RESUMEN

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a rare spectrum of acute, mucocutaneous drug reactions characterized by epidermal necrosis of the skin and mucous membranes with progressive multiorgan failure. Cutaneous presentation of SJS/TEN is similar to that of acute graft-versus-host disease, creating a diagnostic dilemma in solid-organ transplant recipients presenting with diffuse, erythematous eruptions, skin sloughing, and systemic sequelae, reflective of both diseases. This case report details a 48-year-old woman post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) who developed a diffuse, painful, morbilliform rash with progressive desquamation, along with corresponding pathological analysis indicative of SJS/TEN. There are few documented reports of SJS/TEN in solid-organ transplant recipients, and this case illustrates successful intervention and resolution of SJS/TEN in an OLT recipient while managing intraabdominal sepsis and an episode of acute rejection. Despite its rarity, prompt diagnosis of SJS/TEN and the implementation of tailored therapeutic strategies are crucial in the care of solid-organ transplant recipients.

RESUMEN

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts might represent one of the largest untapped sources of liver allografts. Our aim was to identify independent recipient risk factors that predict mortality in DCD allograft recipients to preselect optimal candidates for successful transplantation. Furthermore, we compared the application of our newly constructed DCD Recipient Selector Index (RSI) score to previously developed models to determine superiority in predicting recipient survival. Methods: Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, we performed univariate and multivariate retrospective analyses on 4228 DCD liver allograft recipients. Results: We identified 8 significant factors and incorporated them into the weighted RSI to predict 3-mo survival following DCD liver transplantation with a C-statistic of 0.6971. The most significant recipient risk factors were recipient serum sodium levels >150 mEq/L at transplant, recipient albumin <2.0 g/dL at transplant, and a history of portal vein thrombosis. Because Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score components were included as individual predictors, the DCD RSI predicts survival independently of MELD. Upon comparison with 3 previous recipient risk scores-Balance of Risk, Renal Risk Index, Patient-Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation-the DCD RSI was determined to be superior at selecting optimal candidates pre-DCD transplantation, yielding a C-statistic of 0.6971. Conclusions: After verifying the performance of predictive indices for selection of DCD recipients, the DCD RSI is best used to preselect patients for optimized outcomes after DCD transplantation. This can increase utilization of DCD donors by improving outcomes.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral obstruction following pediatric kidney transplantation occurs in 5-8% of cases. We describe our experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteroplasty for the treatment of ureteral stricture in pediatric kidney transplant patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric kidney transplantation patients who presented with ureteral stricture and underwent percutaneous antegrade ureteroplasty at our institution from July 2009 to July 2021. Variables included patient demographics, timing of presentation, location and extent of stricture, ureteroplasty technique and clinical outcomes. Our primary outcome was persistent obstruction of the kidney transplant. RESULTS: Twelve patients met inclusion criteria (4.2% of all transplants). Median age at time of ureteroplasty was 11.5 years (range: 3-17.5 years). Median time from kidney transplantation to ureteroplasty was 3 months. Patency was maintained in 50% of patients. Seven patients (58.3%) required additional surgery. Four patients developed vesicoureteral reflux. Patients with persistent obstruction had a longer time from transplant to ureteroplasty compared to those who achieved patency (19.3 vs 1.3 months, p = 0.0163). Of those treated within 6 months after transplantation, two patients (25%) required surgery for persistent obstruction (p = 0.06). All patients treated >1 year after transplantation had persistent obstruction following ureteroplasty (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous antegrade ureteroplasty can be considered a viable minimally invasive treatment option for pediatric patients who develop early ureteral obstruction (<6 months) following kidney transplantation. In patients who are successfully treated with ureteroplasty, 67% can develop vesicoureteral reflux into the transplant kidney. Patients who fail early percutaneous ureteroplasty or develop obstruction >1 year after transplantation are best managed with surgical intervention.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Renal vein thrombosis after kidney transplant is a rare but potentially graft-threatening event. As sequelae of this complication can range from brief acute kidney injury to total graft failure, it is necessary to maintain close clinical observation postoperatively. If posttransplant renal vein thrombosis does occur, recanalization may be attempted with mechanical thrombectomy, suction thrombectomy, or explantation and reimplantation of the allograft. This is a novel report of the successful use of suction thrombectomy to treat renal vein thrombosis in a pediatric kidney transplant.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Assessing the survival benefit of transplantation in patients with end-stage liver disease is critical in guiding the decision-making process for liver allocation. Previous studies established increased mortality risk for those transplanted below Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 18 compared with candidates who remained on the waitlist; however, improved outcomes of liver transplantation and a changing landscape in the donor supply warrant re-evaluation of this idea. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we analyzed 160 290 candidates who were waitlisted for liver transplantation within MELD cohorts. We compared patients who were transplanted in a MELD cohort with those listed but not transplanted in that listed MELD cohort with an intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Those transplanted at a MELD between 6 and 11 showed a 31% reduction in adjusted mortality (HR = 0.69 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.75]; P < 0.001) compared with the intent-to-treat cohort in a Cox multivariate regression. This mortality benefit increased to a 37% adjusted reduction for those transplanted at MELD between 12 and 14 (HR = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.60-0.66]; P < 0.001) and a 46% adjusted reduction for those transplanted at a MELD between 15 and 17 (HR = 0.54 [95% CI, 0.52-0.57]; P < 0.001), effects that remained in sensitivity analyses excluding patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, encephalopathy, ascites, and variceal bleeds. A multivariate analysis of patients transplanted at MELD < 18 found younger age and cold ischemia time were protective, whereas older age, lower functional status, and socioeconomic factors increased mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge the current practice of deferring liver transplants below a particular MELD score by demonstrating survival benefits for most transplant patients at the lowest MELD scores and providing insight into who benefits within these subgroups.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Amid a viral pandemic with poorly understood transmissibility and pathogenicity in the pediatric patient, we report the first pediatric liver transplants utilizing allografts from SARS-CoV-2+ donors. METHODS: We describe the outcomes of two pediatric liver transplant recipients who received organs from SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test-positive (NAT+) donors. Data were obtained through the respective electronic medical record system and UNet DonorNet platform. RESULTS: The first donor was a 3-year-old boy succumbing to head trauma. One of four nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and 1 of 3 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) NAT tests demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 infection before organ procurement. The second donor was a 16-month-old boy with cardiopulmonary arrest of unknown etiology. Three NAT tests (2 NP swab/1 BAL) prior to procurement failed to detect SARS-CoV-2. The diagnosis was made when the medical examiner repeated 2 NP swab NATs and an archive plasma NAT, all positive for SARS-CoV-2. Both 2-year-old recipients continue to do well 8 months post-transplant, with excellent graft function and no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to describe successful pediatric liver transplantation from SARS-CoV-2+ donors. These data reinforce the adult transplant experience and support the judicious use of SARS-CoV-2+ donors for liver transplantation in children. With SARS-CoV-2 becoming endemic, the concern for donor-derived viral transmission must now be weighed against the realized benefit of life-saving transplantation in the pediatric population as we continue to work toward donor pool maximization.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation in small children is technically challenging. Consideration of whether to use intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal placement of the graft depends on patient size, clinical history, anatomy, and surgical preference. We report a large single-center experience of intraperitoneal kidney transplantation and their outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation from April 2011 to March 2018 at a single large volume center. We identified those with intraperitoneal placement and assessed their outcomes, including graft and patient survival, rejection episodes, and surgical or non-surgical complications. RESULTS: Forty-six of 168 pediatric kidney transplants (27%) were placed intraperitoneally in children mean age 5.5 ± 2.3 years (range 1.6-10 years) with median body weight 18.2 ± 5 kg (range 11.4-28.6 kg) during the study period. Two patients (4%) had vascular complications; 10 (22%) had urologic complications requiring intervention; all retained graft function. Thirteen patients (28%) had prolonged post-operative ileus. Eight (17%) patients had rejection episodes ≤6 months post-transplant. Only one case resulted in graft loss and was associated with recurrent focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS). Two patients (4%) had chronic rejection and subsequent graft loss by 5-year follow-up. At 7-year follow-up, graft survival was 93% and patient survival was 98%. CONCLUSIONS: The intraperitoneal approach offers access to the great vessels, which allows greater inflow and outflow and more abdominal capacity for an adult donor kidney, which is beneficial in very small patients. Risk of graft failure and surgical complications were not increased when compared to other published data on pediatric kidney transplants.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Despite advancements in diabetic care, diabetic kidney transplant recipients have significantly worse outcomes than non-diabetics. AIM: Our study aims to demonstrate the impact of diabetes, types I and II, on American young adults (18-40 years old) requiring kidney transplantation. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we conducted a population cohort study that included all first-time, kidney-only transplant recipients during 2002-2019, ages 18-40 years old. Patients were grouped according to indication for transplant. Primary outcomes were cumulative all-cause mortality and death-censored graft failure. Death-censored graft failure and patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years were calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression was used to assess for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 42 466 transplant recipients, 3418 (8.1%) had end-stage kidney disease associated with diabetes. At each time-point, cumulative mortality was higher in diabetics compared to patients with non-diabetic causes of renal failure. Conversely, cumulative graft failure was similar between the groups. Adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality and graft failure in diabetics were 2.99 (95% CI 2.67-3.35; p < .01) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.92-1.05, p < .01), respectively. CONCLUSION: Diabetes mellitus in young adult kidney transplant recipients is associated with a nearly three-fold increase in mortality, reflecting a relatively vulnerable patient population. Identifying the underlying causes of poor outcomes in this population should be a priority for future study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Progress in pediatric transplantation measured in the context of waitlist and posttransplant survival is well documented but falls short of providing a complete perspective for children and their families. An intent-to-treat analysis, in which we measure survival from listing to death regardless of whether a transplant is received, provides a more comprehensive perspective through which progress can be examined. METHODS: Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze factors impacting intent-to-treat survival in 12 984 children listed for heart transplant, 17 519 children listed for liver transplant, and 16 699 children listed for kidney transplant. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess change in waitlist, posttransplant, and intent-to-treat survival. Wait times and transplant rates were compared by using χ2 tests. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat survival steadily improved from 1987 to 2017 in children listed for heart (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.97), liver (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97), and kidney (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99) transplant. Waitlist and posttransplant survival also improved steadily for all 3 organs. For heart transplant, the percentage of patients transplanted within 1 year significantly increased from 1987 to 2017 (60.8% vs 68.7%); however, no significant increase was observed in liver (68.9% vs 72.5%) or kidney (59.2% vs 62.7%) transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Intent-to-treat survival, which is more representative of the patient perspective than individual metrics alone, steadily improved for heart, liver, and kidney transplant over the study period. Further efforts to maximize the donor pool, improve posttransplant outcomes, and optimize patient care while on the waitlist may contribute to future progress.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess improvements in long-term survival of pediatric patients after liver transplantation by analyzing outcomes in transplant recipients who survived beyond 1 year after transplantation. There has been a marked increase in the 1-year survival of pediatric patients, from 78% in transplant recipients between 1987 and 1990 to 95% in transplant recipients between 2011 and 2017. The long-term outcomes have not seen a similar trend, creating a disparity that warrants analysis. METHODS: We analyzed 13 753 pediatric patients who survived for 1 year after receiving orthotopic liver transplantation between 1987 and 2017. The study period was divided into six eras. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method for time-to-event analysis, and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: There were no significant gains in long-term outcomes among 1-year survivors over the past three decades. Log-rank tests for equality of survivor functions between each era and 1987-1990 were not statistically significant. Cause of death analysis revealed that although infections caused 20.6% of deaths in patients transplanted between 1987 and 1990, this number dropped to 5.6% in those transplanted between 2011 and 2017 (p = .01). Malignancy caused 10.6% of deaths in 1987-1990 but caused 22.2% of the deaths in 2011-2017 (p = .04). CONCLUSION: Despite the gratifying gains in short-term survival of pediatric patients, 1-year survivors have no significant improvements in long-term survival after undergoing a liver transplantation. Long-term sequelae of immunosuppression, such as malignancy and infection, continue to be the most common causes of death. This study highlights the necessity for better long-term management of immunosuppression.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The disparity between the number of individuals on the wait list and available liver allografts creates the need for a system that maximizes donor liver utilization and predicts graft failure. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to determine the relationship between donor Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), liver discard, and graft failure. DESIGN: Through multivariate analysis from 53 966 deceased liver donors, we adjusted for donor clinical and demographic characteristics and compared donor GGT with allograft discard. We compared donor GGT ranges with graft failure and analyzed data from 47 269 liver recipients. RESULTS: After adjusting for other factors, donor GGT was significantly associated with liver discard, with GGT over 200 U/L being most significant (OR 2.74, CI 2.51-2.99). Donor GGT under 20 U/L was also found to be a protective factor for post-transplant graft failure (HR 0.91, CI 0.83 - 1.00). CONCLUSION: Going forward, GGT should be included among other characteristics associated with allograft discard considered during the procurement process.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Pediatric kidney transplant recipients generally have good outcomes post-transplantation. However, the younger age and longer life span after transplantation in the pediatric population make understanding the multifactorial nature of long-term graft survival critical. This investigation analyzes factors associated with 10-year survival to identify areas for improvement in patient care. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test and univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods were used to retrospectively analyze 7785 kidney transplant recipients under the age of 18 years from January 1, 1998, until March 9, 2008, using United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data. Our end-point was death-censored 10-year graft survival after excluding recipients whose grafts failed within one year of transplant. Recipients aged 5-18 years had lower 10-year graft survival, which worsened as age increased: 5-9 years (OR: 0.66; CI: 0.52-0.83), 10-14 years (OR: 0.43; CI: 0.33-0.55), and 15-18 years (OR: 0.34; CI: 0.26-0.44). Recipient African American ethnicity (OR: 0.67; CI: 0.58-0.78) and Hispanic donor ethnicity (OR: 0.82; CI: 0.72-0.94) had worse outcomes than other donor and recipient ethnicities, as did patients on dialysis at the time of transplant (OR: 0.82; CI: 0.73-0.91). Recipient private insurance status (OR: 1.35; CI: 1.22-1.50) was protective for 10-year graft survival. By establishing the role of age, race, and insurance status on long-term graft survival, we hope to guide clinicians in identifying patients at high risk for graft failure. This study highlights the need for increased allocation of resources and medical care to reduce the disparity in outcomes for certain patient populations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Successful liver transplantation is dependent on restoration of hepatic arterial (HA) flow. Although uncommon, some native recipient HAs are not suitable or inadequate for anastomosis, thereby necessitating extra-anatomic HA reconstruction. Splenic artery transposition (SAT) is 1 method of HA reconstruction, in which the recipient splenic artery is transposed to reestablish perfusion of the donor liver. Due to the rarity of the technique, literature describing outcomes is limited. In the current report, we describe 3 patients (2 adults, 1 pediatric) who underwent complex upper abdominal surgery before whole-organ deceased donor liver transplantation with SAT. METHODS: The demographic and patient care information was collected prospectively and subsequently reviewed retrospectively. Given the de-identified nature of the data included, this study was exempt from approval from an ethics board. RESULTS: Recipient splenic arteries were dissected from their origin at the celiac trunk, for approximately 3-5 cm to ensure a gentle anterior-cranial curve toward the right upper quadrant, allowing anastomosis to the donor celiac trunk in an end-to-end fashion. Postoperatively, all 3 patients had rapid normalization of liver function tests and brisk HA flow demonstrated by Doppler ultrasound. Longer-term follow-up, ranging from 1 to 3 years, reveals continued patency of the reconstructed HAs and liver function tests within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience points to SAT as a safe and effective technique for extra-anatomic HA reconstruction.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is an 18.9% discard rate among kidney allografts. Here, we aimed to determine predictors of kidney discard and construct an index to identify high-probability discard kidney allografts prior to procurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 102 246 potential kidney allograft donors from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database were used in this analysis. The cohort was randomized into 2 groups. The training set included 67% of the cohort and was used to derive a predictive index for discard that comprised 21 factors identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The validation set included 33% and was used to internally validate the kidney discard risk index. RESULTS: In 77.3% of donors, at least 1 kidney was used for transplant, whereas in 22.7% of donors, both kidneys were discarded. The kidney discard risk index was highly predictive of discard with a C statistic of 0.89 (0.88-0.89). The bottom 10th percentile had a discard rate of 0.73%, whereas the top 10th percentile had a discard rate of 83.65%. The 3 most predictive factors for discard were age, creatinine level, and hepatitis C antibody status. CONCLUSIONS: We identified 21 factors predictive of discard prior to donor procurement and used these to develop a kidney discard risk index with a C statistic of 0.89.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Of the 600 pediatric candidates added to the liver waiting list annually, 100 will remain waiting while over 100 liver allografts are discarded, often for subjective reasons. METHODS: We created a risk index to predict discard to better optimize donor supply. We used the UNOS database to retrospectively analyze 17 367 deceased donors (≤18 years old) through univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Deceased donor clinical characteristics and laboratory values were independent variables with discard being the dependent variable in the analysis. Significant univariate factors (P-value < .05) comprised the multivariate analysis. Significant variables from the multivariate analysis were incorporated into the pDSRI, producing a risk score for discard. RESULTS: From 17 potential factors, 11 were identified as significant predictors (P < .05) of pediatric liver allograft discard. The most significant risk factors were as follows: DCD; total bilirubin >10 mg/dL, and alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥500 IU/L. The pDSRI has a C-statistic of 0.846 for the training set and 0.840 for the validation set. CONCLUSION: The pDSRI uses 11 significant risk factors, including elevated liver function tests, donor demographics, and donor risk/type to accurately predict risk of pediatric liver allograft discard and serve as a tool that may maximize donor yield.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The clinical course of COVID-19 in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients remains ambiguous. Though preliminary experiences with adult transplant recipients have been published, literature centered on the pediatric population is limited. We herein report a multi-center, multi-organ cohort analysis of COVID-19-positive transplant recipients ≤ 18 years at time of transplant. Data were collected via institutions' respective electronic medical record systems. Local review boards approved this cross-institutional study. Among 5 transplant centers, 26 patients (62% male) were reviewed with a median age of 8 years. Six were heart recipients, 8 kidney, 10 liver, and 2 lung. Presenting symptoms included cough (n = 12 (46%)), fever (n = 9 (35%)), dry/sore throat (n = 3 (12%)), rhinorrhea (n = 3 (12%)), anosmia (n = 2 (8%)), chest pain (n = 2 (8%)), diarrhea (n = 2 (8%)), dyspnea (n = 1 (4%)), and headache (n = 1 (4%)). Six patients (23%) were asymptomatic. No patient required supplemental oxygen, intubation, or ECMO. Eight patients (31%) were hospitalized at time of diagnosis, 3 of whom were already admitted for unrelated problems. Post-transplant immunosuppression was reduced for only 2 patients (8%). All symptomatic patients recovered within 7 days. Our multi-institutional experience suggests the prognoses of pediatric transplant recipients infected with COVID-19 may mirror those of immunocompetent children, with infrequent hospitalization and minimal treatment, if any, required.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We describe the successful pediatric liver transplant for unresectable hepatoblastoma in a 4-year-old male with COVID-19 prior to transplant. The first negative NP swab was documented 1 month after initial diagnosis, when SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were also detected. The patient was actively listed for liver transplant after completing four blocks of a SIOPEL-4 based regimen due to his PRETEXT IV disease which remained unresectable. Following three additional negative NP swabs and resolution of symptoms for 4 weeks, he underwent a whole-organ pediatric liver transplant. COVID-19 positivity determined via NP swab SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR (Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay). IgG and IgM total SARS- CoV-2 antibodies detected by Ortho Clinical Diagnostics VITROS® Immunodiagnostics Products Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Test. Patient received standard prednisone and tacrolimus-based immunosuppression without induction therapy following transplant. Post-transplant course was remarkable for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with discharge home on post-transplant day #11. Surveillance tests have remained negative with persistent SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies at 6 weeks after transplant. We describe one of the earliest, if not the first case of liver transplant following recent recovery from COVID-19 in a pediatric patient with a lethal malignant liver tumor. A better understanding of how to balance the risk profile of transplant in the setting of COVID-19 with disease progression if transplant is not performed is needed. We followed existing ASTS guidelines to document clearance of the viral infection and resolution of symptoms before transplant. This case highlights that pediatric liver transplantation can be safely performed upon clearance of COVID-19.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Investigating outcomes after marginal allograft transplant is essential in determining appropriate and more aggressive use of these allografts. OBJECTIVE: To determine the time trends in the outcomes of marginal liver allografts as defined by 6 different sets of criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort, multicenter study, 75 050 patients who received a liver transplant between March 1, 2002, and September 30, 2016, were retrospectively analyzed to last known follow-up (n = 55 395) or death (n = 19 655) using the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. The study period was divided into three 5-year eras: 2002-2006, 2007-2011, and 2012-2016. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to examine the allograft after transplant with marginal allografts, which were defined as 90th percentile Donor Risk Index allografts (calculated over the entire study period), donor after circulatory death allografts, national share allografts, old age (donors >70 years) allografts, fatty liver allografts, and 90th percentile Discard Risk Index allografts. Statistical analysis was performed from August to December 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Allograft failure after transplant as defined by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. RESULTS: Among the 75 050 patients (44 394 men; mean [SD] age, 54.3 [9.9] years) in the study, Donor Risk Index, patient Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, and balance of risk scores significantly increased over time. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that 90th percentile Donor Risk Index allograft survival increased across the study period (2002-2006: hazard ratio, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.34-1.49]; 2007-2011: hazard ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.17-1.34]; 2012-2016: hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.98-1.24]). Secondary definitions of marginal allografts (donor after circulatory death, national share, old age donors, fatty liver, and 90th percentile Discard Risk Index) showed similar improvements in allograft survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The study's findings encourage the aggressive use of liver allografts and may indicate a need for a redefinition of allograft marginality in liver transplantation.

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Investigating outcomes after marginal allograft transplant is essential in determining appropriate and more aggressive use of these allografts. OBJECTIVE: To determine the time trends in the outcomes of marginal liver allografts as defined by 6 different sets of criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this case-control, multicenter study, 75 050 patients who received a liver transplant between March 1, 2002, and September 30, 2016, were retrospectively analyzed to last known follow-up (n = 55 395) or death (n = 19 655) using the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. The study period was divided into three 5-year eras: 2002-2006, 2007-2011, and 2012-2016. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to examine the allograft after transplant with marginal allografts, which were defined as 90th percentile Donor Risk Index allografts (calculated over the entire study period), donor after circulatory death allografts, national share allografts, old age (donors >70 years) allografts, fatty liver allografts, and 90th percentile Discard Risk Index allografts. Statistical analysis was performed from August to December 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Allograft failure after transplant as defined by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. RESULTS: Among the 75 050 patients (44 394 men; mean [SD] age, 54.3 [9.9] years) in the study, Donor Risk Index, patient Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, and balance of risk scores significantly increased over time. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that 90th percentile Donor Risk Index allograft survival increased across the study period (2002-2006: hazard ratio, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.34-1.49]; 2007-2011: hazard ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.17-1.34]; 2012-2016: hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.98-1.24]). Secondary definitions of marginal allografts (donor after circulatory death, national share, old age donors, fatty liver, and 90th percentile Discard Risk Index) showed similar improvements in allograft survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The study's findings encourage the aggressive use of liver allografts and may indicate a need for a redefinition of allograft marginality in liver transplantation.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: PELD scores are used to reduce waitlist mortality, but they do not accurately predict likelihood of prolonged length-of-stay or higher costs associated with it. This study aims to create a pediatric length-of-stay (LOS) index to predict increased risk of prolonged stay following liver transplantation. METHODS: The scoring system generated predicts length-of-stay following pediatric liver transplantation. With univariate and multivariate analyses on data from 5669 pediatric liver transplant recipients, independent recipient/donor risk factors for prolonged stay (>30 days) were identified. Multiple imputations accounted for missing variables. RESULTS: The most significant factors were ICU admission (OR 2.92, CI 2.27-3.75), recipient bilirubin >32 (OR 2.35, CI 1.70-3.25), and hemodialysis 1 week before transplantation (OR 2.27, CI 1.57-3.27). The LOS index assigns weighted scoring points to factors to predict prolonged stay (C-statistic of .72). The index demonstrated discrimination across the population after dividing it into quartiles for prolonged stay. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric LOS index, utilizing 13 donor/recipient factors, can assess the risk for pediatric liver transplantation prolonged stay. Important predictive factors are hemodialysis, ICU admission, recipient weight and bilirubin, and recipient life support status.

Asunto(s)