RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine effects of fecal sample storage and delayed secondary enrichment (DSE) on detection of Salmonella spp in swine feces. Sample Population-Fecal samples obtained from 84 pigs in a commercial herd. PROCEDURE: Each fecal sample underwent 3 storage treatments: no storage (ie, processed on the day of collection), storage at 4 C for 6 days, and storage at -15 C for 14 days. After assigned storage treatments, all samples were enriched in Rappaport-Vassiladias (RV) broth (single enrichment) and plated on XLT4 agar. Delayed secondary enrichment was performed, using single enrichment broths that were stored for 4 days at room temperature. RESULTS: Of 504 cultures, 186 (36.9%) were Salmonella positive. A difference in proportions of samples with positive results was not found between same-day processing and storage at 4 C for 6 days. Compared with use of single enrichment for 24 hours (34% positive), use of DSE resulted in a greater proportion (40%; P < 0.001) of samples with positive results. Estimated relative sensitivities for the storage methods were 0.90, 0.85, and 0.71 for same-day processing, storage at 4 C for 6 days, and storage at -15 C for 14 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Where practical, processing of fecal samples on the day of collection is recommended, although storage at 4 C for several days does not result in marked loss of sensitivity. Improved detection associated with DSE warrants further investigation and optimization.
Asunto(s)
Heces/microbiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Manejo de Especímenes/veterinaria , Porcinos/microbiología , Animales , Femenino , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare results of 6 commercially available milk antimicrobial screening tests with results of liquid chromatography (LC) when testing milk samples from individual cows treated for mild clinical mastitis by intramammary (IMM) infusion with amoxicillin or penicillin G. ANIMALS: 6 cows with noninduced clinical mastitis: 3 treated by IMM infusion with amoxicillin and 3 treated by IMM infusion with penicillin G. PROCEDURE: Composite milk samples were collected before, during, and after treatment. Samples were assayed by use of the screening tests and their results and those of LC were compared. The LC results were assumed to represent the true result. RESULTS: Results of screening tests compared well with results of LC, with agreement of 94%. Positive screening test results for samples containing drug values below the established tolerance or safe level, as evaluated by LC, were obtained from 2 cows in which abnormal milk, as well as marked increases in composite milk somatic cell count, were observed. With the exception of 1 test in 1 cow, all screening tests had negative results at the end of the labeled milk-withholding time. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: On the basis of results of the limited sample reported, the screening tests appeared to provide good agreement overall, compared with LC results, when testing milk of individual cows treated by IMM infusion with amoxicillin or penicillin G. Positive screening test results for milk samples containing amoxicillin or penicillin G at values below the established tolerance or safe level, as evaluated by LC, may occasionally be obtained.