão arterial diastólica de pacientes hipertensos com pressão arterial controlada. Pacientes com traço de ansiedade elevado apresentaram aumento na pressão arterial sistólica em alguns procedimentos, sugerindo que um aumento da pressão arterial também pode estar relacionado ao medo ou à ansiedade.

BACKGROUND: Felypressin has been added to local anesthetic to increase the length of the anesthetic effect and reduce toxicity during dental procedures. However, the effect on blood pressure remains uncertain, and this may be highly relevant in the dental treatment of hypertensive patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of felypressin on blood pressure in hypertensive patients with controlled BP. METHODS: 71 subjects with these characteristics and in need of periodontal treatment were studied. After 10 minutes of rest, local anesthesia (prilocaine) was infiltrated with and without addition of felypressin. Then, a deep subgingival scaling was performed. Blood pressure was measured by an automated oscillometric device (DIXTAL DX2010). Ten minutes after the administration of the anesthetic, peak anesthetic action was recorded. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used to assess the patients' trait anxiety. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure increased after anesthesia, regardless of association with felypressin, throughout the dental procedure (p<0.05) and this response can be explained, at least in part, by the trait anxiety levels of the subjects. However, a further increase in diastolic blood pressure was observed when prilocaine was associated with felypressin (p<0.05), but this response did not change with trait anxiety levels. CONCLUSION: Felypressin increased the diastolic blood pressure of hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure. Patients with high trait anxiety presented increases in systolic blood pressure upon some procedures, suggesting that an increase in blood pressure might also be related to fear or anxiety.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Felypressin has been added to local anesthetic to increase the length of the anesthetic effect and reduce toxicity during dental procedures. However, the effect on blood pressure remains uncertain, and this may be highly relevant in the dental treatment of hypertensive patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of felypressin on blood pressure in hypertensive patients with controlled BP. METHODS: 71 subjects with these characteristics and in need of periodontal treatment were studied. After 10 minutes of rest, local anesthesia (prilocaine) was infiltrated with and without addition of felypressin. Then, a deep subgingival scaling was performed. Blood pressure was measured by an automated oscillometric device (DIXTAL DX2010). Ten minutes after the administration of the anesthetic, peak anesthetic action was recorded. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used to assess the patients' trait anxiety. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure increased after anesthesia, regardless of association with felypressin, throughout the dental procedure (p<0.05) and this response can be explained, at least in part, by the trait anxiety levels of the subjects. However, a further increase in diastolic blood pressure was observed when prilocaine was associated with felypressin (p<0.05), but this response did not change with trait anxiety levels. CONCLUSION: Felypressin increased the diastolic blood pressure of hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure. Patients with high trait anxiety presented increases in systolic blood pressure upon some procedures, suggesting that an increase in blood pressure might also be related to fear or anxiety.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A hipertensão arterial é o maior fator de risco para doença cardiovascular e renal. Inversamente, a doença renal crônica é a forma mais comum de hipertensão secundária e várias evidências sugerem que é um fator de risco independente para mortalidade e morbidade cardiovascular. Balanço de sal positivo é o fator dominante, mas não único na gênese da hipertensão na doença renal crônica. As evidências experimentais demonstraram , claramente que a hipertensão devido à retenção de sal e água é mantida pelos aumento da resistência periférica.O diagnóstico da hipertensão é criticamente dependente das medidas adequadas da pressão arterial, principalmente em pacientes com doença renal crônica, cujo tratamento anti-hipertensivo precoce é mandatório para a prevenção de eventos cardiovasculares. A monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial permitiu identificar pacientes hipertensos de risco elevado. O tratamento da hipertensão em pacientes com doença renal crônica deve levar em consideração a natureza da doença renal subjacente. Pacientes com nefropatia diabética ou doença renal não diabética proteinúrica se beneficiam do tratamento com inibidores da enzima de conversãoda angiotensina ou bloqueadores do receptor de angiotensina II para a meta de pressão arterial < 130/80 mmHG, se tolerado. A meta abaixo de 140/90 mmHg é aceitável para muitos pacientes com outras formas de doença renal. Bloqueio duplo ou triplo do sistema renina angiotensina deve ser evitado.

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease. Conversely, chronic kidney disease is the most common form of secondary hypertension and mounting evidence suggest it is independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. positive salt balance is the dominant but not the sole factor in the genesis of hypertension in chronic kidney disease. The experimental evidences have clearly demonstrated that hypertension due to retention of salt and water is maintained by increased peripheral resistance. The diagnosis of hypertension is critically dependent on accurate blood pressure measurement, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease, in whom early antihypertensive treatment is imperative to prevent cardiovascular events. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has successfully identified hypertensive patients at increased risk. The treatment of hypertension in chronic kidney disease patients should take into consideration the nature of the underlying kidney disease. Patients with diabetic nephropathy or proteinuric nondiabetic kidney disease benefit from treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers to a goal blood pressure of < 140/90 mmHg is acceptable for most patients with other forms of chronic kidney disease. Dual or triple blockade of the renin-angiotensin system should generally be avoided.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is a major issue in public health, and the financial costs associated with hypertension continue to increase. Cost-effectiveness studies focusing on antihypertensive drug combinations, however, have been scarce. The cost-effectiveness ratios of the traditional treatment (hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol) and the current treatment (losartan and amlodipine) were evaluated in patients with grade 1 or 2 hypertension (HT1-2). For patients with grade 3 hypertension (HT3), a third drug was added to the treatment combinations: enalapril was added to the traditional treatment, and hydrochlorothiazide was added to the current treatment. METHODS: Hypertension treatment costs were estimated on the basis of the purchase prices of the antihypertensive medications, and effectiveness was measured as the reduction in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (in mm Hg) at the end of a 12-month study period. RESULTS: When the purchase price of the brand-name medication was used to calculate the cost, the traditional treatment presented a lower cost-effectiveness ratio [US$/mm Hg] than the current treatment in the HT1-2 group. In the HT3 group, however, there was no difference in cost-effectiveness ratio between the traditional treatment and the current treatment. The cost-effectiveness ratio differences between the treatment regimens maintained the same pattern when the purchase price of the lower-cost medication was used. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the traditional treatment is more cost-effective (US$/mm Hg) than the current treatment in the HT1-2 group. There was no difference in cost-effectiveness between the traditional treatment and the current treatment for the HT3 group.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is a major issue in public health, and the financial costs associated with hypertension continue to increase. Cost-effectiveness studies focusing on antihypertensive drug combinations, however, have been scarce. The cost-effectiveness ratios of the traditional treatment (hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol) and the current treatment (losartan and amlodipine) were evaluated in patients with grade 1 or 2 hypertension (HT1-2). For patients with grade 3 hypertension (HT3), a third drug was added to the treatment combinations: enalapril was added to the traditional treatment, and hydrochlorothiazide was added to the current treatment. METHODS: Hypertension treatment costs were estimated on the basis of the purchase prices of the antihypertensive medications, and effectiveness was measured as the reduction in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (in mm Hg) at the end of a 12-month study period. RESULTS: When the purchase price of the brand-name medication was used to calculate the cost, the traditional treatment presented a lower cost-effectiveness ratio [US$/mm Hg] than the current treatment in the HT1-2 group. In the HT3 group, however, there was no difference in cost-effectiveness ratio between the traditional treatment and the current treatment. The cost-effectiveness ratio differences between the treatment regimens maintained the same pattern when the purchase price of the lower-cost medication was used. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the traditional treatment is more cost-effective (US$/mm Hg) than the current treatment in the HT1-2 group. There was no difference in cost-effectiveness between the traditional treatment and the current treatment for the HT3 group.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the importance of providing guidelines to patients via active telephone calls for blood pressure control and for preventing the discontinuation of treatment among hypertensive patients. INTRODUCTION: Many reasons exist for non-adherence to medical regimens, and one of the strategies employed to improve treatment compliance is the use of active telephone calls. METHODS: Hypertensive patients (n=354) who could receive telephone calls to remind them of their medical appointments and receive instruction about hypertension were distributed into two groups: a) "uncomplicated" - hypertensive patients with no other concurrent diseases and b) "complicated" - severe hypertensive patients (mean diastolic ≥ 110 mmHg with or without medication) or patients with comorbidities. All patients, except those excluded (n=44), were open-block randomized to follow two treatment regimens ("traditional" or "current") and to receive or not receive telephone calls ("phone calls" and "no phone calls" groups, respectively). RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients in the "phone calls" group discontinued treatment compared to those in the "no phone calls" group (4 vs. 30; p<0.0094). There was no difference in the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure in the "phone calls" group and "no phone calls" group or in the "traditional" and "current" groups. The percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg) was increased at the end of the treatment (74%), reaching 80% in the "uncomplicated" group and 67% in the "complicated" group (p<0.000001). CONCLUSION: Guidance to patients via active telephone calls is an efficient strategy for preventing the discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the importance of providing guidelines to patients via active telephone calls for blood pressure control and for preventing the discontinuation of treatment among hypertensive patients. INTRODUCTION: Many reasons exist for non-adherence to medical regimens, and one of the strategies employed to improve treatment compliance is the use of active telephone calls. METHODS: Hypertensive patients (n=354) who could receive telephone calls to remind them of their medical appointments and receive instruction about hypertension were distributed into two groups: a) "uncomplicated" - hypertensive patients with no other concurrent diseases and b) "complicated" - severe hypertensive patients (mean diastolic >110 mmHg with or without medication) or patients with comorbidities. All patients, except those excluded (n=44), were open-block randomized to follow two treatment regimens ("traditional" or "current") and to receive or not receive telephone calls ("phone calls" and "no phone calls" groups, respectively). RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients in the "phone calls" group discontinued treatment compared to those in the "no phone calls" group (4 vs. 30; p<0.0094). There was no difference in the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure in the "phone calls" group and "no phone calls" group or in the "traditional" and "current" groups. The percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg) was increased at the end of the treatment (74 percent), reaching 80 percent in the "uncomplicated" group and 67 percent in the "complicated" group (p<0.000001). CONCLUSION: Guidance to patients via active telephone calls is an efficient strategy for preventing the discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is not known if the adjustment of antihypertensive therapy based on home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) can improve blood pressure (BP) control among haemodialysis patients. METHODS: This is an open randomized clinical trial. Hypertensive patients on haemodialysis were randomized to have the antihypertensive therapy adjusted based on predialysis BP measurements or HBPM. Before and after 6 months of follow-up, patients were submitted to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for 24 h, HBPM during 1 week and echocardiogram. RESULTS: A total of 34 and 31 patients completed the study in the HBPM and predialysis BP groups, respectively. At the end of study, the systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure during the interdialytic period measured by ABPM were significantly lower in the HBPM group in relation to the predialysis BP group (mean 24-h BP: 135 +/- 12 mmHg/76 +/- 7 mmHg versus 147 +/- 15 mmHg/79 +/- 8 mmHg; P < 0.05). In the HBPM analysis, the HBPM group showed a significant reduction only in SBP compared to the predialysis BP group (weekly mean: 144 +/- 21 mmHg versus 154 +/- 22 mmHg; P < 0.05). There were no differences between the HBPM and predialysis BP groups in relation to the left ventricular mass index at the end of the study (108 +/- 35 g/m(2) versus 110 +/- 33 g/m(2); P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Decision making based on HBPM among haemodialysis patients has led to a better BP control during the interdialytic period in comparison with predialysis BP measurements. HBPM may be a useful adjuvant instrument for blood pressure control among haemodialysis patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A pressão arterial, como qualquer outra variável fisiológica, tem distribuição normal entre a população. Há uma relação contínua entre pressão arterial e doença cardiovascular, mas não há um valor-limite que separe os pacientes hipertensos que terão um evento cardiovascular futuro daqueles que não o terão. O risco de doença cardiovascular depende da pressão arterial, dos fatores de risco coexistentes e da existência de lesões em órgãos-alvo. O Seventh Joint National Committee (JNC 7) reuniu indivíduos com pressão arterial normal e normal-alta em único grupo, denominado “pré-hipertensão”. Nessa diretriz, a pré-hipertensão é considerada um precursor da hipertensão estágio 1 e índice prognóstico de risco cardiovascular. O estudo inicial deFramingham, porém, assim como as Diretrizes Europeias e Brasileiras de Hipertensão, não sustenta a ideia de rotular indivíduos com pressão arterial normal como sendo pré-hipertensos. A questão-chave que permanece sem resposta é se indivíduos com pressão arterial normal-alta devem ser tratados farmacologicamente antes que progridam para hipertensão. Sabemos que a elevação da pressão arterial representa um fator de risco independente, linear e contínuo para os pacientes, que podem ser vitimados por doenças cardiovasculares.

Blood pressure, like any physiological variable, is normally distributed in the population. There is a continuous relation between blood pressure and cardiovascular disease, but no clear threshold value separates hypertensive patients who will experience future cardiovascular events from those who will not. The risk of cardiovascular disease depends on blood pressure, coexistent risk factors, and whether there is hypertensive damage to target organs. The JNC 7 guidelines combined subjects with normal and high-normal blood pressure into a single group called“ prehypertension”. In this guideline, prehypertension is considered a precursor of stage 1 hypertension and a predictorof excessive cardiovascular risk. However, the initial Framingham study, European and Brazilian hypertension guidelines do not support the idea of labeling subjects with normal blood pressure as being prehypertensive. The key question whether subjects with high-normalblood pressure should be pharmacologically treated beforet hey progress to hypertension remains unanswered. Life-style measures can reduce blood pressure and may prove useful in those with high normal/prehypertension blood pressures

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

O arsenal terapêutico para doenças crônicas, como hipertensão arterial, recebe frequentemente novos medicamentos. Entretanto, mesmo com todo esse investimento, quem trata de pacientes com essas condições continua esbarrando em um problema secular, a falta de adesão à terapêutica, seja ela medicamentosa ou não. Em relação à hipertensão arterial sistólica isolada garantir a adesão é ainda mais difícil, porque é condição relacionada à faixa etária mais avançada. Neste grupo de pacientes, vários fatores agem para levar a pior adesão, desde limitações do paciente, necessidade de cuidadores e prescrições com muitos itens. Abordar o tema adesão em pacientes com essas peculiaridades requer visão individualizada, mas multiprofissional.

New drugs frequently enlarge therapeutic arsenal for chronic illnesses as hypertension. Despite all this investment, who deals with patients with these conditions, continues with a secular problem, the lack of adhesion to prescription. With regard to the systolic hypertension, to guarantee the adhesion is still more difficult because this condition is far more common in elderly. In this group of patients some factors act to take to worse adhesion, since patient’s limitations, caregivers’ need and a great number of medications. To approach the adhesion in patients with these peculiarities requires a differentiated view, but multiprofessional.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A medida de pressão arterial fidedigna é pré-requisito necessário para a verificação de pacientes com suspeita de elevação da pressão arterial ou com hipertensão arterial estabelecida, a qual assegura o diagnóstico e o manuseio corretos da condição de pressão arterial elevada. É também etapa essencial para determinar apropriadamente a necessidade para o tratamento anti-hipertensivo e sua eficácia, tanto quanto para estimar o risco do desenvolvimento de complicações relacionadas à hipertensão. A abordagem usual para a medida da pressão arterial na prática diária está fundamentada em leituras convencionais auscultatórias obtidas no ambiente médico. Apesar de sua comprovada utilidade clínica, agora, sabe-se que tal abordagem sofre numerosas limitações e número crescente de investigações sugere que o uso da pressão arterial fora do consultório complementa as leituras da pressão arterial, podendo melhorar significativamente o manuseio do paciente. Ainda permanecem controvérsias, por exemplo, qual parâmetro da monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial (MAPA) deveria ser usado para diagnosticar a hipertensão ou definir o controle da pressão arterial. A maior vantagem sobre a pressão arterial residencial e de consultório é sua habilidade para medir a pressão arterial durante o sono. A pressão arterial durante o sono pode ser um dos melhores parâmetros para o prognóstico.

The avaibility of accurate blood pressure measurements is a necessary prerequisite to reliably assess patients with suspected blood pressure elevation or with established hypertension that is to ensure correct diagnosis and management of a high blood pressure condition. It is also an essential step to properly determine the need for antihypertensive treatment and its efficacy, as well asto estimate the risk of developing hypertension-related complications. The usual approach to blood pressure measurement in daily practice is based on conventional auscultatory readings obtained in the medical setting. In spite of its proved clinical usefulness, however, such an approach is now acknowledged to suffer from a number of limitations and an increasing number of investigations suggest that the routine use of out-of-office blood pressure, complementing office blood pressure readings, mayadd significant improvements to patient management. Controversy still remains as to what ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameter should be used to diagnose hypertension or to define blood pressure control. A major advantage over clinic and home blood pressure is its ability to measure sleep blood pressure. The sleep blood pressure may be one of the best parameters for prognosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Conhecimentos acumulados ao longo dos anos impossibilitam que, atualmente, o diagnóstico da hipertensão arterial e a avaliação da eficácia da terapia anti-hipertensiva sejam fundamentados única e exclusivamente na pressão arterial de consultório. Métodos de medidas da pressão arterial fora do consultório, como a monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial (MAPA) e a monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA), devem, obrigatoriamente, fazer parte da abordagem de pacientes hipertensos, sob pena de se omitir as melhores evidências para o manejo clínico dos pacientes. Este artigo buscará, de maneira prática e objetiva, fornecer subsídios para a correta realização da MRPA, revisando aspectos técnicos para a realização da monitorização, bem como discutindo suas principais indicações clínicas, a fim de que essa metodologia possa ser utilizada de modo mais proveitoso possível.

Knowledge accumulated over the years shows that currently the diagnosis of hypertension and the effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy can not be based exclusively on the office blood pressure measurement. Blood pressure measurement outside the office as Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM) must be part of the approach of hypertensive patients, otherwise we are omitting the best evidence for the clinical management of these patients. This article is going to show, practically and objectively, subsidies for the correct implementation of HMBP, reviewing technical aspects to carry out the monitoring, as well discussing its major clinical indications, so that this methodology can beused in the most beneficial manner possible.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and clinical blood pressure measures: hypertension prevalence, and nocturnal profile of blood pressure. METHODS: Prospectively, 93 eyes of 83 patients with branch retinal vein occlusion were submitted to ophthalmological examination. Afterwards the patients were submitted to clinical evaluation and blood pressure monitoring. Non-dipper was defined as a fall in systolic blood pressure

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A discussão sobre a interação entre hipertensão arterial e lesão renal vem desde o início so século passado. Dados epidemiológicos atuais apontam a hipertensião arterial sistêmica como o fator de risco mais importante para a perda progressiva da função renal em estudos com pacientes acometidos de doença renal crônica terminal. Existem duas formas distintas de apresentação da lesão renal do paciente hipertenso: a nefroesclerose benigna e a nefroesclerose maligna, sendo ambas distintas tanto do ponto de vista clínico como anatomopatológico. O tratamento da hipertensão arterial visa tanto à prevenção de lesões renais no paciente sem doença prévia como à diminuição da deterioração da lesão renal no paciente com doença renal já instalada, sendo as metas terapêuticas baseadas na redução dos valores da pressão arterial, alvo terapêutico < 130/80 mm Hg, preferencialmente com medicamentos que também diminuam a pressão intraglomerular, como inibidores da enzima de conversão da angiotensina e/ou antagonista da angiotensina II.

Asunto(s)