RESUMEN
(1) Background: Ocular emergencies account for 1.5-3% of emergency department (ED) visits and require urgent diagnosis to prevent serious complications. Ultrasonography is a crucial, non-invasive diagnostic tool for these conditions but traditionally lacks portability and integration with modern electronic smart devices. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and performance of a new handheld ultrasound device in comparison to a conventional cart-based sonographic machine in patients attending to the ED for vitreo-retinal diseases. (2) Methods: three specialists in ophthalmology, with at least 4-year experience in vitreo-retinal diseases and eye ultrasound, evaluated images of 50 eyes with both portable and traditional ultrasound probes. Each specialist made the diagnosis based on the images captured with both probes and then rated their overall image quality and confidence of diagnosis with a five-point Likert scale. The concordance of diagnosis between the two probes was evaluated. (3) Results: The sample comprised 42 patients. Twenty (40%) healthy eyes and thirty eyes with the following vitreo-retinal interface conditions were examined: 12 retinal detachment (24%), 8 vitreous hemorrhage (16%), and 10 posterior vitreous detachment (20%). The overall accuracy of the two devices appeared to be comparable (70.7% vs. 69.3%). The Butterfly iQ+ probe showed similar sensitivity in retinal detachment diagnosis (91.7% vs. 94.4% of the Accutome B-scan Pro), while it showed poor performance in diagnosing posterior vitreous detachment (sensitivity = 27.2%); (4) Conclusions: The Butterfly iQ+ device demonstrated high sensitivity in the diagnosis of retinal detachment. Significant adjustments are still needed to improve the resolution of the vitreous body.
RESUMEN
Background/Objectives: Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) are significant subtypes of melanoma, with an annual incidence of 1.37 per 100,000 people in the U.S. These skin tumors, often found in photo-exposed areas such as the face, are frequently misdiagnosed, leading to delayed treatment or unnecessary excisions, especially in the elderly. Facial melanocytic skin tumors (lentigo maligna-LM/lentigo maligna melanoma-LMM) and their simulators (solar lentigo, pigmented actinic keratosis, seborrheic keratosis and lichen planus-like keratosis) often affect the periocular region. Thus, their diagnosis and management can involve different medical figures, mainly dermatologists and ophthalmologists. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of ophthalmologists to diagnose and manage pigmented skin lesions of the periorbital area. Methods: A multicentric, retrospective, cross-sectional study on a dataset of 79 periorbital pigmented skin lesions with both clinical and dermoscopic images was selected. The images were reviewed by six ophthalmologists and two dermatologists. Descriptive statistics were carried out, and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI), were estimated. Results: Ophthalmologists achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 63.50% (95% CI: 58.99-67.85%), while dermatologists achieved 66.50% (95% CI: 58.5-73.8). The sensitivity was lower for ophthalmologists in respect to dermatologists, 33.3% vs. 46.9%, respectively. Concerning the case difficulty rating, ophthalmologists rated as "difficult" 84% of cases, while for dermatologists, it was about 30%. Management was also consistently different, with a "biopsy" decision being suggested in 25.5% of malignant lesions by ophthalmologists compared with 50% of dermatologists. Conclusions: Ophthalmologists revealed a good diagnostic potential in the identification of periorbital LMs/LMMs. Given progressive population ageing and the parallel increase in facial/periorbital skin tumors, the opportunity to train new generations of ophthalmologists in the early diagnosis of these neoformations should be considered in the next future, also taking into account the surgical difficulty/complexity of this peculiar facial area.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe the outcomes of double implantation of Xen 45 Gel Stent (Xen) using an ab externo approach with closed conjunctiva. METHODS: Retrospective single-centre case series of primary open-angle glaucoma patients with at least six months of follow-up after implantation of a second Xen in the same eye via ab externo technique without conjunctival opening. RESULTS: Eight pseudophakic eyes of 8 patients were included. Intraocular pressure (IOP) dropped from 30 ± 2.6 mmHg pre-operatively to 22.4 ± 2.3 mmHg one month after the first Xen implant (mean difference: -7.6 mmHg [95% confidence interval: -9.4, -5.9 mmHg], p = 0.0092). A second Xen was then implanted to achieve the target IOP. The procedure showed no significant intraoperative or postoperative complications. The IOP dropped to 16.1 ± 2.7 mmHg six months following this second implant (mean difference: -6.3 mmHg [95% confidence interval: -7.2, -5.3 mmHg], p = 0.0183); however, 3 patients needed medical therapy to further reduce the IOP towards the target value. CONCLUSION: Sequential implantation of two Xen 45 Gel Stents using an ab externo approach with closed conjunctiva appears a promising procedure that showed a favorable safety and efficacy profile in this small case series. This pilot data might pave the way for further studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto , Presión Intraocular , Diseño de Prótesis , Stents , Humanos , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/cirugía , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/fisiopatología , Proyectos Piloto , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Agudeza VisualRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe and validate a 3D-printed adapter tool which could be used with either a slit lamp or a condensing lens, interchangeable between devices through magnetic fastening, in order to provide physicians a quick, easy and effective method of obtaining clinical photos. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three specialists, with at least 4-year experience in ophthalmology, gave a rate of image quality obtained by our device and the diagnostic confidence grade. The 3 specialists conducted each 13 or 14 examinations with the smartphone and magnetic adapter. At the end of evaluation, they rated with the Likert scale the ease of use of the device in obtaining clinical images of the anterior segment and ocular fundus respectively. RESULTS: Data of quality perception and confidence demonstrated high values not dissimilar to the "de visu" eye examination. Moreover the instrument we designed turned out to be very user friendly. CONCLUSION: Our adapter coupled with a modern smartphone was able to obtain 4k images and videos of anterior segment, central and peripheral fundus, in an easy and inexpensive way.