RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and causes of childhood blindness in an underserved community in south-eastern Nigeria using the key informant method. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. Key informants (KI) appointed by their respective communities received 1-day training on identification of blind children in their communities. Two weeks later, the research team visited the agreed sites within the community and examined the identified children. The World Health Organization eye examination record for blind children was used for data collection. Data entry and analysis were done with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. RESULTS: Fifteen blind or severely visually impaired children (age range 3 months to 15 years) were identified in this community; nine of these were brought by the KIs. The prevalence of childhood blindness/severe visual impairment (BL/SVI) was 0.12 per 1000 children. By anatomical classification, operable cataract in 6 (40.0%) was the leading cause of BL/SVI in the series; followed by optic nerve lesions (atrophy/hypoplasia) in 3 (20.0%). The etiology of BL/SVI is unknown for the majority of the children (66.7%). It was presumed hereditary in four children (26.7%). Sixty percent of the blindness was judged avoidable. Only three children (20.0%) were enrolled in the Special Education Centre for the Blind. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of childhood BL/SVI in our study population is low but over half of the blindness is avoidable. There may be a significant backlog of operable childhood cataract in south-eastern Nigeria. The KI method is a practical method for case finding of blind children in rural communities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the concordance between the diagnostic tests for dry eye disease (DED) in a Nigerian hospital population. METHODS: The study was a hospital-based cross-sectional survey of adults (≥18 years) presenting at the eye clinic of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu; September-December, 2011. Participants' socio-demographic data were collected. Each subject was assessed for DED using the "Ocular Surface Disease Index" (OSDI) questionnaire, tear-film breakup time (TBUT), and Schirmer test. The intertest concordance was assessed using kappa statistic, correlation, and regression coefficients. RESULTS: The participants (n=402; men: 193) were aged 50.1±19.1 standard deviation years (range: 18-94 years). Dry eye disease was diagnosed in 203 by TBUT, 170 by Schirmer test, and 295 by OSDI; the concordance between the tests were OSDI versus TBUT (Kappa, κ=-0.194); OSDI versus Schirmer (κ=-0.276); and TBUT versus Schirmer (κ=0.082). Ocular Surface Disease Index was inversely correlated with Schirmer test (Spearman ρ=-0.231, P<0.001) and TBUT (ρ=-0.237, P<0.001). In the linear regression model, OSDI was poorly predicted by TBUT (ß=-0.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.26 to -0.03, P=0.14) and Schirmer test (ß=-0.35, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.18, P=0.18). CONCLUSION: At UNTH, there is poor agreement, and almost equal correlation, between the subjective and objective tests for DED. Therefore, the selection of diagnostic test for DED should be informed by cost-effectiveness and diagnostic resource availability, not diagnostic efficiency or utility.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: When presbyopia (loss of accommodation of the crystalline lens with increasing age) sets in, doing near work becomes associated with headache and eye strain. Reading and writing become a challenge. Literacy levels may be low in rural communities; nevertheless some work other than reading, like sewing, sorting stone from grain and operating mobile phones, is done with dissatisfaction. This study aims to determine the prevalence of presbyopia, the unmet presbyopia need and the presbyopia correction coverage in a rural African community. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out in a rural population aged 35 years and greater, selected by cluster random sampling. Information was sought on biodata of the participants and they were subsequently examined. Distance visual acuity for each participant was determined. Anterior and posterior segments of the eyes were examined. Objective refraction with subjective refinement was done on all subjects with distant visual acuity less than 6/6. Near visual acuity was assessed at 40 cm with distant correction in place if required. Presbyopia was defined as inability to read N8 at 40 cm or requiring an addition of at least +1.00DS to improve near vision to at least N8. Questionnaires were administered to those identified as presbyopic on source of procurement of spectacles (if they had one) and on reasons for non-procurement of presbyopic spectacles. They were also asked to rate their difficulty with various listed near work. Data entry and analysis were done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v16.0 and Program for Epidemiologist v4.01 software. RESULTS: A total of 585 subjects (participation rate 81.1%) aged 35 years and greater were interviewed and examined. The prevalence of presbyopia was 63.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 62.6-64.2%). There was increasing prevalence with increasing age. The met presbyopia need was 17.6%, unmet need was 45.8% and presbyopic correction coverage was 27.8%. The commonest reasons for not procuring presbyopic correction were 'not a priority' (21.5%) and 'cost' (21.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of presbyopia in this rural African community is high. Many who need presbyopic correction do not have corrective spectacles.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence, distribution and risk factors for dry eye disease (DED) in a tertiary ophthalmic outpatient population. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional descriptive hospital-based survey conducted at the Eye clinic of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu, between September and December, 2011. The participants comprised adult ophthalmic outpatients aged 18 years or older. Participants' sociodemographic data were obtained. Dry eye disease was assessed subjectively with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire; and objectively with Schirmer's test and Tear-film Break-up Time (TBUT). An OSDI score of ≥ 50 with a TBUT of <10s or Schirmer's test reading of <10mm was considered diagnostic of DED. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed. In all comparisons, a p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The participants (n=402) comprised 193 males and 209 females who were aged 50.1 ± 19.06 SD years (range 18-94 years). The majorities of the participants were married - 74.1%, possessed formal education - 86.0% and were civil servants - 33.6%. The prevalence of DED was 19.2%. Dry eye disease was significantly associated with age>40 years (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.06-3.35, p=0.0004), non-possession of formal education (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.74, p=0.001) but not gender (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.89-2.46, p=0.158). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of DED among ophthalmic outpatients at UNTH, Enugu, is comparatively high. Older age and illiteracy are predictors of DED. There is need for high index of diagnostic suspicion to prevent sight-threatening complications of DED.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: To review the management of cataract in children in a tertiary hospital in a developing country, and to highlight the challenges therein. METHODS: The hospital records of children aged 15 years or less that had cataract surgery at University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu from 2005 to 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Information was obtained on bio-data, pre- and post-operative visual acuity (VA), biometry, and type of surgery, use of intraocular lens (IOL) and presence of co-morbidity. SPSS was used for data entry and analysis. RESULTS: The hospital records of 21 children (26 eyes) were analyzed. There were 12 males (57.1%) and 9 females (42.9%). Pre-operative VA could not be assessed in 11 eyes (42.3%), 14 eyes (53.9%) had VA <3/60 and 1 eye (3.8%) had VA 6/60. Biometry was done in only 5 eyes (19.2%). All eyes had standard extracapsular cataract extraction without primary posterior capsulectomy; 12 eyes (46.2%) had posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL) implant while 13 eyes (50.0%) had no IOL. After 12 weeks of follow up, vision assessment was available in only 15 eyes. With best correction, VA of 6/18 or better was achieved in only 5 eyes (33.3%). CONCLUSION: Inadequate facilities and inadequate follow up after surgery are some of the challenges in managing paediatric cataract in the developing countries. If these challenges are not addressed, cataract will remain a major cause of childhood blindness and low vision in Africa for many years. There should be collaboration between Paediatric Ophthalmology Centres in industrialized and developing countries to enhance skill transfer. Governmental and International Non-governmental Organizations can go a long way to facilitate this exchange.