RESUMEN
CONTEXT: A major indication for referrals for bone scans (BS) to establish or exclude skeletal metastases. Few patients are referred with clinically indeterminate diagnosis or cancer of unknown primary (CUP), to search for bony metastases or primary tumor. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the usefulness or otherwise for BS in such instances. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study of BS performed for CUP and indeterminate diagnosis from 2012 to 2016 in the nuclear medicine unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study involved reviews of technetium-99m diphosphonate BS for patients with CUP. BSs were reported by nuclear physicians as normal, normal variants, suspicious for metastases or as malignant, and with solitary or multiple skeletal metastases. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 for descriptive analysis. Continuous data were displayed as means along with their standard deviation; categorical data were tabulated as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: Of 2156 BS, 42 (0.02%) were eligible. Patients were aged 27-86 years, mainly in the sixth and seventh decades of life. Bone metastases were identified in 14 (33%) of these patients, whereas 17 BS (40%) were normal, BS appeared equivocal in 10 (23.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography availability would resolve the clinical dilemma in patients with equivocal and apparently normal BS.
Résumé Contexte:Une indication majeure pour les références à des scintigraphies osseuses (BS) pour établir ou exclure des métastases squelettiques. Peu de patients sont référés avec diagnostic cliniquement indéterminé ou cancer primitif inconnu (CUP), pour rechercher des métastases osseuses ou une tumeur primitive.Objectifs:Cette étude visait à évaluer l'utilité ou non de la BS dans de tels cas.Paramètres et conception:Une étude transversale rétrospective sur le BS réalisée pour CUP et diagnostic indéterminé de 2012 à 2016 dans l'unité de médecine nucléaire d'un hôpital universitaire tertiaire.Sujets et Méthodes:L'étude comprenait des examens du diphosphonate de technétium-99m BS pour les patients atteints de CUP. Des BS ont été signalés par des médecins nucléaires comme normales, variantes normales, suspectes de métastases ou malignes, et avec métastases squelettiques solitaires ou multiples.Analyses statistiques utilisé:Les données ont été analysées à l'aide de SPSS version 21 pour une analyse descriptive. Les données continues ont été affichées comme moyennes avec leur l'ecarts t; les données catégorielles ont été présentées sous forme de fréquences et de pourcentages.Résultats:Sur 2156 BS, 42 (0,02%) étaient éligibles. Les patients étaient âgés 27 à 86 ans, principalement dans les sixième et septième décennies de la vie. Des métastases osseuses ont été identifiées chez 14 (33 %) de ces patients, alors que 17 BS (40 %) étaient normaux, la BS semblait équivoque dans 10 cas (23,8 %).Conclusions:Tomodensitométrie par émission de photons uniques/tomodensitométrie la disponibilité résoudrait le dilemme clinique chez les patients atteints de BS équivoque et apparemment normale.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/patología , Cintigrafía , Radiofármacos , Huesos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos/patología , Medronato de Tecnecio Tc 99mRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) is established as an efficient means of treating toxic goiter (TG) globally. The field of nuclear medicine (NM) still appears novel to many Nigerian clinicians and patients. A culturally embedded dread of radiation may raise ethical and moral concerns about potential adverse effects in the wake of RAIT in our setting. An adverse drug reaction may be described as "a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurs at doses normally used in man". This study therefore, seeks to review adverse reactions (ARs) experienced following RAIT. We would also like to improve patient and physician education about the safety profile of RAIT. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who had received RAIT for thyroid disease from August 2006 to June 2015. RESULTS: Forty typical ARs were experienced following 36 therapy sessions (18.65%) with RAIT in 35 patients (21.47%) aged 17-78 years, of which three had multiple sessions for well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma (WDTC). CONCLUSION: RAIT remains a safe option for the treatment of benign and TG. The experienced ARs are mainly mild to moderate in severity and mostly short-lived. As larger doses of radioactive iodine for WDTC and TG were more commonly associated with ARs, our study suggests that these patients merit stronger prophylactic measures as well as closer monitoring for earlier detection and management of these reactions.
RESUMEN
Hyperthyroidism continues to be a pressing public health concern in West Africa. Its prevalence in Africa has been quoted as 1.2%-9.9%, with Graves' disease as its most common cause. Radioiodine-131 (RAI) therapy of hyperthyroidism recently commenced in two government hospitals in Ghana and Nigeria. This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with RAI for primary hyperthyroidism at the National Centre for Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine (NCRNM) from 2008-2013, and in the University College Hospital (UCH) from 2006-2013. Cure was defined as euthyroidism or hypothyroidism occurring at 6 months post-RAI. Data were analysed using SPSS version 21 and Epi Info version, categorical data were evaluated with the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. 94 patients were studied, aged 20-74 years; 78 were females, and 16 were males. 38 were Ghanaian and 56 Nigerian. The presence of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) made cure less likely (χ(2) P = 0.006, odds ratio = 0.118; 95% confidence interval, 0.027-0.518). Other factors assessed proved to be insignificant. Our findings suggest that hyperthyroid patients with TAO will benefit from a higher RAI dose than their counterparts without TAO.