RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare choroidal thickness (CT) measurements in preeclamptic and healthy women in the third trimester of pregnancy using optical coherence tomography. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 148 eyes of 74 women, divided into two groups: 27 healthy pregnant women in the third trimester (control group) and 47 age-matched pregnant women in the third trimester with preeclampsia (PE group). Of the 47 subjects in preeclampsia group, 26 were classified as having mild PE and 21 as having severe PE. Choroidal thickness was measured at ten different locations: at the fovea and every 500 µm from the fovea up to 2500 µm temporally and up to 2000 µm nasally. RESULTS: Comparing CT of both groups, choroid always tended to be thicker in subjects with preeclampsia in comparison with healthy pregnant women, with statistical significance in nasal measures. Dividing PE group according to disease severity, women with severe preeclampsia tended to have thicker choroids in comparison with mild preeclamptic and healthy pregnant women. Choroid was also significantly thicker in preeclamptic patients with serous retinal detachment (SRD) in comparison with preeclamptic patients without SRD (P < 0.01 in all macular points). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that choroid tends to be thicker in patients with preeclampsia, with statistical significance only in nasal measures. In patients with SRD, however, choroid is markedly thicker at all points analyzed. From these findings we can hypothesize that preeclampsia can cause a choroidal thickening, which begins in the peripapillary area. As the imbalance increases, the entire choroid becomes thickened.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact of pregnancy on the choroid is still under investigation. The aim of this study is to compare choroidal thickness measurements of healthy pregnant women in the third trimester and healthy non-pregnant women using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 122 eyes of 61 women, divided into two groups: 27 healthy pregnant women in the third trimester and 34 age-matched healthy non-pregnant women. Choroidal thickness was measured using Enhanced Depth Imaging OCT at ten different locations: at the fovea and every 500 µm from the fovea up to 2500 µm temporally and up to 2000 µm nasally. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the ten measurements of choroidal thickness comparing both groups. Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness was 304.1 + 9.6 µm in the control group and 318.1 + 15.6 µm in the pregnant women group (p = 0.446). There was also no statistically significant association between gestational age and choroidal thickness measurements in the healthy pregnant women group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no statistically difference in choroidal thickness between healthy non-pregnant women and healthy pregnant women in the third trimester.

RESUMEN

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE:: The prevalence and characteristics of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have changed over time, reflecting the nutritional transition and changes in diagnostic criteria. We aimed to evaluate characteristics of women with GDM over a 20-year interval. DESIGN AND SETTING:: Comparison of two pregnancy cohorts enrolled in different periods, in university hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil: 1991 to 1993 (n = 216); and 2009 to 2013 (n = 375). METHODS:: We applied two diagnostic criteria to the cohorts: International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG)/World Health Organization (WHO); and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). We compared maternal-fetal characteristics and outcomes between the cohorts and within each cohort. RESULTS:: The women in the 2010s cohort were older (31 ± 7 versus 30 ± 6 years), more frequently obese (29.4% versus 15.2%), with more hypertensive disorders (14.1% versus 5.6%) and at increased risk of cesarean section (adjusted relative risk 1.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.4 - 2.3), compared with those in the 1990s cohort. Neonatal outcomes such as birth weight category and hypoglycemia were similar. In the 1990s cohort, women only fulfilling IADPSG/WHO or only fulfilling NICE criteria had similar characteristics and outcomes; in the 2010s cohort, women only diagnosed through IADPSG/WHO were more frequently obese than those diagnosed only through NICE (33 ± 8 kg/m2 versus 28 ± 6 kg/m2; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION:: The epidemic of obesity seems to have modified the profile of women with GDM. Despite similar neonatal outcomes, there were differences in the intensity of treatment over time. The IADPSG/WHO criteria seemed to identify a profile more associated with obesity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The prevalence and characteristics of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have changed over time, reflecting the nutritional transition and changes in diagnostic criteria. We aimed to evaluate characteristics of women with GDM over a 20-year interval. DESIGN AND SETTING: Comparison of two pregnancy cohorts enrolled in different periods, in university hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil: 1991 to 1993 (n = 216); and 2009 to 2013 (n = 375). METHODS: We applied two diagnostic criteria to the cohorts: International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG)/World Health Organization (WHO); and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). We compared maternal-fetal characteristics and outcomes between the cohorts and within each cohort. RESULTS: The women in the 2010s cohort were older (31 ± 7 versus 30 ± 6 years), more frequently obese (29.4% versus 15.2%), with more hypertensive disorders (14.1% versus 5.6%) and at increased risk of cesarean section (adjusted relative risk 1.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.4 - 2.3), compared with those in the 1990s cohort. Neonatal outcomes such as birth weight category and hypoglycemia were similar. In the 1990s cohort, women only fulfilling IADPSG/WHO or only fulfilling NICE criteria had similar characteristics and outcomes; in the 2010s cohort, women only diagnosed through IADPSG/WHO were more frequently obese than those diagnosed only through NICE (33 ± 8 kg/m2 versus 28 ± 6 kg/m2; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The epidemic of obesity seems to have modified the profile of women with GDM. Despite similar neonatal outcomes, there were differences in the intensity of treatment over time. The IADPSG/WHO criteria seemed to identify a profile more associated with obesity.

RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Prevalência e características do diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) modificaram-se com o tempo, refletindo transição nutricional e diferentes critérios diagnósticos. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar características de gestações com DMG em intervalo de 20 anos. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Comparação de duas coortes gestacionais arroladas em diferentes períodos, em hospitais universitários de Porto Alegre, Brasil: 1991 a 1993 (n = 216) e 2009 a 2013 (n = 375). MÉTODOS: Aplicamos dois critérios diagnósticos às coortes: International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG)/Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS); e National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Comparamos características e desfechos materno-fetais entre as coortes e dentro de cada uma. RESULTADOS: Na coorte dos anos 2010, as mulheres eram mais velhas (31 ± 7 versus 30 ± 6 anos), obesas (29,4% versus 15,2%), apresentaram mais distúrbios hipertensivos (14,1% versus 5,6%) e risco aumentado de cesariana (risco relativo ajustado 1,8; intervalo de confiança de 95% 1,4 - 2,3), comparadas às da coorte de 1990. Desfechos neonatais, como categoria do peso ao nascer e hipoglicemia, foram semelhantes. Na coorte de 1990, essas características e desfechos foram semelhantes nas mulheres que preenchiam apenas um dos critérios; na de 2010, mulheres diagnosticadas apenas pelo IADPSG/OMS eram mais obesas (33 ± 8 kg/m2 versus 28 ± 6 kg/m2, P < 0,001) do que as diagnosticadas apenas pelo NICE. CONCLUSÃO: A epidemia de obesidade parece ter modificado o perfil de mulheres com DMG. Embora desfechos neonatais sejam semelhantes, houve diferenças na intensidade de tratamento ao longo do tempo. O critério da IADPSG/OMS parece identificar um perfil mais associado à obesidade.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and vitamin D deficiency have been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes but the consequences of both conditions simultaneously present in pregnancy have not yet been evaluated. Our objective was to study the influence of vitamin D deficiency in neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with GDM. METHODS: 184 pregnant women with GDM referred to specialized prenatal monitoring were included in this cohort and had blood sampled for 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement. Vitamin D was measured by chemiluminescence and deficiency was defined as < 20 ng/mL. Participants were followed until puerperium and adverse neonatal outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Newborns of women with vitamin D deficiency had higher incidences of hospitalization in intensive care units (ICU) (32 vs 19%, P = 0.048), of hypoglycemia (any, 17.3 vs 7.1%, P = 0.039requiring ICU, 15.3 vs 3.6%, P = 0.008), and were more frequently small for gestational age (SGA) (17.3 vs 5.9%, P = 0.017). After adjustment, relative risk (RR) for hypoglycemia requiring ICU was 3.63 (95%CI 1.09-12.11) and for SGA was 4.32 (95%CI 1.75-10.66). The incidence of prematurity, jaundice and shoulder dystocia was no statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of pregnant women with GDM, vitamin D deficiency was associated with a major increase in the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes such as SGA newborns and neonatal hypoglycemia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated to increased rates of large for gestational age (LGA) newborns and macrosomia. Several charts are used to classify birth weight. Is there an ideal chart to classify newborns of GDM mothers? Methods: We evaluated adequacy of birth weight of 332 neonates born to GDM mothers at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. Newborns were classified according to gestational age as small (SGA), adequate, or large (LGA) based on four charts: Alexander, Pedreira, INTERGROWTH 21st Project, and SINASC-2012. The latter was built using data from a large national registry of 2012, the Born Alive National Surveillance System (Sistema de Informações de Nascidos Vivos ­ SINASC), which included 2,905.789 birth certificates. Frequencies of SGA and LGA and Kappa agreement were calculated. Results: In non-gender adjusted curves, SGA rates (95% confidence interval) varied from 8% (5-11) to 9% (6-13); LGA rates, from 11% (8-15) to 17% (13-21). For males, SGA rates varied from 3% (1-6%) to 6% (3-11%), and LGA rates, from 18% (13-24%) to 31% (24-38%); for females, SGA rates were from 3% (1-7%) to 10% (6-16%) and LGA rates, from 11% (6-16%) to 19% (13-26%). Kappa results were: ALEXANDER vs. SINASC-2012: 0.80 (0.73-0.88); INTERGROWTH 21st vs. SINASC-2012 (adjusted by sex): 0.62 (0.53-0.71); INTERGROWTH 21st vs. PEDREIRA: 0.71 (0.62-0.79); SINASC-2012 (by sex) vs. PEDREIRA: 0.86 (0.79-0.93). Conclusions: Misclassification has to be taken into account when evaluating newborns of GDM mothers, as LGA rates can almost double depending on the chart used to classify birth weight (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to estimate the local rate of postpartum diabetes screening after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pregnancies, and to identify clinical variables associated with retesting rates and with the persistence of decreased glucose tolerance. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort of GDM women with prenatal delivery at a specialized center, from November 2009 to May 2012. All women were advised to schedule a 6 weeks postpartum 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). RESULTS: Of the 209 women included, 108 (51.7%) returned to be tested with fasting plasma glucose (n=14), OGTT (n=93) or random glucose (n=1). Return was associated with lower parity rate (2 vs. 3, p<0.001) and higher pregnancy 2-h OGTT (165 vs. 155 mg/dL, p=0.034), but not with socio-demographic characteristics. Four women (3.7%) had diabetes, 22 (20.4%) had impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance. Persistent hyperglycemia was associated with a positive family history of diabetes (relative risk-RR 2.41, p=0.050), diagnostic 2-h OGTT in pregnancy (RR 1.01, p=0.045), insulin use during pregnancy (RR 2.37, p=0.014), and cesarean section (RR 2.61, p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Even though postpartum abnormalities were frequent in GDM, rates of postpartum diabetes screening were undesirably low. As no specific clinical profile defines who will adhere to postpartum testing, it is essential to encourage all women to reevaluate their glucose status, particularly those with a family history of diabetes and more severe hyperglycemia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: The aims of this study were to estimate the local rate of postpartum diabetes screening after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pregnancies, and to identify clinical variables associated with retesting rates and with the persistence of decreased glucose tolerance. Subjects and methods: Prospective cohort of GDM women with prenatal delivery at a specialized center, from November 2009 to May 2012. All women were advised to schedule a 6 weeks postpartum 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Results: Of the 209 women included, 108 (51.7%) returned to be tested with fasting plasma glucose (n = 14), OGTT (n = 93) or random glucose (n = 1). Return was associated with lower parity rate (2 vs. 3, p < 0.001) and higher pregnancy 2-h OGTT (165 vs. 155 mg/dL, p = 0.034), but not with socio-demographic characteristics. Four women (3.7%) had diabetes, 22 (20.4%) had impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance. Persistent hyperglycemia was associated with a positive family history of diabetes (relative risk - RR 2.41, p = 0.050), diagnostic 2-h OGTT in pregnancy (RR 1.01, p = 0.045), insulin use during pregnancy (RR 2.37, p = 0.014), and cesarean section (RR 2.61, p = 0.015). Conclusions: Even though postpartum abnormalities were frequent in GDM, rates of postpartum diabetes screening were undesirably low. As no specific clinical profile defines who will adhere to postpartum testing, it is essential to encourage all women to reevaluate their glucose status, particularly those with a family history of diabetes and more severe hyperglycemia. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2014;58(2):197-204 .

Objetivos: Os objetivos foram estimar a taxa de reavaliação de diabetes pós-parto em mulheres com diabetes melito gestacional (DMG) e identificar fatores associados ao retorno e à persistência das alterações glicêmicas. Sujeitos e métodos: Coorte prospectiva de mulheres com DMG atendidas em ambulatório de pré-natal especializado, de novembro de 2009 a maio de 2012. Todas foram orientadas a agendar o teste oral de tolerância à glicose (TOTG) a partir da sexta semana pós-parto. Resultados: Das 209 mulheres arroladas na gestação, 108 (51,7%) foram avaliadas após o parto: 14 com glicemia de jejum, 93 com o TOTG e uma com glicemia ao acaso. O retorno para reavaliação foi associado com menor paridade (2 vs. 3, p < 0,001) e com glicemia de 2-h mais elevada no TOTG diagnóstico (165 vs. 155 mg/dL, p = 0,034). Diabetes foi diagnosticado em quatro mulheres (3,7%) e pré-diabetes em 22 (20,4%). Análise multivariada evidenciou que a história familiar de diabetes (risco relativo – RR 2,41, p = 0,050), a glicemia de 2 horas no TOTG da gestação (RR 1,01, p = 0,045), o uso de insulina na gestação (RR 2,37, p = 0,014) e a taxa de cesariana (RR 2,61, p = 0,015) foram os fatores associados à persistência da hiperglicemia. Conclusões: O retorno para reavaliação foi baixo, embora as alterações glicêmicas tenham sido frequentes. Como não houve fatores que indiquem quais mulheres retornarão, estratégias para aumentar a adesão são necessárias, especialmente quando há história familiar ou o DMG foi mais grave. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2014;58(2):197-204 .

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introdução: O diabetes é complicação clínica frequente na gestação e sua prevalência vem aumentando nos últimos anos. Objetivo: Analisar a frequência dos tipos de diabetes na gestação, as características clínicas das gestantes e alguns desfechos materno-fetais, em pré-natal de alto risco. Método: Estudo retrospectivo de revisão dos prontuários eletrônicos de mulheres com diabetes e gestação atendidas no período de janeiro 2009 a junho 2010 no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Resultados: Nesse período, 173 gestantes foram atendidas no ambulatório de gestação e diabetes, no total de 1459 consultas. O diabetes gestacional ocorreu em 84% das gestantes, 8% apresentaram diabetes tipo 2, 6%, diabetes tipo 1 e 2%, outros tipos. As mulheres com diabetes gestacional apresentaram HbA1c inferior às demais. A maioria das pacientes iniciou o pré-natal após o primeiro trimestre. A taxa geral de cesariana foi de 56%, tendo sido mais frequente no diabetes tipo 1. O recém-nascido foi considerado pequeno para a idade gestacional em 9% dos casos, e grande em 13%, sem diferença entre os tipos de diabetes. Nas mulheres com diabetes gestacional, o peso do recém-nascido correlacionou-se positivamente com o índice de massa corporal, glicemia de jejum ao diagnóstico e HbA1c da mãe. Conclusão: O diabetes associado à gestação é motivo frequente de atendimento no pré-natal especializado do HCPA, sendo a maioria diabetes gestacional. Nesses casos, obesidade e pior controle glicêmico associaram-se com o peso fetal aumentado. As gestantes chegam tardiamente ao centro de tratamento, com controle metabólico aquém do recomendado.

Background: Gestational diabetes is a common complication of pregnancy and its prevalence has increased in the last years. Aim: To describe the frequency of different types of diabetes, maternal clinical characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant diabetic women who received prenatal care at a high-risk prenatal center. Method: Review of medical records of pregnant diabetic women who received prenatal care between January 2009 and June 2010 at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Results: In this period, 173 pregnant diabetic women received prenatal care; 1,459 medical visits were made. Gestational diabetes was diagnosed in 84% of the women, 8% had type 2 diabetes, 6% had type 1 diabetes, and 2% had other types of diabetes. Women with gestational diabetes had lower HbA1c than the other diabetic groups. Most patients started the prenatal care after the first quarter. The global frequency of cesarean section was 56% but it was more frequent among type 1 diabetics. Newborns were small for gestational age in 9% of the cases and large for gestational age in 13%, without significant differences between different types of diabetes. In gestational diabetic women, birth weight was associated with mother’s body mass index, fasting glycemia at diagnosis, and HbA1c. Conclusion: Diabetes associated with pregnancy is a frequent reason for prenatal care at HCPA; gestational diabetes is the most frequent type of diabetes and, in these women, maternal obesity and worst glycemic control adversely influenced fetal birth weight. Patients arrive with a suboptimal glycemic control and start their treatment with undesirable delay.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJETIVOS: descrever, em gestantes do Estudo Brasileiro do Diabetes Gestacional (EBDG), a distribuição da altura uterina de acordo com a idade gestacional e validar a curva do Centro Latino-Americano de Perinatologia (CLAP), curva de referência para a predição de anormalidades do crescimento fetal. MÉTODOS: o EBDG é uma coorte de 5564 gestantes, com mais de 19 anos, seguidas até e após o parto. Entrevistas e medidas antropométricas padronizadas foram feitas no arrolamento entre a 20ª e a 28ª semana. Os prontuários foram revisados segundo protocolo padronizado, abrangendo os períodos de pré-natal e parto. As análises referem-se a 3539 gestantes com datação da gravidez confirmada por ultra-sonografia. Determinamos as propriedades diagnósticas dos percentis 10 e 90 de altura uterina de ambas as curvas (EBDG e CLAP) como indicadores de anormalidade no peso neonatal. RESULTADOS: as medidas de altura uterina no EBDG foram maiores que as do CLAP em todas as semanas de gestação (1 a 4 cm e 2 a 6 cm, respectivamente, nos percentis 10 e 90). O percentil 10 do CLAP identificou como pequenas as medidas uterinas de 0,3 a 1,7 por cento das gestantes brasileiras, ao passo que o percentil 90 classificou como grandes as medidas uterinas de 42 a 57 por cento das brasileiras. A sensibilidade do percentil 10 do CLAP para predizer recém-nascidos pequenos para a idade gestacional variou de 0,8 a 6 por cento e a especificidade do percentil 90 para predizer grandes para a idade gestacional, de 46 a 61 por cento. CONCLUSÕES: a curva de referência do CLAP não reflete o padrão de crescimento uterino das gestantes brasileiras, limitando sua capacidade de identificar anormalidades de crescimento fetal, especialmente a restrição de crescimento.

PURPOSE: to describe, in participants of the Brazilian Study of Gestational Diabetes (EBDG), the percentile distribution of uterine height by gestational age and to validate the use of percentiles of the chart derived by the "Centro Latino-Americano de Perinatologia" (CLAP), used as reference in predicting abnormal fetal growth. METHODS: the EBDG is a cohort study of 5564 pregnant women older than 19 years, followed through and after delivery. Interviews and standardized anthropometry were performed at baseline between 20-28 weeks. Medical records covering prenatal and delivery periods were then reviewed following a standardized approach. Analyses pertain to 3539 women with gestational age confirmed by ultrasound. Diagnostic properties of the 10th and the 90th percentiles of both charts (EBDG and CLAP) as predictors of abnormal neonatal weight were determined. RESULTS: uterine height was higher in EBDG than in the CLAP chart at every gestational week, being 1-4 and 2-6 cm greater, at the 10th and 90th percentiles respectively. The CLAP 10th percentile classified as small the uterine heights of only 0.3 to 1.7 percent of Brazilian women, while the 90th percentile classified as large the uterine heights of 42 to 57 percent of the sample. The sensitivity of CLAP percentile 10 in the prediction of small for gestational age varied from 0.8 to 6 percent and the specificity of CLAP percentile 90 in the prediction of large for gestational age, from 46 to 61 percent. CONCLUSIONS: the CLAP uterine height reference chart does not reflect the current uterine growth pattern of pregnant Brazilians, limiting its clinical applicability in the detection of abnormal fetal growth, especially intrauterine growth restriction.

Asunto(s)