Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 139(2): 271-9, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15733988

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative impact of best and worst eye on vision-related quality of life in patients suffering from age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Quality of life and visual acuity data were collected at baseline during a randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Multicenter (11 centers), international study. PATIENTS: One hundred fourteen patients with a diagnosis of exudative AMD and primary or recurrent subfoveal neovascular membrane (greatest linear dimension of lesion < or =5400 microm; > or =50% of the total lesion was choroidal neovascularization (CNV); classic component of the total CNV > or = 1.0 mm(2)). All patients were over age 50 years, of any race, either sex. INTERVENTION OR OBSERVATION PROCEDURE: NEI-VFQ-39 questionnaire administered to patients at home by trained telephone interviewers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ETDRS visual acuity (VA) was measured in both eyes separately. Vision-related quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the NEI-VFQ-39. An analysis of variance was performed on the NEI-VFQ scores, including best eye VA (VA > 20/40 vs VA < or = 20/40), worst eye VA (VA > 20/200 vs VA < or = 20/200), and the interaction between the two as independent variables. RESULTS: Best eye VA was 0.34 on average, with VA > 20/40 in 43.0% of patients. Worst eye VA was 0.85 on average, with VA > 20/200 in 32.5% of patients. VA was not linked to general health and ocular pain scores. General Vision, Near Activities, Distance Vision, Driving, Mental Health, Role Difficulties, Dependency, Peripheral Vision, and the Global NEI-VFQ scores were affected by both best eye VA and worst eye VA. CONCLUSION: In the study sample, worst eye VA (< or =20/200) and best eye VA (< or =20/40) contributed independently to vision-related QoL. These results suggest that preserving a minimal visual acuity in the worst eye may contribute to vision-related quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Visión Ocular/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neovascularización Coroidal/etiología , Neovascularización Coroidal/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Agudeza Visual/fisiología
2.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 22(3): 197-206, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14871166

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Physicians need reliable, valid and sensitive questionnaires to assess QOL related to glaucoma or ocular hypertension. This article presents the psychometric properties of the French version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25). METHODS: A mail survey was sent to 20000 households. The survey identified 581 residents with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Of these a random sample (n = 204) took part in a telephone survey during which the NEI VFQ-25 was completed by eligible patients (those taking at least one topical treatment for glaucoma or ocular hypertension on the day of the interview). Multi-trait analysis was performed to assess the construct validity of the questionnaire. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and the average inter-item correlation. Known groups validity was assessed by comparing patients grouped by duration of glaucoma, adjusted for age and gender. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-three patients participated in the survey. Analysis of convergent validity showed that all of the items in each scale correlated above 0.40 with their own scale except for the 'driving' scale. The success rate of the discriminant validity ranged from 57.1% to 100% except for the 'driving' scale, which was 7.1%. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were all above 0.70 except the 'driving' score. Participants with glaucoma for less than 20 years consistently had better 'global', 'near vision', 'distant vision', 'driving', 'social function' and 'peripheral vision' scores than those with disease of 20+ years duration, indicating better QOL in patients with a shorter disease duration. CONCLUSION: The NEI VFQ-25 is a validated instrument to measure vision-targeted QOL in French populations with glaucoma.


Asunto(s)
Glaucoma/psicología , Hipertensión Ocular/psicología , Psicometría/instrumentación , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Glaucoma/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Hipertensión Ocular/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Estados Unidos , Trastornos de la Visión/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA