Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 69(6): 1106-10, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19249035

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic-cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and molecular analysis are useful diagnostic tests in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous cysts. OBJECTIVE: To assess agreement between CEA and molecular analysis for differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous cysts. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS-guided FNA for evaluation of pancreatic cysts were identified. The following information was used to designate a cyst mucinous: the CEA criterion was CEA level >or=192 ng/mL and the molecular analysis criteria were DNA quantity >or=40 ng/microL and/or k-ras 2-point mutation and/or >or=2 allelic imbalance mutations. Pathologic analysis of cysts served as the criterion standard. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2007, 100 patients met the study criteria. The average age of the patients was 63 years, 65% were women, and 30% were symptomatic. The mean diameter of pancreatic cysts was 2.5 cm. The median CEA value was 83 ng/mL (range 1-50,000 ng/mL), the mean DNA content was 16 ng/microL (range 1-212 ng/microL), 11% had K-ras mutations, and 43% had >or=2 allelic imbalance mutations. When using prespecified criteria, there was poor agreement between CEA and molecular analysis for the classification of mucinous cysts (kappa = 0.2). Poor agreement existed between CEA and DNA quantity (Spearman correlation = 0.2; P = .1), K-ras mutation (kappa = 0.3), and >or=2 allelic imbalance mutations (kappa = 0.1). Of the 19 patients for whom a final pathologic diagnosis was available, CEA had a sensitivity of 82% compared with 77% for molecular analysis. When CEA and molecular analysis were combined, 100% sensitivity was achieved. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis and small sample size. CONCLUSION: There was poor agreement between CEA levels and molecular analysis for diagnosis of mucinous cysts. Diagnostic sensitivity was improved when results of CEA levels and molecular analysis were combined.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/metabolismo , ADN de Neoplasias/genética , Quiste Pancreático/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/genética , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Anciano , Desequilibrio Alélico , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Transformación Celular Neoplásica/genética , Transformación Celular Neoplásica/patología , Líquido Quístico/metabolismo , Cistadenocarcinoma Mucinoso/genética , Cistadenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Cistoadenoma Mucinoso/genética , Cistoadenoma Mucinoso/patología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endosonografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Páncreas/patología , Quiste Pancreático/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Mutación Puntual/genética , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras) , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Proteínas ras
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA