RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) indications are limited to gastrointestinal disorders and ulcer prophylaxis. However, PPIs are among the most frequently prescribed drugs. AIM: To evaluate the appropriateness of PPI prescriptions and identify predictive factors for inappropriate PPI use. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational study using a Dutch primary care database with all new PPI prescriptions between 2016 and 2018. METHOD: Individual patient data and details on PPI use were collected. The appropriateness of initiation and continuation of PPI prescriptions was evaluated using the applicable guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 148 926 patients (aged ≥18 years) from 27 general practices were evaluated. A total of 23 601 (16%) patients started PPI therapy (mean age 57 [SD 17] years, 59% female). Valid PPI indications at initiation were seen in 10 466 PPI users (44%). Predictors for inappropriately initiated PPI use were older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03 to 1.03), and use of non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR 5.15, 95% CI = 4.70 to 5.65), adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors (OR 5.07, 95% CI = 3.46 to 7.41), COX-2 inhibitors (also known as coxibs) (OR 3.93, 95% CI = 2.92 to 5.28), and low-dose aspirin (OR 3.83, 95% CI = 3.07 to 4.77). Despite an initial valid indication, PPI use was inaccurately continued in 32% of patients on short-course therapy for dyspepsia and in 11% of patients on ulcer prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: More than half of PPI users in primary care were found to have an inappropriate indication, with unnecessary ulcer prophylaxis related to drug use being one of the leading causes. Future initiatives to reduce PPI use for unnecessary ulcer prophylaxis and timely deprescription if PPI is no longer indicated, are needed.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Úlcera , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Úlcera/inducido químicamente , Úlcera/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aspirina , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
Aspirin is traditionally taken once daily in the morning and considered to be effective throughout the 24h interval. Cardiovascular events occur most frequently in the early morning, suggesting that these hours are critical in terms of adequate platelet inhibition. This study therefore assed platelet function in the early morning-8.00 AM-in healthy volunteers, during a once-daily (OD) 80 mg morning in comparison with an OD evening regimen and a twice-daily (BID) 40 mg regimen. It was an open-label randomized cross-over study, comprising 12 healthy subjects. Subjects were allocated to three sequential dosage regimens: 80 mg OD at 8.00 AM, 80mg OD at 8.00 PM, and 40 mg BID at 8.00 AM and PM. Platelet function 12 and 24 hours after aspirin intake was measured by means of serum thromboxane B2 (sTxB2) levels, the collagen/epinephrine closure time (Platelet Function Analyzer(PFA)-200®) and the Aspirin Reaction Units (ARU, VerifyNow®). The results demonstrated that early morning sTxB2 concentrations were 5843pg in the morning regimen, 2877pg in the evening OD regimen, and 3343pg in the BID regimen (morning- vs evening regimen p = < 0.01; morning- vs BID regimen p = < 0.01). Early morning PFA-closure time (p = 0.12)) as well as VerifyNow ARU (p = 0.17) mean values were similar for all three regimens. In conclusion, the OD-morning regimen seems to acquire the lowest level of platelet inhibition during the critical early morning window. Switching to an OD-evening or BID intake seems prudent, although further research on clinical cardiovascular outcome in patients with stable cardiovascular disease is needed.