Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Headache Pain ; 7(2): 75-82, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16538424

RESUMEN

This study was planned to investigate the economic impact of headache on Turkish headache sufferers attending a tertiary care outpatient headache clinic.A total of 937 headache patients were included in this study and questioned using a questionnaire for the profile of patients and headache, quality of life of patients and economic impact of headache. The median total direct cost was found to be 88.0 USD and the median total cost was 160.7 USD. The drug treatment cost was the highest item followed by the specialist outpatient care cost. The average lost and inefficient work/school days was 1.5 (0-45) and 8.4 (0-100) days for one year. It was shown that loss of productivity was higher for migraine without aura group when compared with the episodic and chronic tension-type headache groups. The results of this nationwide university hospital based study methshowed that headache, especially migraine, has considerable economic impact on patients.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Cefaleas Primarias/economía , Cefaleas Primarias/epidemiología , Hospitales Universitarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Investigación Biomédica/economía , Estudios Transversales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Turquía/epidemiología
2.
Headache ; 44(8): 786-93, 2004 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15330825

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the comprehensibility, internal consistency, patient-physician reliability, test-retest reliability, and validity of Turkish version of Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire in patients with headache. BACKGROUND: MIDAS questionnaire has been developed by Stewart et al and shown to be reliable and valid to determine the degree of disability caused by migraine. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was designed as a national multicenter study to demonstrate the reliability and validity of Turkish version of MIDAS questionnaire. Patients applying to 17 Neurology Clinics in Turkey were evaluated at the baseline (visit 1), week 4 (visit 2), and week 12 (visit 3) visits in terms of disease severity and comprehensibility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity of MIDAS. Since the severity of the disease has been found to change significantly at visit 2 compared to visit 1, test-retest reliability was assessed using the MIDAS scores of a subgroup of patients whose disease severity remained unchanged (up to +/-3 days difference in the number of days with headache between visits 1 and 2). RESULTS: A total of 306 patients (86.2% female, mean age: 35.0 +/- 9.8 years) were enrolled into the study. A total of 65.7%, 77.5%, 82.0% of patients reported that "they had fully understood the MIDAS questionnaire" in visits 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A highly positive correlation was found between physician and patient and the applied total MIDAS scores in all three visits (Spearman correlation coefficients were R= 0.87, 0.83, and 0.90, respectively, P <.001). Internal consistency of MIDAS was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and was found at acceptable (>0.7) or excellent (>0.8) levels in both patient and physician applied MIDAS scores, respectively. Total MIDAS score showed good test-retest reliability (R= 0.68). Both the number of days with headache and the total MIDAS scores were positively correlated at all visits with correlation coefficients between 0.47 and 0.63. There was also a moderate degree of correlation (R= 0.54) between the total MIDAS score at week 12 and the number of days with headache at visit 2 + visit 3, which quantify headache-related disability over a 3-month period similar to MIDAS questionnaire. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrated that the Turkish translation is equivalent to the English version of MIDAS in terms of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity. Physicians can reliably use the Turkish translation of the MIDAS questionnaire in defining the severity of illness and its treatment strategy when applied as a self-administered report by migraine patients themselves.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/clasificación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Traducciones , Turquía
4.
Int J Neurosci ; 113(4): 447-54, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12856474

RESUMEN

We studied the protective effects of trimetazidine (TMZ) on brain damage by means of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) in rats. The TMZ group did not show any statistically significant difference from the control group with respect to SEPs. However, the percentage of cells with ischaemic cell damage in hippocampal regions was significantly smaller in the TMZ group than the control group. Trimetazidine reduced the number of damaged cells in the cerebral tissue during the ischaemia-reperfusion damage. It was suggested that higher doses of trimetazidine may further reduce the number of cells with ischaemic damage.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales/efectos de los fármacos , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/farmacología , Trimetazidina/farmacología , Animales , Isquemia Encefálica/patología , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Muerte Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Hipocampo/efectos de los fármacos , Hipocampo/patología , Hipocampo/fisiopatología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Vasodilatadores/farmacología
5.
Int J Neurosci ; 113(6): 833-47, 2003 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12775347

RESUMEN

Quantitative analysis of the EEG (q-EEG) in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) showed a decreased beta and an increased theta power at frontotemporal regions. The patients who had higher scores in doubting test (Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive Questionnaire) and more severely ill patients shared similar q-EEG features. The relative theta powers were significantly increased and alpha powers were significantly decreased in these patients, particularly in the frontotemporal region. It was suggested that the q-EEG may be useful in investigating the OCD patients with heterogeneous characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Electroencefalografía/psicología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/fisiopatología , Adulto , Ritmo alfa/psicología , Ritmo beta/psicología , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Lóbulo Frontal/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/clasificación , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Análisis de Regresión , Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología , Ritmo Teta/psicología
6.
Turk Psikiyatri Derg ; 14(4): 263-71, 2003.
Artículo en Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14704928

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The reliability and validity of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia were investigated in a Turkish population over 60 years of age. METHOD: Forty-six male and 34 female demented elderly people classified as demented according to DSM-IV criteria were included in the study. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Clinical Version (SCID-I) was completed for all subjects to establish the diagnosis of major depression. The Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) were used. RESULTS: A high test-retest correlation level (r: 0.93) was obtained for the total scores of the scale. The scale also showed high internal consistency (a: 0.86). The validity analysis of the scale resulted in a significant difference (p<0.001) between the total scores of the group with dementia and depression and the group with dementia but without depression. Two items (9-19) showed a low correlation (r<.30) in the test-retest analysis. On the other hand, two items (6-19) had a low item-total score correlation (r<.30). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the scale is reliable and valid for diagnosing depression in dementia in an elderly Turkish population. We expect that the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia will be a useful instrument in pharmacological investigations and in studies of the phenomenology and course of depressive symptoms in demented patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/normas , Anciano , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA