RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyse nutritional risk, by age and sex, among primary and secondary education adolescents from Cantabria. METHODOLOGY: a cross-sectional study was carried out, analysing a sample of 1101 adolescents: 568 (51.6%) were men and 533 (48.4%) were women, aged 12 to 17, attending 16 different primary and secondary education centres in Cantabria, by means of a Krece Plus questionnaire. RESULTS: A high percentage of adolescents with a high nutritional risk (35%) can be observed. Men show a high nutritional risk slightly higher than women (37.8% male vs 32.1% female). Moreover, the high nutritional risk experiences a notable increase as young people get older. Significant statistical differences can be seen both in male and female groups, and as a global group. In all three cases, the nutritional risk distribution in the youngest group is very similar (35.2-35.8% in male, 27.9-29.7% in female, 31.7-32.7% in the global group); whereas in elder adolescents, those values are practically doubled (57.1% in male, 69.0% in female, y 62.2% in the global group). CONCLUSIONS: Results are alarming mainly given the high percentage of adolescents with a high nutritional risk. Men and older adolescents are the groups in which high nutritional risk is more evident.
Objetivo: Evaluar el riesgo nutricional, por edad y sexo, que presentan los adolescentes escolarizados en la Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria. Sujetos: Se realizó un estudio transversal, analizando una muestra de 1101 adolescentes, de los que 51,6% eran varones y 48,4% fueron mujeres de edades comprendidas entre los 10 y los 17 años, escolarizados en centros de enseñanza pública, mediante el cuestionario Krece Plus. Resultados: Se observa un elevado porcentaje de adolescentes que presentan un riesgo nutricional elevado (35%). Los varones presentan un riesgo nutricional alto en un porcentaje ligeramente superior a las mujeres (37,8 % vs 32,1%). Además, el riesgo nutricional alto sufre un notable incremento a medida que la edad de los jóvenes aumenta. Se aprecian diferencias estadísticamente significativas tanto en los grupos de edad de los varones (p = 0,024), de las mujeres (p < 0,001) como en el grupo global (p = 0,001). En los tres casos, la distribución del riego nutricional en los grupos de menor edad es muy similar (entre 35,2 y 35,8% en los h, entre 27,9 y 29,7% en las m, y entre 31,7 y 32,7% en el grupo total). Mientras que en el grupo de mayor edad estos valores prácticamente se duplican (57,1% en los h, 69,0% en las m, y 62,2 % en el grupo total). Conclusión: Los resultados obtenidos muestran una realidad preocupante debido, principalmente, al elevado porcentaje de adolescentes que presentan un riesgo nutricional elevado. Siendo los varones y los adolescentes de mayor edad los sectores en los que este riesgo nutricional elevado es superior.
Asunto(s)
Desnutrición/epidemiología , Estado Nutricional , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
We analysed the secular trends in health-related physical fitness in Spanish adolescents between 2001-2002 and 2006-2007. Two representative population studies were conducted 5 years apart in adolescents (12.5-17.5 years) from Zaragoza (Spain) that participated in the AVENA study in 2001-2002 and in the HELENA-CSS study in 2006-2007. Both studies used the same tests to assess physical fitness: the handgrip strength, bent arm hang, standing broad jump, 4×10m shuttle run and 20m shuttle run tests. Performance in 4×10m shuttle run and 20m shuttle run tests was higher in 2006-2007 (Cohen's d ranging from 0.2 to 0.4, p<0.05), whereas performance in handgrip strength and standing broad jump tests was lower in 2006-2007 (Cohen's d ranging from 0.3 to 1.1, p<0.001). Adjustment for age, pubertal status, fat mass, fat free mass and parental education did not alter the results. The odds ratio (OR) of meeting the FITNESSGRAM Standards for healthy cardiorespiratory fitness was higher in 2006-2007 in both boys (OR, 95% CI: 2.123, 1.157-3.908) and girls (OR, 95% CI: 2.420, 1.377-4.255). The results indicate that levels of both speed/agility and cardiorespiratory fitness were higher in 2006-2007 than in 2001-2002, whereas muscular strength components were lower in 2006-2007.