RESUMEN
Prothrombin (F2) 20210G>A [rs1799963 G>A] mutation is a genetic variant which predisposes to inherited thrombophilia. Highest prevalence of this rare mutation has been reported among Caucasian and Mediterranean populations with thrombophilic conditions compared to healthy controls. It is absent or occurs in a very low frequency in both thrombophilic patients and healthy controls of most South Asian populations. A previous study has demonstrated that the mutant allele is absent among Sri Lankan healthy controls. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of the F2 20210G>A mutation among Sri Lankan patients with thrombo-embolic disorders. F2 20210G>A mutation analysis was carried out on 825 patients. These included 374 with arterial thromboembolic disorders, 303 with venous thromboembolic disorders (VTE) and 148 with pregnancy related complications. Genotyping was done using polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism. The overall prevalence of the individuals detected with the mutation was 0.8 % (7/825) with a mutant allele frequency of 0.4 % (7/1,650), and all were heterozygotes. Further classification according to the types of thrombotic events showed a prevalence of 0.5 % (2/374), 1.3 % (4/303), and 0.7 % (1/148) respectively, in the three groups with arterial thrombosis, VTE and pregnancy complications. The respective mutant allele frequencies in the three different groups were 0.3 % (2/748), 0.7 % (4/606) and 0.3 % (1/296). Although these figures are lower than that of Caucasian and Mediterranean populations, they are relatively higher compared to other South Asian populations. Therefore, the F2 20210G>A mutant allele is not entirely absent among Sri Lankan patients with thrombo-embolic disorders.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Stored human samples and the establishment of biobanks are increasing in the world. Along with this there are the questions of ethics that arise such as the correct method of obtaining informed consent for research on stored samples and the policies involved in collaborative research using collected samples. This study is an attempt to evaluate the researchers, academics and policy makers' views on these ethical aspects. METHODS: This was an anonymised study involving a Sri Lankan population of researchers, ethics committee members, and policy makers. A self administered questionnaire was utilised as the study instrument. The questionnaire captured four major areas of interest: demographic characteristics of respondents, their attitudes on informed consent policy, their opinion on rights of collaborating researchers, their attitudes on dealing with international differences in regulatory frameworks. RESULTS: The study included 55 responders with 40/55 (73%) agreeing that donors should receive the option of giving informed consent for future research, with 31/55 (56%) considering multiple- type consent options most appropriate. Regarding the issue of shared samples in collaborative research majority agreed that source country ethics review committee approval was necessary 53/55 (96%). CONCLUSION: The study concludes that sample donors should be given the option of giving advance consent to unspecified future research provided that future research is approved by an ethics committee. In collaborative research, it is necessary to involve ethics committees from donor countries in the research approval process.