RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Continuous EEG (cEEG) practice has markedly changed over the last decade given its utility in improving critical care outcomes. However, there are limited data describing the current cEEG infrastructure in US hospitals. METHODS: A web-based cEEG practice survey was sent to neurophysiologists at 123 ACGME-accredited epilepsy or clinical neurophysiology programs. RESULTS: Neurophysiologists from 100 (81.3%) institutions completed the survey. Most institutions had 3 to 10 EEG faculty (80.0%), 1 to 5 fellows (74.8%), ≥6 technologists (84.9%), and provided coverage to neurology ICUs with >10 patients (71.0%) at a time. Round-the-clock EEG technologist coverage was available at most (90.0%) institutions with technologists mostly being in-house (68.0%). Most institutions without after-hours coverage (8 of 10) attributed this to insufficient technologists. The typical monitoring duration was 24 to 48 hours (23.0 and 40.0%), most commonly for subclinical seizures (68.4%) and spell characterization (11.2%). Larger neurology ICUs had more EEG technologists ( p = 0.02), fellows ( p = 0.001), and quantitative EEG use ( p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This survey explores current cEEG practice patterns in the United States. Larger centers had more technologists and fellows. Overall technologist numbers are stable over time, but with a move toward more in-hospital compared with home-based coverage. Reduced availability of EEG technologists was a major factor limiting cEEG availability at some centers.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sexual harassment is a known problem in surgical training and a focus of growing attention in recent years. However, the environments where sexual harassment in surgical training most commonly takes place are not yet described. METHODS: An anonymous, voluntary, electronic survey was distributed to surgical trainees, and all programs nationally were invited to participate. RESULTS: Sixteen general surgery training programs elected to participate, and the survey achieved a response rate of 30%. 48.9% of respondents reported experiencing sexual harassment. The most common location for harassment was in the operating room (OR) (74% of harassed respondents). The second most common location for harassment was the wards (67.4% of harassed respondents). In the OR, attendings and nurses were the most common harassers. The most common harassment in the OR was being called a sexist slur or intimate nickname. DISCUSSION: Surgical trainees report that the OR was the most common location for trainee harassment. Given that harassment is most commonly perpetrated by both attendings and nurses, harassment in surgical training may not entirely be due to hierarchies but may also be attributed to a flawed and permissive OR culture. Surgical training programs should vigilantly eliminate the circumstances that permit sexual harassment in the OR.