RESUMEN
Purpose: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis with the intention of evaluating the reliability and test accuracy of the aMAP risk score in the identification of HCC. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2023, to identify studies measuring the aMAP score in patients for the purpose of predicting the occurrence or recurrence of HCC. The meta-analysis was performed using the meta package in R version 4.1.0. The diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis was conducted using Meta-DiSc software. Results: Thirty-five studies 102,959 participants were included in the review. The aMAP score was significantly higher in the HCC group than in the non-HCC group, with a mean difference of 6.15. When the aMAP score is at 50, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, and positive likelihood ratio with 95% CI was 0.961 (95% CI 0.936, 0.976), 0.344 (95% CI 0.227, 0.483), 0.114 (95% CI 0.087, 0.15), and 1.464 (95% CI 1.22, 1.756), respectively. At a cutoff value of 60, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, and positive likelihood ratio with 95% CI was 0.594 (95% CI 0.492, 0.689), 0.816 (95% CI 0.714, 0.888), 0.497 (95% CI 0.418, 0.591), and 3.235 (95% CI 2.284, 4.582), respectively. Conclusion: The aMAP score is a reliable, accurate, and easy-to-use tool for predicting HCC patients of all stages, including early-stage HCC. Therefore, the aMAP score can be a valuable tool for surveillance of HCC patients and can help to improve early detection and reduce mortality.
RESUMEN
Introduction: The Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine has a beneficial "off-target" effect that offers heterologous protection against respiratory tract infections by inducing trained immunity. The need for producing antigen-specific COVID-19 vaccines leads to delays in vaccine administration. Current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report conflicting data on BCG's efficacy in COVID-19 infection. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using major bibliographic databases to identify RCTs evaluating the outcomes of BCG re-vaccination in COVID-19. For dichotomous outcomes, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Statistical significance was set at P less than 0.05. Results: Thirteen RCTs with 13 939 participants (7004 in the BCG re-vaccination group and 6935 in the placebo group) were included. BCG re-vaccination did not lead to a statistically significant difference in the incidence of COVID-19 infection [OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.19; P=0.56], COVID-19-related hospitalizations [OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.38, 1.72; P=0.58), ICU admissions [OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.13, 1.46; P=0.18], or mortality [OR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.15, 3.04; P=0.60]. For safety outcomes, BCG re-vaccination led to a significant increase in the local injection site complications [OR: 99.79; 95% CI: 31.04, 320.80; P<0.00001], however, the risk of serious adverse events was similar [OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.67; P=0.33]. Conclusions: BCG re-vaccination does not decrease the incidence of COVID-19 infection, COVID-19-related hospitalizations, ICU admissions, COVID-19-related mortality, and serious adverse events; however, it leads to a rise in local injection site complications. Caution should be exercised when overstating BCG's efficacy in COVID-19 prevention.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is estimated to affect approximately 25% of the global population. Both, coronary artery disease and NAFLD are linked to underlying insulin resistance and inflammation as drivers of the disease. Coronary flow reserve parameters, including coronary flow reserve velocity (CFRV), baseline diastolic peak flow velocity (DPFV), and hyperemic DPFV, are noninvasive markers of coronary microvascular circulation. The existing literature contains conflicting findings regarding these parameters in NAFLD patients. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted on major electronic databases from inception until May 8, 2024, to identify relevant studies. We pooled the standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the inverse-variance random-effects model. Statistical significance was set at Pâ <â .05. RESULTS: Four studies with 1139 participants (226 with NAFLD and 913 as controls) were included. NAFLD was associated with a significantly lower CFRV (SMD: -0.77; 95% CI: -1.19, -0.36; Pâ <â .0002) and hyperemic DPFV (SMD: -0.73; 95% CI: -1.03, -0.44; Pâ <â .00001) than the controls. NAFLD demonstrated a statistically insignificant trend toward a reduction in baseline DPFV (SMD: -0.09; 95% CI: -0.38, 0.19; Pâ =â .52) compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Patients with NAFLD are at a higher risk of coronary microvascular dysfunction, as demonstrated by reduced CFRV and hyperemic DPFV. The presence of abnormal coronary flow reserve in patients with NAFLD provides insights into the higher rates of cardiovascular disease in these patients. Early aggressive targeted interventions for impaired coronary flow reserve in subjects with NAFLD may lead to improvement in clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/fisiopatología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Circulación Coronaria/fisiología , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico/fisiología , Proyectos Piloto , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo/fisiología , Microcirculación/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and its severe complication, chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Conventionally, balloon angioplasty has been regarded as superior to stenting in CLTI associated with infrapopliteal PAD. Stenting is often considered a "rescue" or "bail-out" procedure in managing CLTI. However, stenting using newer generation stents coated with antiproliferative drugs such as paclitaxel has demonstrated noninferior results compared with balloon angioplasty in terms of risk of restenosis. However, the current data comparing stenting to balloon angioplasty for other outcomes is rather inconsistent. Major bibliographic databases were searched systematically to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing stenting to balloon angioplasty in CLTI in infrapopliteal PAD patients. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled in a random-effects model with statistical significance considered at P < 0.05. 9 RCTs with 1125 patients (634, stenting; 491, balloon angioplasty) were included. Stenting was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of binary restenosis (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97; P = 0.04] compared with balloon angioplasty. However, no statistically significant difference in technical success, all-cause mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, major limb amputation, and primary patency was observed between the 2 groups. In infrapopliteal PAD associated with CLTI, stenting is noninferior to balloon angioplasty. Future large multicentric RCTs are warranted, particularly evaluating the newer generation drug-eluting stents, in a diverse patient population with longer follow-up periods to corroborate the results of this meta-analysis.
RESUMEN
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a commonly performed procedure, however, post-ablation AF recurrence is often observed due to inflammation and oxidative stress. Colchicine is a potent anti-inflammatory agent with conflicting efficacy in preventing post-ablation AF recurrence. A comprehensive literature search of the major bibliographic databases was conducted to retrieve studies comparing colchicine use versus placebo in AF patients post-ablation. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Six studies were included with 1791 patients (721 in the colchicine group and 1070 in the placebo group). Patients who received colchicine had significantly lower odds of AF recurrence on follow-up (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79; P = 0.0001) but had higher gastrointestinal side effects (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.00-7.12; P = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in acute pericarditis (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.27-1.05; P = 0.07) or hospitalization (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.73-1.45; P = 0.87). Prophylactic use of colchicine after catheter ablation in patients with AF leads to a reduction in AF recurrence, albeit with increased gastrointestinal side effects. Colchicine use did not lead to a reduction in the rates of pericarditis and hospitalization after ablation. Large randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of colchicine in preventing AF recurrence, particularly focusing on the dose and duration of treatment to optimize the side effect profile.
RESUMEN
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a prevalent condition associated with chronic noninfectious inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. It has been hypothesized that chronic inflammation can predispose patients to atrial fibrillation (AF), however, no clear evidence exists to support this. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using major databases aimed at studies focusing on AF development in patients with IBD. Further subgroup analyses were performed for ulcerative colitis (UC) and crohn's disease (CD). Risk ratios (RR) with their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model in the Review Manager Software. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Seven studies with 88,893,407 patients were included (1,002,719 and 87, 890, 688 patients in the IBD and non-IBD groups, respectively). IBD patients were at an increased risk of developing AF [RR: 1.52; 95 % CI: 1.19-1.95; p = 0.0009] compared to the non-IBD group. In subgroup analyses, patients with UC were at an increased risk of developing AF [RR: 1.29; 95 % CI: 1.08-1.53; p = 0.004], as were CD patients [RR: 1.30; 95 % CI: 1.07-1.58; p = 0.008] compared to the non-UC and non-CD groups, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with IBD are at nearly 1.5 times the risk of developing AF compared to the non-IBD population. Our meta-analysis was limited by heterogeneity among the studies, highlighting the importance of further large-scale prospective studies to establish more robust evidence.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common post-procedural complication of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Anisodamine hydrobromide is an alkaloid that has demonstrated efficacy in improving microcirculation. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the reno-protective effects of Anisodamine in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception to January 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of Anisodamine in preventing the development of CIN. Outcomes of interest included the incidence of CIN, serum creatinine levels, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A random-effects model was used for pooling standard mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% CI. Statistical significance was considered at a P less than 0.05. Results: Three RCTs involving 563 patients were included. Anisodamine was associated with a reduction in the incidence of CIN [OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.69; P=0.0003], a reduction in serum creatinine levels at 48 [SMD: -6.78; 95% CI: -10.54,-3.02; P=0.0004] and 72 h [SMD: -6.74; 95% CI: -13.33,-0.15; P=0.03], and a higher eGFR at 24 [SMD: 5.77; 95% CI: 0.39, 11.14; P=0.03], and 48 h [SMD: 4.70; 95% CI: 2.03,7.38; P=0.0006]. The levels of serum creatinine at 24 h and eGFR value at 72 h were comparable between both groups. Conclusions: Anisodamine has demonstrated clinical efficacy in ameliorating the development of CIN post-PCI in AMI patients. Large, multi-centric RCTs are warranted to evaluate the robustness of these findings.
RESUMEN
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a subtype of pulmonary hypertension characterized by organized thrombi inside the pulmonary vasculature, leading to an increase in pulmonary artery pressure. CTEPH is seen in about 3-4% of patients with acute pulmonary embolism and is associated with poor outcomes. Apart from surgical intervention, lifelong anticoagulation is the mainstay of CTEPH management. Traditionally, CTEPH is managed with vitamin-K antagonists (VKA); however, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recently gaining popularity. However, the current literature comparing DOACs versus VKAs in CTEPH has inconsistent results. An electronic search of the major bibliographic databases was performed to retrieve studies comparing DOACs versus VKAs in CTEPH patients. For dichotomous outcomes, the odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to generate forest plots. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. Ten studies were included with 3936 patients (1269 in the DOAC group and 2667 in the VKA group). Treatment with DOAC was associated with no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.35-1.71; P < 0.53), venous thromboembolism (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.59-2.40; P = 0.63), major bleeding (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.38-1.22; P = 0.20), and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.80-1.86; P = 0.37). Our analysis demonstrates that DOACs are noninferior to VKAs in terms of their safety and outcomes profile in CTEPH. Further trials are needed to evaluate more robust evidence and to compare additional outcomes.
RESUMEN
Sudden cardiac death/sudden cardiac arrest (SCD/SCA) is an increasingly prevalent cause of mortality globally, particularly in individuals with preexisting cardiac conditions. The ambiguous premortem warnings and the restricted interventional window related to SCD account for the complexity of the condition. Current reports suggest SCD to be accountable for 20% of all deaths hence accurately predicting SCD risk is an imminent concern. Traditional approaches for predicting SCA, particularly "track-and-trigger" warning systems have demonstrated considerable inadequacies, including low sensitivity, false alarms, decreased diagnostic liability, reliance on clinician involvement, and human errors. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models have demonstrated near-perfect accuracy in predicting SCA risk, allowing clinicians to intervene timely. Given the constraints of current diagnostics, exploring the benefits of AI and ML models in enhancing outcomes for SCA/SCD is imperative. This review article aims to investigate the efficacy of AI and ML models in predicting and managing SCD, particularly targeting accuracy in prediction.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) and cholangiocarcinoma are aggressive forms of cancer developed in the gallbladder and biliary tracts which are related to the liver. This systematic review aimed to highlight the significant association between gallbladder, biliary cancers, and arsenic exposure. METHODS: An extensive search was conducted in Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. We included studies that assessed arsenic levels in gallbladder cancer patients, without restrictions on age, sex, or language. Biological samples, such blood, bile, gallbladder tissue, gallstones, and hair were obtained, and arsenic levels were measured. Also, arsenic water and soil concentrations were collected. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in our review. These studies included 2234 non-gallbladder carcinoma patients and 22 585 gallbladder carcinoma cases. The participant demographics showed a gender distribution of 862 males and 1845 females, with an age range of 20-75 years. The average body mass index (BMI) was 19.8 kg/m2 for nongallbladder carcinoma patients and 20.1 kg/m2 for gallbladder carcinoma cases. The selected studies examined arsenic concentrations across various biological samples, including blood, hair, gallstones, and bile. Blood arsenic levels ranged from 0.0002 to 0.3893 µg/g and were significantly associated with increased gallbladder carcinoma risk in several studies. Hair also demonstrated a significant correlation, with arsenic concentrations ranging from 0.0002 to 6.9801 µg/g. CONCLUSION: There is a strong link between arsenic exposure and gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma. Even chronic exposure to low-moderate amounts could lead to gallbladder carcinoma. These findings stress the need for more comprehensive and dedicated studies, to control arsenic water/soil levels and seek other preventive measures for this high mortality disease.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a prevalent inflammatory skin condition characterized by erythematous plaques with scaling. Recent research has demonstrated an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients with psoriasis; however, current evidence on atrial fibrillation (AF) risk in psoriasis is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on major bibliographic databases to retrieve studies that evaluated AF risk in patients with psoriasis. The DerSimonian and Laird random effects model was used to pool the hazard ratios (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analysis was conducted by dividing the patients into mild and severe psoriasis groups. Publication bias was assessed by visual inspection and Egger's regression test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, with 10,974,668 participants (1,94,230 in the psoriasis group and 10,780,439 in the control group). Patients with psoriasis had a significantly higher risk of AF [Pooled HR: 1.28; 95 % CI: 1.20, 1.36; p < 0.00001]. In subgroup analysis, patients with severe psoriasis [HR: 1.32; 95 % CI: 1.23, 1.42; p < 0.00001] demonstrated a slightly higher risk of AF, although statistically insignificant (p = 0.17), than the mild psoriasis group [HR: 1.21; 95 % CI: 1.10, 1.33; p < 0.0001]. Egger's regression test showed no statistically significant publication bias (p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrated that patients with psoriasis are at a significantly higher risk of AF and hence should be closely monitored for AF. Further large-scale and multicenter randomized trials are warranted to validate the robustness of our findings.