RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is no widely accepted standard for the classification and treatment of traumatic acromion/scapular spine fracture nonunion due to the scarcity of this condition and the confusion of terminology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched using "scapular fracture" and "acromion fracture" or "scapular spine fracture" as search terms. The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles concerning acromion/scapular spine fracture nonunion that described patient characteristics and presented appropriate images. The exclusion criteria were cases without appropriate images. Citation tracking was conducted to find additional articles and notable full-text articles written in other languages. Fractures were classified using our newly proposed classification system. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (19 men, 10 women) with 29 nonunions were identified. There were four type I, 15 type II, and 10 type III fracture nonunions. Only 11 fractures were isolated. The mean period from initial injury to final diagnosis was 35.2 ± 73.2 months (range 3-360 months) (n = 25). The most frequent cause of delayed diagnosis was conservative treatment for fracture in 11 patients, followed by oversight by the physician in 8. The most common reason for seeking medical advice was shoulder pain. Six patients received conservative therapy, and 23 received operative treatment. Fixation materials included various plates in 15 patients, and tension band wiring in 5. Bone grafting was performed in 16 patients (73%, 16/22). Of the 19 surgically treated patients with adequate follow-up, the outcome was rated excellent in 79%. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated acromion/scapular spine fracture nonunion is rare. Fracture type II and III, arising in the anatomical scapular spine, accounted for 86% of the fractures. Computed tomography is required to prevent fracture oversight. Surgical therapy produces good stable results. However, it is important to select the appropriate surgical fixation method and material after considering the anatomical characteristics of the fracture and stress on the fractured portion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Arm wrestling is a popular sport in which various injuries have occurred, even in children. Purpose: To analyze reported fracture-separation of the medial humeral epicondyle (MHE) caused by arm wrestling to determine its mechanism and provide a current overview. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms "arm wrestling" and "humeral fracture" or "medial humeral epicondyle fracture"; and "sports" and "humeral fracture" or "medial humeral epicondyle fracture," following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles on arm wrestling-induced MHE fracture that described patient characteristics and presented appropriate images. Studies with a lack of appropriate images or detailed description of the injury situation were excluded. The patient characteristics were evaluated, and the ratios of treatment selection and outcomes were evaluated using the chi-square test. Results: Included were 27 studies with a total of 68 patients, all boys with a mean age of 14.6 ± 1.24 years (based on n = 65, with 3 patients excluded from this calculation as no definitive age was provided). Boys aged 14 to 15 years accounted for 72% (49/68) of the cases. Fracture occurred suddenly during arm wrestling in 63 boys, while the other 5 boys experienced antecedent medial elbow pain. The match status at the time of injury, provided for 46 patients, was varied. In 31 boys with known match details, injury occurred when a participant suddenly added more force to change the match status. Eight patients displayed anterior and/or proximal displacement of the MHE fragment. Treatment was nonoperative in 25 patients and operative in 38 patients (n = 63, excluding 5 unknown patients). In 35 patients followed up for ≥3 months (mean, 17.6 ± 12.3 months), outcomes were not significantly different between the operative and nonoperative groups. Conclusion: MHE fracture-separation caused by arm wrestling occurred mostly in boys aged 14 to 15 years regardless of the match status. The likely direct cause is forceful traction of the attached flexor-pronator muscles. A relative mechanical imbalance during adolescence may be an underlying cause. A sudden change from concentric to eccentric contraction of the flexor-pronator muscles increases the likelihood of fracture occurrence.

RESUMEN

Background: Arm wrestling is a popular sport/game that may result in various injuries. The most common arm wrestling injury in adults is humeral shaft fracture. This study aimed to elucidate the current understanding of humeral shaft fracture caused by arm wrestling and propose the possible mechanism. Methods: The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms "arm wrestling" and "humeral fracture" as well as "sports" and "humeral fracture" in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles and notable full-text articles in other languages concerning humeral shaft fracture caused by arm wrestling that described the patients' characteristics and presented adequate images or a detailed description of the fracture to confirm the fracture details. The exclusion criterion was a lack of appropriate images or detailed description of the fracture. Fifty-seven studies were identified. The patients' demographics were evaluated. The details of fractures, primary radial nerve palsy, match status, provided fracture treatment, and outcomes were evaluated using the chi-squared test. The relationship between fracture site and the patient's age was analyzed using Student's t-test. Results: One hundred fifty-three patients, 82% of whom were males aged 15-34 years, were identified. With only a few exceptions, almost all patients were injured in recreational matches. The injured limb was the right arm in 65% of patients (n = 141). The patient's physical characteristics, the opponent's physical characteristics compared with those of the patient, and the match status at the time of injury varied between cases. Among the 46 patients with known match details, all were injured when one of the wrestling opponents suddenly added more force in an attempt to change the match status. The fracture configuration was spiral in all cases, and 48% of fractures had an associated medial butterfly fragment. The fracture site was the distal third or the junction between the distal and middle thirds in 90% of cases. Although primary radial nerve palsy was recognized in 19 of 103 patients (18.4%), all resolved spontaneously. Conclusion: Although humeral shaft fracture caused by arm wrestling occurred mostly in male players aged 15-34 years, this injury may affect any player regardless of the match status, player's and opponent's physical characteristics, and age. The direct cause is torsional force generated by the internal rotators. A sudden change from concentric to eccentric contraction of the internal rotators is likely to cause fracture.

RESUMEN

Background: Although fracture of the coracoid process (CF) used to be considered rare, it is now more commonly encountered due to increased awareness and advances in imaging methods. This review aimed to analyze reported cases of CF to determine its mechanism and appropriate treatment. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched using the terms "scapula fracture" and "coracoid fracture." The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles concerning CF that described patient characteristics with appropriate images. The exclusion criteria included cases without appropriate images and those with physeal injury or nonunion. Citation tracking was conducted to find additional articles and notable full-text articles in other languages. Fractures were mainly classified using Ogawa's classification. Results: Ninety-seven studies were identified, including 197 patients (131 men, 33 women; average age 37.0±16.9 years). CF was classified as type I in 77%, type II in 19%, and avulsion fracture at the angle in 5%. Concurrent shoulder girdle injuries included acromioclavicular injury in 33%, clavicular fracture in 17%, acromion or lateral scapular spine fracture in 15%, and anterior shoulder instability in 11%. Among patients with type I CF, 69% had multiple disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex. Conservative treatment was applied in 71% of isolated type I CF, while surgical treatment was applied in 76% of type I CF with multiple disruptions. Although the evaluation methods varied, 60% of patients were followed up for more than 6 months, and the outcomes were generally satisfactory for both conservative and surgical treatments. Conclusion: CF occurred commonly in the age group with higher social activity. The most common fracture type was type I. The possible mechanism of CF is violent traction of the attached muscles, except for avulsion fracture at the angle. Type I CF with multiple disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex requires surgical treatment, whereas conservative care is recommended for isolated type I and type II CFs.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although the coracoid process seems to play an important anatomical role, there are few reports concerning fracture nonunion of the coracoid process (CN) and its disorders. Therefore, there is no widely accepted standard for the treatment of CN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched using "scapular fracture" and "coracoid fracture" as search terms. The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles concerning coracoid fracture, and articles that described patient characteristics and presented appropriate images. The exclusion criteria were descriptive cases, and cases without appropriate images. Citation tracking was conducted to find additional articles and notable full-text articles written in other languages. Fractures were classified using Ogawa's functional classification, with Eyres' anatomical classification used as a supplement when necessary. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (26 men, 3 women) with 30 CN were identified. Nine CN had a predisposing factor such as seizure disorder and renal osteodystrophy. The fracture types were 12 Ogawa type I and 18 type II. Concurrent shoulder girdle injuries at the time of initial trauma/accident were varied. There were six cases of double disruption and two of triple disruption of the superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC), all of which had Ogawa type I fracture. Only six CN were isolated. The most frequent cause of CN was oversight by the previous physician (n = 11), followed by conservative treatment (n = 7). Although 12 patients with 13 CN had symptoms attributable to CN, most of these symptoms were insignificant. Although the acromioclavicular dislocation or CN persisted in eight patients, these residual abnormalities did not significantly affect the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians treating CN should recognize that CN itself is frequently asymptomatic, and a satisfactory outcome is achieved solely by treating the concurrent injuries, even if CN remains. When CN is suspected to produce symptoms, the physician must then determine the mechanism by which the symptoms are produced, and select a treatment strategy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Synovial chondromatosis occurs rarely in the shoulder, and its details remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical results of surgical resection and the histopathological findings of synovial chondromatosis in the shoulder. METHODS: Ten shoulders with synovial chondromatosis that had been operatively resected were reviewed retrospectively. Osteochondral lesions were present in the glenohumeral joint in six shoulders and in the subacromial space in four shoulders. Two patients had a history of trauma with glenohumeral dislocation without recurrent instability, and the other seven patients (eight shoulders) did not have any traumatic episodes or past illness involving the ipsilateral shoulder girdle. The occurrences of osteochondral lesions, inferior humeral osteophytes, and acromial spurs were assessed on radiographs before resection, just after resection, and at final follow-up. The Constant scores were compared before resection and at final follow-up with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Resected lesions were histopathologically differentiated between primary and secondary synovial chondromatosis. RESULTS: Inferior humeral osteophytes were found in five shoulders with synovial chondromatosis in the glenohumeral joint, and all four shoulders with synovial chondromatosis in the subacromial space had acromial spur formation. Osteochondral lesions appeared to have been successfully removed in all shoulders on postoperative radiographs. At the final follow-up, however, one shoulder with secondary synovial chondromatosis in the subacromial space showed recurrence of osteochondral lesions and acromial spur formation. The mean Constant score improved significantly from 53.0 points before resection to 76.0 points at a mean follow-up of 6.0 years (p = 0.002). On histopathological evaluation, one shoulder was diagnosed as having primary synovial chondromatosis, while nine shoulders had secondary synovial chondromatosis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that resection of shoulder osteochondral lesions successfully relieved the clinical symptoms and that primary synovial chondromatosis is less common than secondary synovial chondromatosis in the shoulder. Although most of the present osteochondral lesions were clinically determined to be primary chondromatosis, only one case was histopathologically categorized as primary synovial chondromatosis. These results suggest that histopathological identification is needed to differentiate between primary and secondary synovial chondromatosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physeal injuries of the coracoid process are rare but may be increasing because of increased participation of youth in year-round sports. PURPOSE: To analyze reported physeal and apophyseal injuries of the coracoid process. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched using the terms scapula fracture and coracoid fracture. The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles describing coracoid fracture as well as articles that described patient characteristics and presented appropriate images. The exclusion criteria were descriptive cases without images as well as those lacking appropriate images. Citation tracking was conducted to find additional articles and full-text articles written in other languages. Articles were included if they reported physeal injury or judged to involve physeal injury based on the provided images. RESULTS: Overall, 22 studies including 32 patients (29 males, 3 females) were identified. All but 2 patients were younger than 18 years of age, and 66% (21/32) had sustained injuries during or as a result of participation in sporting activities. The affected site was the physis at the base in 18 patients, an intra-articular fracture in the primary coracoid ossification center combined with the subcoracoid ossification center to form an intra-articular fracture in 5, the apophysis of the tip in 3, the apophysis of the angle in 5, and uncertain in 1. Eleven patients had concurrent acromioclavicular injuries. The injury was acute in 23 patients, chronic in 6, and traumatic nonunion in 3. Among 21 cases in which treatment methods and outcomes were described, 21% of the acute cases (4/19), and 2 of the 3 nonunions were surgically treated. Only 1 study used a widely accepted evaluation method. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 weeks to 2 years. Outcomes were generally excellent for nonoperative and operative treatment and without any serious complications. CONCLUSION: Coracoid physeal injuries occurred most commonly in patients aged 13 to 15 years of age (71%) and were usually sustained during or as a result of sports activities (66%). The most common injury site was the physis at its base. The cause of these injuries is probably severe or repeated traction of the attached muscles and ligaments. The majority of these injuries can be successfully treated nonoperatively.

RESUMEN

Isolated fracture of the inferior scapular angle is extremely rare. We present the case of a 20-year-old female with persistent periscapular pain and a winged scapula caused by delayed union of an inferior scapular angle (ISA) fracture. Ten months previously, the patient had a car accident while seated in the left rear passenger seat. The patient visited an orthopedic clinic where a surgeon diagnosed left shoulder contusion without any abnormal radiographic findings. The left arm was kept in a sling for 2 months, as left arm elevation caused severe pain in the upper back. After sling removal, the dull pain around the left scapula continued. The patient presented at our clinic because her mother had noticed the deformity of her back. Radiographs showed a small bony fragment in the ventral side of the ISA. Computed tomography revealed a narrow gap between the ISA and the fragment. The patient's symptoms resolved with conservative treatment that consisted of relative rest for 2 months and subsequent reinforcement exercises of the serratus anterior for 2 months.

RESUMEN

Osteochondroma (OC) is the most common benign bone tumor and may occur on any bone in which endochondral ossification develops. Although scapular OC accounts for less than 5% of the cases of solitary OC, OC is the most common lesion among the tumors and tumor-like lesions of the scapula. OC that develops near the medial scapular border easily causes friction with the ribcage; hence, almost half the number of cases of OC associated with marked bursa formation develops in the ventral scapula. We report a case of a 27-year-old female with a painful OC of the ventral scapular surface associated with large bursa formation and pseudowinging of the scapula. After l2 years of follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging, we confirm that the accompanied bursa left at surgery disappears.

RESUMEN

Avulsion fracture at the site of attachment of the coracoid process of the coracoclavicular ligament (CCL) is extremely rare. We presented three adult cases of this unusual avulsion fracture associated with other injuries. Case 1 was a 25-year-old right-handed male with a left distal clavicular fracture with an avulsion fracture of the coracoid attachment of the CCL; this case was treated surgically and achieved an excellent outcome. Case 2 was a 39-year-old right-handed male with dislocation of the left acromioclavicular joint with two avulsion fractures: one at the posteromedial surface of the coracoid process at the attachment of the conoid ligament and one at the inferior surface of the clavicle at the attachment site of the trapezoid ligament; this case was treated conservatively, and unfavorable symptoms such as dull pain at rest and sharp pain during some daily activities remained. Case 3 was a 41-year-old right-handed female with a right distal clavicular fracture with an avulsion fracture of the coracoid attachment of the conoid ligament; this case was treated conservatively, and the distal clavicular fracture became typical nonunion. These three cases corresponded to type I fractures according to Ogawa's classification as the firm scapuloclavicular connection was destroyed and also to double disruption of the superior shoulder suspensory complex. We recommend surgical intervention when treating patients with this type of acute or subacute injury, especially in those engaging in heavy lifting or overhead work.

RESUMEN

The case of a 29-year-old man who had osteochondritis dissecans on the medial aspect of the humeral head is reported. Repetitive micro-trauma at a low elevated arm position was thought to have induced the osteochondral lesion.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An understanding of normal glenohumeral geometry is important for anatomical reconstruction in shoulder arthroplasty. Unfortunately, the details of the glenohumeral joint in Asian populations have not been sufficiently evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional geometry of the glenohumeral joint in the normal Japanese population and to clarify its morphologic features. METHODS: Anthropometric analysis of the glenohumeral joint was performed using computed tomography scans of 160 normal shoulders from healthy Japanese volunteers. The glenohumeral dimensions and orientation were analyzed 3-dimensionally. Sex differences and correlations between sides and among the respective parameters in the glenohumeral dimensions were evaluated. RESULTS: The normal Japanese humeral head has an average width of 41.4 mm, thickness of 13.2 mm, diameter of 42.9 mm, retroversion of 32°, and inclination of 135°. The glenoid has an average height of 31.5 mm, width of 23.1 mm, diameter of 62.0 mm, retroversion of 0°, and inferior inclination of 2°. The values of the glenohumeral dimensions were uniform in men and women, and the humeral head and glenoid were larger in men than in women. The glenohumeral size was well correlated between the 2 sides, and there were direct correlations among the heights, humeral length, humeral head size, and glenoid size. CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed the glenohumeral geometry in the normal Japanese population. The present results would be useful to determine the size of implants and to improve the design of shoulder prostheses that reflect the normal anatomy of the Asian glenohumeral joint.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The morphologic features and clinical significance of version of the humeral head and glenoid remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the normal values of humeral head version and glenoid version on computed tomography scans and to clarify their features in the normal glenohumeral joint. METHODS: Images for analysis were computed tomography scans of 410 normal shoulders from healthy volunteers. Values of humeral head and glenoid version were measured. In glenoid version measurement, 3-dimensionally corrected slices were reconstructed to eliminate scapular inclination. Differences in humeral head version and glenoid version were assessed between dominant and nondominant shoulders and between men and women. Correlation analyses were also performed in the values of version between dominant and nondominant shoulders and between humeral head version and glenoid version. RESULTS: The values of humeral head retroversion were widely distributed from -2° to 60°, with an average of 26° ± 11°. Average glenoid retroversion was 1° ± 3°, ranging from -9° to 13°. Both humeral head retroversion and glenoid retroversion were significantly higher on the dominant side than on the nondominant side and significantly higher in men than in women. Humeral head version and glenoid version values were well correlated with those of the contralateral shoulder. No correlation was found between humeral head version and glenoid version. CONCLUSIONS: This study found differences in humeral head version and glenoid version by sex and shoulder dominance in a large sample. Both the humeral head and glenoid are thought to be more retroverted in high-demand shoulders.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Here, we describe a modified osteotomy for malunion of the greater tuberosity that facilitates bone union and prevents symptom recurrence. The 3 most important features of this technique are: (1) osteotomizing the displaced fragment that includes the bed of the fracture, (2) placing figure-of-eight sutures by passing suture threads from inside the medullary cavity through osseous holes made in the metaphysis, and (3) pushing the distal end of the osteotomized fragment into the medullary cavity and fixing it in place. This procedure was performed on 10 patients who complained of clinical symptoms derived primarily from greater tuberosity malunion after fractures of various morphologies. Eight of these patients were available for follow-up examinations over 2 postoperative years. Constant score ratios comparing the repaired side to the uninjured side ranged from 82% to 100%. These results support the use of this modified osteotomy in achieving favorable bone union and in creating sufficient subacromial space to resolve most symptoms caused by these malunited proximal humeral fractures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The conventional measuring method for glenoid version is greatly influenced by the scapular body shape that varies widely between patients. We postulated that the glenoid vault version could be more useful than the conventional glenoid version in clinical cases. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to compare the values of glenoid version measured with the conventional method to those with the vault method and to investigate the feasibility of the glenoid vault version. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 150 normal shoulders and 150 arthritic shoulders were analyzed. Three-dimensionally corrected slices were reconstructed from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data, and glenoid version was measured with both the conventional and vault methods. After determining intra- and interrater reliabilities, differences in glenoid version values between the conventional and vault methods were assessed. In the normal shoulder group, side-to-side differences of glenoid version values were also evaluated in both methods. RESULTS: Both measuring methods demonstrated high intra- and interrater reliabilities. The normal glenoid had 1.1° ± 3.2° retroversion with the conventional method and 8.9° ± 2.7° retroversion with the vault method. The average glenoid retroversion of arthritic shoulders was 10.8° ± 9.3° measured with the conventional method and 18.2° ± 9.1° with the vault method. The vault method showed significantly larger glenoid retroversion than the conventional method in both normal and arthritic shoulder groups. Both conventional glenoid retroversion and glenoid vault retroversion were significantly larger on dominant sides than on nondominant sides in the normal shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: The glenoid vault version could be used as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version with high reliability. In clinical use, the glenoid vault version appears to be more useful than the conventional glenoid version to assess the severity of arthritis and difficulty of glenoid replacement. The glenoid vault is not symmetric, but usually retroverted in both normal and arthritic shoulders.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Two percent of scapular fractures occur as a result of indirect trauma caused by traction of the muscles and ligaments attached to the scapula. We present two cases involving adults with incomplete avulsion fractures of the scapular spine caused by violent voluntary contraction of the deltoid muscle. These cases are the first reported avulsion fractures confined to the scapular spine medial to the spinoglenoid notch. Although the fractures were incomplete, one patient had a typical symptom of scapular fracture - pseudo-rupture of the rotator cuff characterized by clinical signs of a complete rupture of the musculotendinous cuff. Although this symptom is generally thought to be caused by massive hemorrhaging under the rotator-cuff muscle bellies, it may develop from modest bleeding through the formation of an intramuscular hematoma and a resultant elevation in intramuscular pressure. Confirming the presence of tenderness on the scapular spine and performing appropriate imaging investigation constitute a clinically effective method for preventing misdiagnosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The majority of type I coracoid fractures set out in Ogawa's classification constitute double disruption of the superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC) as proposed by Goss, frequently resulting in healing delay and adverse functional consequences.However, there are few reports alluding to strategies or concrete treatment methods of such injuries. The purpose of this report is to introduce our surgical strategy for treating the type I coracoid fracture with concurrent injuries and to describe our treatment method with their outcomes. METHODS: Thirty-six patients, who had acute type I coracoid fractures surgically treated and were followed up for 1 year or longer, constituted the present study population. Reduction and stabilization were undertaken beginning with the most medial unstable injury of SSSC and proceeding to the lateral ones. The respective coracoid fractures were finally reduced and fixed. In the follow-up, patients were directly examined and evaluated using the ratios of the Constant score for the injured side to that for the normal side. RESULTS: There were a total of 80 ipsilateral injuries of SSSC, including the coracoid fractures, and double disruption accounted for 94%of the patients. Of these, 62 injuries were surgically treated. No complications associated with surgery were observed. Bone union was achieved in all fractures; no patients required an additional operation. The Constant score ratio at the follow-up was 93% ± 7.4% on average. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of cases with type I coracoid fractures suffered double disruptions of SSSC, satisfactory results have been obtained with surgical treatment focusing on the assured reconstruction of a firm scapuloclavicular union.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The "palm tree-like wiring" introduced by Kapandji and its modifications for proximal humeral fractures should be given the generic name "retrograde intramedullary multiple pinning through the deltoid 'V'" (IMPV). IMPV is still preferable for treating valgus-impacted four-part fractures in which K-wires have the advantage of working as an internal fixation material as well as a tool in fracture reduction. METHODS: Three 2.4-mm K-wires formed into the desired shape are used as the intramedullary pins and a 3.0- to 3.2-mm upwardly angled hole for each wire is opened in the deltoid "V." After the tips of two wires are introduced into the lateral aspect of the head, the valgus deformity of the head is gradually corrected by alternately tapping the two wires under fluoroscopy. When the head and metaphysis are strongly compressed together, open reduction is attempted. If required, the tuberosity fragments are surgically reduced and stabilized. We performed IMPV on one C2.1 fracture and nine C2.2 fractures with 1 year or more follow-up. RESULTS: No nonunion was observed, but avascular head necrosis with collapse was observed in two C2.2 fractures, of which constant score ratios to the normal side were 55% and 64%, respectively. The constant score ratios of the other eight patients were 92% ± 8% (70-96%). CONCLUSIONS: IMPV is considered to be a preferable reducing and stabilizing method for valgus-impacted four-part fractures regardless of patient age. Additionally beneficial is being able to use the intramedullary pins as a tool for bone fragment reduction.

Asunto(s)