RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medical abortion with mifepristone and prostaglandins is well established. We compared clinical assessment with self-assessment of abortion outcome. METHODS: This randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial was done in four clinics in Austria, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, between Aug 16, 2011, and Jan 31, 2013. Women aged 18 years and older who had requested medical termination of a pregnancy up to 63 days of gestation were eligible. Computer-generated block randomisation (block size ten) assigned women in a 1:1 ratio to attend routine clinical follow-up or to self-assess outcome at home with a semiquantitative urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test 1-3 weeks after abortion. The primary outcome was the percentage of women with complete abortion not requiring further medical or surgical intervention within 3 months. Analysis was per protocol and by intention to treat. The non-inferiority margin was five percentage points. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01487213. FINDINGS: 924 women were assigned routine follow-up (n=466) or self-assessment (n=458) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. 901 were included in the per-protocol analysis (n=446 and n=455, respectively). Complete abortion was reported in 432 (95%) of 455 in the routine follow-up group and 419 (94%) of 446 women in the self-assessment group (crude difference -1·0, 95% CI -4·0 to 2·0). 20 (4%) women in the routine follow-up group and 17 (4%) in the self-assessment group required surgery. No women in the routine follow-up group versus three in the self-assessment group had undetected continuing pregnancies. Eight (1·8%) and one (0·2%) women, respectively, had infections (p=0·038). INTERPRETATION: Self-assessment was non-inferior to routine follow-up and could save resources. FUNDING: Nordic Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, European Society of Contraception, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helse Finnmark, Swedish Research Council, and Stockholm County Council and Karolinska University Hospital.
Asunto(s)
Abortivos Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Mifepristona/uso terapéutico , Prostaglandinas/uso terapéutico , Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Adulto , Austria , Gonadotropina Coriónica/orina , Femenino , Finlandia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Embarazo , Pruebas de Embarazo/normas , Suecia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of 400 mug oral versus self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home on pre-operative cervical priming in both primigravid and multigravid women prior to first trimester surgical abortion. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Norwegian University Teaching Hospital. SAMPLE: Three hundred and thirty-eight women undergoing surgical abortion between 7 and 12 weeks of gestation. METHODS: The women were randomised to either 400 microg of oral misoprostol the evening before or 400-microg of self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home the same day as vacuum aspiration. Main outcome measures Pre-operative cervical dilatation, complications and acceptability. RESULTS: The median cervical dilatation was 6.2 mm (range 0-11 mm) for the women in the 400 mug oral misoprostol and 6.5 mm (range 0-11 mm) in the 400-microg vaginal misoprostol groups. The median pre-operative dilatation was larger in multigravidae (6.4 and 6.7 mm for the oral and vaginal routes, respectively) than in primigravidae (5.8 and 6.0 mm, respectively). In primigravidae, 19% achieved a pre-operative dilatation of > or = 7 mm, with no significant difference between oral and vaginal dosage. In multigravidae, 52% achieved a pre-operative dilatation of > or = 7 mm with vaginal dosage, compared with 36% with oral dosage (P = 0.03). There was no difference between non-immigrant versus immigrant women in pre-operative cervical dilatation. The 400-microg oral dosage group had a higher risk of bleeding, compared with the group receiving 400-microg vaginal misoprostol [odds ratio (OR) = 10.4; confidence interval (CI) 5.2-20.8]. There was no difference between non-immigrant and immigrant women in acceptability of self-administered vaginal misoprostol; almost all women found this administration route acceptable. Complications were minor and were distributed equally between the two dosage groups. CONCLUSIONS: The vaginal route will result in a satisfactory dilatation in about half of multigravidae but is much less effective in primigravidae. The oral route does not lead to satisfactory dilatation in either group and is associated with a higher occurrence of pre-operative bleeding. Self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home is highly acceptable.