RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Staple line bleeding control (SLBC) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a serious problem. Cauterization alone is generally not preferred because of concerns about weakening the staple line. The aim of this study was to compare the suturing and monopolar cauterization methods for SLBC in LSG. METHODS: 212 patients were divided into two groups as cautery and suture groups. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative, and post-operative results were analyzed. RESULTS: Post-operative complications were seen in seven patients, four of them staple line bleeding (three patients were in the cautery group and one patient was in the suture group), and three of them leakage (all patients were in the suture group) from the staple line. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of staple line bleeding (p = 0.35), staple line leakage (p = 0.09), blood loss (p = 0.12), intraoperative complications (p = 0.16), post-operative hemoglobin decrease (p = 0.63), and length of hospital stay (p = 0.35), but the operation time was longer in the suture group. CONCLUSION: This is the first study in literature comparing monopolar cauterization with another technique. Monopolar cauterization can be used for SLBC in LSG. It is a safe and efficient method as well as inexpensive.
OBJETIVO: El control del sangrado de la línea de grapas (SLBC) después de la gastrectomía en manga laparoscópica(LSG) es un problema grave. Generalmente, no se prefiere la cauterización sola debido a preocupaciones sobre el debilitamiento de la línea de grapas. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los métodos de sutura y cauterización monopolar para SLBC en LSG. MÉTODOS: 212 pacientes fueron divididos en 2 grupos de cauterización y sutura. Se analizaron las características demográficas, los resultados intraoperatorios y posoperatorios. RESULTADOS: Se observaron complicaciones posoperatorias en siete pacientes, cuatro de ellos sangrado en la línea de grapas (tres pacientes estaban en el grupo de cauterización, un paciente en el grupo de sutura) y tres de ellos fuga (todos los pacientes estaban en el grupo de sutura) del línea de grapas. No hubo diferencia significativa entre los grupos en términos de sangrado de la línea de grapas (p = 0.35), fuga dela línea de grapas (p = 0.09), pérdida de sangre (p = 0.12), complicaciones intraoperatorias (p = 0.16), disminución de hemoglobina postoperatoria (p = 0.63), duración dela estancia hospitalaria (p = 0.35), pero el tiempo de operación fue mayor en el grupo de sutura. CONCLUSIÓN: Este es el primer estudio que compara la cauterización monopolar con otra técnica. La cauterización monopolar se puede utilizar para SLBC en LSG. Es un método seguro, eficaz y económico.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Cauterización , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Grapado Quirúrgico/métodos , Suturas/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We aimed to discuss the weight loss success of the revision of RYGB to sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Between January 2019 and June 2020, four patients' files were analyzed retrospectively. Post-RYGB mean minimal BMI was 27.4 ± 9.47 kg/m², before SG the mean BMI was 43.41 ± 4.16 kg/m2. Post-operative gastric fistula developed in two patients. The mean follow-up time after revision surgery was 17.25 ± 6.89 months, mean excess weight loss (EWL) was 74.77 ± 8.94%, and mean BMI was 32.65 ± 2.9 kg/m2. Despite high rate of major complications, revision of RYGB to SG is successful in weight loss and resolving certain complications of RYGB.
Nuestro objetivo era discutir el éxito en la pérdida de peso de la revisión de BGYR a gastrectomía en manga (SG). Entre enero de 2019 y junio de 2020, se analizaron retrospectivamente los archivos de cuatro pacientes. El IMC mínimo medio post BGYR fue 27.4 ± 9.47 kg/m², antes de SG el IMC medio fue 43.41 ± 4.16 kg/m2. En dos pacientes se desarrolló una fístula gástrica posoperatoria. El tiempo medio de seguimiento después de la cirugía de revisión fue de 17.25 ± 6.89 meses, la pérdida media de exceso de peso (PEP) fue de 74.77 ± 8.94% y el IMC medio fue de 32.65 ± 2.9 kg/m2. A pesar de la alta tasa de complicaciones mayores, la revisión de BGYR a SG tiene éxito en la pérdida de peso y la resolución de ciertas complicaciones de BGYR.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Postoperative intraabdominal adhesions are obvious cause of postoperative morbidity. In this experimental study, our aim is to compare the effects of 4% icodextrin produced for adhesion prevention, magnesium sulfate used as an anticonvulsant in obstetrics and also as a thickening lubricant in the detergent industry, and saline, which we use most frequently in abdominal irrigation, on adhesion formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 4 groups were formed, 8 in the control group (K), 8 in the icodextrin group (I), 8 in the magnesium sulfate group (M), and 8 in the saline group (SF). Adhesions were quantitatively evaluated with the classification defined by Nair and microscopic grading defined by Zuhlke. RESULTS: The macroscopic staging degree was statistically significantly lower in Group M, I, and SF compared to Group K. Again, the degree of microscopic staging was significantly lower in Group M and I compared to Group K. CONCLUSIONS: Three different materials were used in our study. It was observed that they significantly reduced adhesions. This study once again demonstrates the limited ability of these materials to prevent adhesion, despite the wide variety of materials used, and the need for careful adherence to tissue-respectful surgical techniques.
OBJETIVO: As aderências intra-abdominais pós-operatórias (PIA) são causa óbvia de morbidade pós-operatória. Neste estudo experimental, nosso objetivo é comparar os efeitos da icodextrina 4% produzida para prevenção de aderências, sulfato de magnésio usado como anticonvulsivante em obstetrícia e também como lubrificante espessante na indústria de detergentes e soro fisiológico, que usamos mais frequentemente em abdominais irrigação, na formação de aderências. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram formados 4 grupos, 8 no grupo controle (K), 8 no grupo da icodextrina (I), 8 no grupo sulfato de magnésio (M) e 8 no grupo solução salina (SF). As aderências foram avaliadas quantitativamente com a classificação definida por Nair e graduação microscópica definida por Zuhlke. RESULTADOS: O grau de estadiamento macroscópico foi estatisticamente significativamente menor no Grupo M, I e SF em comparação com o Grupo K. Novamente, o grau de estadiamento microscópico foi significativamente menor nos Grupos M e I em comparação com o Grupo K. CONCLUSÕES: Três materiais diferentes foram usados em nosso estudo. Foi observado que eles reduziram significativamente as aderências. Este estudo demonstra mais uma vez a capacidade limitada desses materiais em prevenir a adesão, apesar da grande variedade de materiais usados, e a necessidade de uma adesão cuidadosa a técnicas cirúrgicas que respeitem o tecido.