Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 17(5): 517-22, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18404621

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess knowledge, extent of reporting and factors influencing reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by resident doctors. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Study site was the University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan, an 850-bed tertiary care hospital in western Nigeria. It was a cross-sectional survey. Data were collected with a 46-item self-administered questionnaire from 192 clinical physicians. RESULTS: Older aged doctors, senior cadre and doctors in medical faculty were 1.5 times likely to be aware of ADR reporting guidelines. General knowledge on ADR was good while 58.3% of residents knew the burden of ADRs. Most (89.5%) had observed at least one ADR but only 32% had ever reported it. Residents in medical faculty were twice more likely to report ADRs than the surgeons [OR 2.1; 95%CI 1.1, 4.1]. The commonest factors that militate against ADR reporting were lack of knowledge that reporting forms were available (70.9%) and ignorance of reporting procedure (69%). CONCLUSION: Despite high observation and good knowledge of ADR among doctors, the rate of reporting was low. There is need for publicity of activities of the pharmacovigilance unit of the hospital.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Médicos/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios Transversales , Docentes Médicos , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Nigeria , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA