RESUMEN
SUMMARY: Topical treatments in ophthalmologic therapy are significant for the development of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in the periorbital region. Preservatives, antibiotics, glucocorticoids, and beta-blocker eye drops are defined as drugs with the highest sensitizing potential. The unavailability of patch test batteries containing substances of ophthalmological use makes it difficult for this diagnosis. In the present report, we describe six patients who developed ACD induced by different agents presenting in eye drops, confirmed with the cutaneous patch tests. The ACD diagnosis due to ophthalmic medications can be challenging, since many different agents can cause it, and the sensitivity of these cutaneous tests is low. Thus, early diagnosis is essential to avoid the complications of ACD on the skin and ocular disorders related to chronic periorbital eczema.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatología , Brasil , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Humanos , Soluciones Oftálmicas/efectos adversos , Pruebas del ParcheRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) have distinct clinical manifestations, usually with more aggressive organ involvement and highermortality than limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSC). Hearing loss had not yet been evaluated in this subtype, so our aim was to assess the auditory system of dcSSc patients in a controlled study. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with dcSSc, according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, were evaluated. For each dcSSc patient included in the study, two healthy controls were matched for sex and age (± 2 years). All patients responded to a structured questionnaire regarding otological symptoms and risk factors with regard to hearing loss. A complete ear/nose/throat physical examination was performed followed by speech/pure tone audiometry and impedance measurements. RESULTS: The mean age of the dcSSc patients was 47.0 ± 11.9 years; the mean disease duration was 9.4 ± 9.1 years, and there was a clear female predominance (83%). The questionnaire revealed auditory complaints in 54% of the dcSSc patients (25% hearing loss, 21% aural fullness, 21% tinnitus, and 21% dizziness) and normal otoscopy. Nearly half (46%) of the dcSSc patients were diagnosed as having hearing loss on audiogram compared to only 19% in the control group (p = 0.01). All dcSSc with hearing loss had a sensorineural component, eight (73%) with excellent discrimination on the Percentage Index of Speech Recognition (PISR). Descending configuration and Metz recruitment were observed in 54% of these patients, suggesting cochlear involvement. CONCLUSION: Patients with dcSSc have a high prevalence of sensorineural audiometric hearing impairment and otological complaints, suggesting that the cochlea is an additional target organ in this disease.